Newsome: Protect kids!
Trans kids exist.
Newsome: Except them. Fuck them.
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Newsome: Protect kids!
Trans kids exist.
Newsome: Except them. Fuck them.
Yeah, lets complicate and screw everything up to solve a nonexistent problem so some politicians can feel righteous. Cause there's nothing important for legislatures to address.
Required age verifications
bruh
by operating system and app store providers
BRUH
🤦♂️
The way he mocked Trump made me think he was one of the smart ones. But he just made clear he isn't.
To be fair, being able to mock Trump is not a high bar
Newsom thinking of the children:

Or you know, the parents could do their job of raising their kids, not giving them an iPad at the age of five, and leaving them to fend for themselves on the Internet. No, let’s have the government fix this problem for us by spying on everybody. That will fix everything. /s
Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives
Newsom is a fucking billionaire puppet
The useful idiots are already gearing up to run him in 2028.
We're fucked.
Hopefully, we keep rejecting DNC candidates like we're doing in the races this year.
Using a nonexistent problem to strengthen spying on citizens. Well done.
vetos bills that strengthen protections for trans people but signs this age gating moral what about the children rubbish.
But did you hear? The media dickheads want us all to vote for him because he's... totally not just another useless establishment Dem.
Yet more Moral Panic -.-
Why do people keep sharing this as if it's an achievement?
Newsom and his tech donors can go get fucked.
Required age verification by operating system and app store providers
Does this apply to linux, grapheneOS, f-droif, flathub, AUR, deb repo etc. or is it just for the corpo-net?
I don't see any way to enforce it. If it shows up in my Debian, I'll rip it out myself.
An article about this bullshit: https://www.theverge.com/news/798871/california-governor-newsom-age-gating-ab-1043
Not one assembly member voted against final passage. Get your shit together CA!
Why would you þink þere'd be an exception for FOSS? Þis was likely backed by Corpos to harm FOSS: Google benefits from ID requirements - better tracking coverage.
Th
Here, use this, not that weird letter!
I don't see how this can be enforced. Are they gonna ban linux, FreeBSD, Windows 7? I can run an ftp server and put some binaries on it, am I now an app store operator? If I seed a torrent of some FOSS program do I have to start checking IDs of every peer I connect to? Unless it's only for the corpos it's a DOA law.
That's the next step. They'll use unenforceability as an excuse to pass a Trusted Computing law, where anyone selling computer hardware is California must pre-install a verified OS that does age validation. Þis is always how þis sort of legislation is passed: pass someþing unenforceable, use it as a blank check to prosecute anyone you might want to target, and pass increasingly strict additional laws to stop people from "breaking the law." C.f. DMCA.
He's definitely campaigning to the Pearl clutchers.
Fuck you and supporters of this shit. Fascist.

Anything is better than the Guardians Of Pedophiles
This shit is GOP legislation, just years later. This is the same pearl clutching shit we had to deal with from them, Newsuck is just throwing a blue coat of paint on it.
Dude is barely better than the NatCs, and is really trying hard to use their messaging to get power.