Anyone shocked by this: dm me to buy a bridge.
this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
387 points (98.5% liked)
World News
50620 readers
2364 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
- Blogsites are treated in the same manner as social media sites. Medium, Blogger, Substack, etc. are not valid news links regardless of who is posting them. Yes, legitimate news sites use Blogging platforms, they also use Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube and we don't allow those links either.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
People vote for a convicted rapist and then are surprised when their country gets fucked.
Honestly though, anyone surprised by this is a fucking idiot. This was in the plan that they wrote and made publicly available years ago. You are not allowed to be surprised by this.
This was in the plan
It's also generally where our government operates. Under Clinton we watched the social safety net get cut. Under Dubya it was cut further. When the poors tried to revolt Obama stood by and let the NYPD brutalize them and let the banks con and rob them. Biden and Trump I also got in on the fun of making life harder for the poors, by standing by and doing nothing as the cost of living has doubled and tripled while wages stayed stagnant. (And for added fun, Biden and Trump have done nothing while homelessness is increasingly criminalized.)
It's who we are at a cultural level. We ARE a cruel people.
They thought that he would only hurt the people that they don't like. They have a hardon for cruelty. That is the defining characteristic of MAGA.
We're not dumbfounded by this.
Over the last 40 years our Federal Government has always been very intentionally and deliberately cruel to the poor. Democrats have done it. Republicans have done it. In our culture poverty is viewed as a personal moral failing, so it's a-okay if you're thrust out into the street to starve.
(Not saying I agree with it. It's just silly to pretend that Americans really give a shit about poverty.)
It's easy to forget that Trump won the popular vote, and that this is his second term.
America has a cruel president because Americans are cruel. That's what they want.
He didn't win the popular vote the first time. He lost by 3 million votes, but a Democrat has to win by a lot more than that because of the handicap set up by Republicans to favour Republicans. He lost by 8 million to Biden and that was enough for a Democrat to be appointed by the "Electoral College".
George W. Bush also lost the popular vote in 2000, but was appointed.
I don't know if Trump actually won the popular vote in 2024. At this point it doesn't really matter. The rich and powerful are just going to appoint who they want, they don't give a fuck what the people vote for. The popular vote is an opinion at best, and it's not considered. Americans don't elect presidents, the ruling elite does.
I heard a take today that it's a purposeful provocation, in an attempt to elicit the ability to use martial law, I assume to keep himself in power. He needs the people to revolt, with violence. I dunno what I think about it.
I think escalation and violence from one side or another is happening regardless.
On one hand, if this is the game he will play he can make things worse and worse and just say "but if you react, I get what I want". Then he ruins programs and gets what he wants. On the other hand he has made things worse and more violent by lying and claiming that there is already a violent response... and he gets what he wants.
Win win for fascism either way.
They've been poking the bear for a while now and the bear continues to sleep. It's either because a good chunk of Americans are wise to their scheme OR a good chunk of Americans are too lazy or afraid to do anything about it. ICE, deploying the National Guard to various places, political assassinations and attempts, potential hunger riots, etc, etc, etc and non of it has worked.
It'll be interesting to see exactly WHAT results in Americans saying "enough is enough" but at this point...I don't think there's anything that will do that.
The cruelty is not a bug, its a feature.
Like all the money saved by hiring vibe coders cause they're cheaper! The bugs are the point!!!
It's not really like that at all.
They’re just surprised that the hatred they voted for is affecting them too
These respondents were self-selected Guardian readers. Doubt many voted for Trump.
Yeah that's what kept coming to mind: All these people are The Guardian readers so they probably already dislike Trump and likely blame him for this loss of benefits.
I would have liked to see The Guardian interview actual Trump voters to see what they feel about things.
There does seem to be a sentiment of wanting food stamps gone, because that's a program abused by non whites and immigrants, but SNAP must remain because they depend on it. Then being shocked it's the same thing and it's all gone now. Same with Obamacare and ACA.
My ex-wife turned our baby sitter onto the ACA and she was ecstatic! "At least it isn't that damned Obamacare!" Wife: "It's the same thing." Wish I had been there to see her face.
Lickspittles
People that are dumbfounded just haven’t been paying attention.
it's so incredibly frustrating reading americans thoughts on this stuff. like you just stroll over to virtually any reddit thread regarding anything the administration is doing and it's always "this must be illegal" or "it's happening" and what have you. Like they still don't get it. "I can't believe they're doing what they said they were going to do, I hope someone stops them" - proceeds to keep doom scrolling.
And then you have the democrats that insist the system isn't broken, insist that if they continue to play by the rules than the other side will also eventually decide that the rules should be followed...no, that's not how this work. A cheater doesn't suddenly have a come to jesus moment and thinks "you know...I really shouldn't cheat anymore."
Completely agree. I am in America, and it is incredibly frustrating. People, I think, are just kinda milling about until we hit an extremely obvious tipping point. There’s been far too many “lines in the sand” that we’ve left far behind us. Couple that with the average person who either has been conditioned to not want to think about politics or is “too burned out to care” (so frustrating), we end up where we are.
It’s certainly by design that republicans are constantly pushing villainizing critical thinking and institutions which teach it, even though they themselves all have degrees.
It doesn’t help that the vast majority of us are locked to our jobs for healthcare, and well over half the county lives paycheck to paycheck now and that’s only getting worse with inflation and wealth concentration at the top.
Losing SNAP benefits could be a tipping point. Once those millions of people run out of food (the largest group of recipients are, guess what, idiot trump supporters in red states), we might see some change. But not before (even more) people start to die, unfortunately.
And were privileged enough to only pay attention now
This is actually a huge part of the issue. While the move hurts white participants as well, proportionally it's much lower.
White people will largely shut up if they witness violence because they do not want to alter their racial privileges (and in doing so they avoid class solidarity).
Yes, and we will be dumbfounded how quickly they forget.
Hard to forget when you can’t eat.
They’ll forget who was at fault and blame the dems while giving the fascists a free pass.
Bingo.
On the way up to the next election (ha, if that ever happens) the Nazis will twist it that it all happened due to the shutdown, which was definitely not their fault. The others were the ones who wouldn't agree to things.
Whilst the dumb-ocrats will just blissfully bumble along not defending themselves, and then wonder why they have lost to the Nazis once again.
Gotta kill’em all.
As is tradition.
Imagine, army troops guarding grocery store exits.
It wasn't long ago that they were protecting cars.
Imagine being those fascist simps with all those guns and you’re like “yes, preventing the wrong people from getting food is my purpose”
"Dumbfounded by the cruelty" the cruelty is the point. It is infuriating to watch these people run over their own toes over and over, then ask without any sense of curiosity or desire to understand "why can't I walk anymore?" I don't think they want to know. I think it's easier to pretend that this is all too difficult and complex for them to understand than it is to come to grips with the reality that, to borrow industry lingo, "shit's fucked".
If they're truly dumbfounded by all this, then they're so braindead that they very likely voted for it. No sympathy at all.
No sympathy at all.
And the oroboros of American politics continues it's spiral.
It's too easy to blame those who voted for Trump. Instead blame the millions who didn't vote against him. Those who sat by and did nothing hoping the collective good would win. And then when it didn't, they wash their hands and say "you can't blame me, I didn't vote for that monster." Thing is, they were hedging their bet. They didn't care who won. They figured, no matter who won, any time anything bad happened, they could say "well I didn't vote for the president, don't blame me."
Blame those who didn't vote. Blame those who were fooled into voting for a third party, dividing the progressive and human rights voters. There are two kinds of people: those who voted against Trump (cast a vote for Harris) and those who voted for Trump (everyone else). They all own an equal share of the blame. And if their benefits are cut, or those of people they care about, I can't muster a lick of sympathy for them. This is what they voted for.
And sure, the president isn't voted by the people but rather appointed by the powerful, but I'm pretty sure if the people voted 2:1 or some other overwhelming amount, they would have appointed the winner of that vote. Only when it's close do they pick the one they actually want, even if he loses the popular vote (George W. Bush, Trump the first time).
Isn't a vote for Trump still worse effect-wise than a third-party vote or not voting?
Yes, although they are still both to blame.
"Americans can't see nose in front of own faces"
It's weird they keep generalizing... 63 percent of Americans right now disapprove of Trump.
Tell it like it is: Conservative idiots are dumb and can't understand whats going on.
It's not weird at all.
The vast majority of traditional media is not free. They know exactly what they are doing, and what messaging they are sending.
And the rest of the country just bends over.