this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
116 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

4363 readers
302 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

Yes, I'm sure every one is glad their tax money is being spent on drafts and debates on laws like this. Great job...

I don't like where the world is headed with these new laws.

If you regulate or ban this type of stuff I think you just end up with sexually frustrated people who instead of watching their porn (which has become outlawed), now go find someone to enact their will on forcefully.

That's just a theory of mine based on zero facts, but just what my brain has powerfully concocted.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Shall I take this as them being fans of the popular 2 girls 1 cup?

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 1 points 44 minutes ago

Under new uk law you'll be mandated to watch at least 2 hours of scat porn per day. All other forms of pornography will be illegal.

As most of what British people eat barely classifies as food, they'll begin slowly replacing food with actual human feces, thus saving large amounts of money on food expenditures.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago

Trying to regulate people's kinks is probably not going to stop the kinks from being kinks.

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 19 points 11 hours ago

Ah sorry government - you guys rejected the option to regulate porn. Nowadays nobody watches porn in the UK, people watch it "from Switzerland" instead. Go ask them to regulate.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 29 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I understand why they want to, but professionals give and have, consent. This is just kink shaming, honestly.

There's already done fairly aggressive agree verification laws there that were recently enacted, if memory serves me correctly, so now you're telling agree verified adults what they can, or cannot, watch.

I have zero doubt that the actors in the adult films depicting these kinds of scenarios are consenting adults. And while it may not be everyone's kink, it is some people's. If you don't like it, don't watch it. You're an adult. Deal with it.

Making laws so that everyone needs to abide by what you think is acceptable in terms of sexually explicit material, is ridiculous, with the only caveat being that all people involved must be consenting adults (depictions of non-adults is another legal matter entirely, and should continue to not be permitted - this is one of the few exceptions to the rule).

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 43 minutes ago* (last edited 41 minutes ago)

And animals.

That's wrong too.

Because they can't consent. It's also fucking gross but that's secondary.

Excepting dolphins I guess. They're highly intelligent and all kinds of horny so morally it's probably okay to fuck a dolphin though it's very very fucked up.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I think the main thing was that kids are going to watch it, and getting some very odd ideas about what normal boring vanilla shagging looks like... Also, it's mostly men choking women.

Although since it's now physically impossible for children to watch porn, maybe we don't need this any more?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Listen there are no people on this Earth less qualified to tell us what normal sex is like than the people who brought us the Victorian age.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago

Then, the solution would be to properly educate children about sex and consent.

Which right wingers also don't want to happen...

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 16 hours ago

I mean, we all use VPNs to wank now anyway, so why not?

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Burn JK Rowling alive

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 22 hours ago

Like how they outlawed any bdsm porn for a few years. People are just going to use VPNs. What a waste of time and money. The planet is burning, billionaires are killing and the government is banning kinky porn

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

But they'll have to learn to do it right on their own because virtually all the porn is gone due to containing it. Since some newbies will inevitably accidentally go too far with it, suddenly manslaughter (if that's what it's called in the UK) cases soar as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flickerby@lemmy.zip 8 points 20 hours ago

Lotta goth girls about to be out of a job

load more comments
view more: next ›