this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
143 points (91.3% liked)

Reaction Memes

1034 readers
179 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Unlearned9545@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I prefer terms like queer or SAGA, but as a privileged white guy who is mostly straight and mostly cis I listen to the community on what they want to be called and call them that.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, the non-shitlibs tend to prefer 'queer'.

[–] Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You'd get your head kicked in round my neck for saying queer. YMMV.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

'I'm queer'?

I have been known to use the f slur for myself, so I figure i shouldn't worry about that.

[–] Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Sorry I mean, if you refer to yourself as queer then obviously not an issue at all, but I'm saying if you call other people queer, depending on where you are (specifically non USA), people will very possibly take that as derogatory. The word hasn't been fully recovered yet imo.

[–] swagmoney@lemmy.ca 16 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

my uncle's met at a university student 'lgb' club. yeah the acronym has changed to better represent trans people and that's great! but back in the day that's what it was called in my area. methinks if you hear someone call it by the outdated acronym they're probably not trying to be trans exclusive? that's just my read on it

[–] Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Oh absolutely. I generally ask a follow up or something questioning why there's no T. If they start whining? Honk honk

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It was GLS way back when.

It was GLASS in college.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 18 minutes ago

What did it stand for?

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I leave the + (and sometimes the Q) out because the initialism is already such a mouthful, but that doesn't mean that people who don't quite identify as one of the letters aren't included. It just means that maybe at some point we need a better term for gender-non-conforming people as a group.

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 hours ago

Maybe sexual and gender minorities (SGM)? I think I've seen that one in academic papers.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

maybe at some point we need a better term for gender-non-conforming people as a group.

By then we will discover that EVERYONE is in a group somewhere and we'll have used the entire alphabet but everyone will be a member.

Thats why 'queer' gets it. Doesn't force people into categories doesnt use the inherent hierarchy of linearity doesn't exclude by silence AND it makes clear the sociopolitical reason why these groups cluster.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 hours ago

I like the push for blanket "queer" to replace the initialism entirely. I also think the original rainbow flag was perfect and every addition muddles the poignant symbolism of it. It's all a spectrum, it's that easy. Granular inclusion is a slippery slope to internalized segregation.

[–] waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only valid LGB is trains: