this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
596 points (99.5% liked)

People Twitter

8463 readers
2291 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

surprised they didn't still get a DUI for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated

y'know, what with cops giving them out to people sleeping it off in the back of their car and whatnot. somebody had to get in the car to put it in neutral

Cops don't catch most people.

[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry who can translate this to a European?

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 43 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The woman's car wouldn't start because of an installed device that makes her pass a breathalyzer (something courts can mandate). Midwestern people are stereotypically very helpful, but the ones from Wisconsin drink a lot, so nobody present could pass the breathalyzer either. The solution was for all the drunk strangers to physically push her car to where it needed to be.

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 27 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

that's why you have sober balloons in the trunk

[–] MycelialMass@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Holy crap lol i hope people dont do that

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

They're joking. Interkocks are more sophisticated than that. You're not going to fool one with a balloon. You have to inhale before exhaling, and a camera records a video of you blowing to make sure there's no funny business.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I had a friend in high school who's father was an alcoholic attorney, and he'd have his kids pass the breathalyzer for him every morning.

I actually bought a user 2001 S10 off them in 2004 with like 25k miles on it for only 3 grand because he'd keep rubbing along the side of in the driveway pulling in and out drunk, so it had a bunch of cosmetic damage that I didn't care about at all.

I drove that truck for 11 years.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That’s the best kind of S-10

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

It was so scraped up people probably assumed it was a Dakota.

[–] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Not anymore. You just have to breathe a certain way that can't be faked by a non-human.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 67 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

A car does not randomly have a DUI device...

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 52 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Especially in Wisconsin. Our drunk driving laws are some of the most lax in the nation. There's a saying that the first DUI is free, and it's only kinda a joke.

[–] YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Pop over to Michigan and they permanently revoke your license for a second DUI.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 21 points 16 hours ago

can't have shit in detroit

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago

When you look at consumption rates it makes sense. Wisconsin is a powerhouse of drinking.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Takes a whole lot of DUIs in Wisconsin. Probably years and years of consistently driving home drunk

Driving drunk is just an expected part of American life in most of the country. If it weren't, we'd have ways to get around other than by car

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Or maybe she's one of those dimwits who likes to annoy judges by asking them if they are following maritime or common law, and assert that the court doesn't have jurisdiction over them, and that they're not travelling, and that nobody was personally harmed...

It's impressive just how careful judges tend to be with these nutcases, which I suppose is because it's so far outside the rules of court, that they tend to play too safe and end up vindicating the whole clown show...

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 16 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Seriously, this isn't that sweet of a scene

[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 18 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Why not? Not a single person drove drunk that day

[–] Laser@feddit.org 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

At least not the car that has a DUI device installed. But considering the car is the primary method to get around in the States, some of the people in that story probably drove a car before and after

[–] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Is "waiting a few hours until you're better" not a thing in the US?

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It seems to me that there's some weird propaganda going on in this thread. I've only ever known one person who has driven while drunk and the only reason I know that is that he confessed it out of deep shame.

I guess it's possible that everyone I know is out joyriding every time they drink and just not telling me, but assuming that's not true, I - being from and in the US - never really experienced a culture remotely supportive of drunk driving.

[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

Not really. You can get a DUI for sleeping in the backseat of a car and you can get charged with vagrancy or public intox for sleeping it off in public. You have to go home (or to someone else's home), and the car is probably the only way to get there.

That's why designated drivers and taxis/ubers are so important. The only alternatives are dangerous or illegal unless you can find and afford a spontaneous hotel or you live in a big enough city to have useful public transit.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

"You don't have to go home but you can't stay here!"

Sitting in a car while drunk is a DUI in many if not most states.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 30 points 18 hours ago

It never pretended to be a sweet scene. It's basically just saying that wisconsinites are alcoholics.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 17 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

That's because they didn't include the part where she lands flat on her ass laughing when she realizes "this isn't even MY CAR you guys!"

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Some friends and I (though sober) once did this to a friend's car so that they would be confused when their shift ended.

I'm pretty sure they didn't even notice.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 27 points 19 hours ago

It would have been fine. The tow truck also has a DUI lockout.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 31 points 19 hours ago

Communities are stronger when they come together. Truly a inspiration to us all.

[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 11 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

The DUI device will let you shift into neutral? I thought usually you had to turn the key to get it into neutral.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 21 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It would be a safety hazard if it prevented you from shifting into neutral, for situations like this. Tow truck would have needed to put it in neutral as well

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Tow trucks dont have to. If they cant tow it on a free axle, they'll just use dollys.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Sometimes but many cars also have a shift lock override that allows you to drop it in neutral, usually a small slot near the shifter knob the key will fit into. Dollys are only good for short distance and sometimes you need to get it on a bed.

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Don't most cars also have the little hidden keyhole next to the shifter, specifically for this purpose?

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 17 points 18 hours ago

Depends on the car and device, but I think they usually disable the ignition, not the key turning.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 1 points 16 hours ago

I mean it is pretty damn unlikely these days but it could be a stick

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

That's the Midwest I miss

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Big 'ope energy.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The responsible thing to do would have been to make sure her car got towed.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

why?

it was parked in the wrong spot and they corrected the situation