this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2276 readers
138 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Want to wade into the sandy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

(page 2) 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

apologies for just linking to my own bsky post but I'm lazy: https://bsky.app/profile/scgriffith.bsky.social/post/3m4qjnkeyls23

tl;dr I've gotten a bit suspicious that "AI users will be genocided" posts on reddit are a nazi op

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 7 points 23 hours ago (9 children)

It's been a while since I used Reddit. Is the thesis that subscribers to ChatGPT will be rounded up and killed? By whom? For what stated reason? It sounds like a weird inversion of victimhood, considering the number of GenAI user (even if they're just casual users) and the massive money and hype around GenAI by companies and way too many govs.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] a_certain_individual@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Boss at new job just told me we’re going all-in on AI and I need to take a core role in the project

They want to give LLMs access to our wildly insecure mass of SQL servers filled with numeric data

Security a non factor

😂🔫

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like the thing to do is to say yes boss, get Baldur Bjarnason's book on business risks and talk to legal, then discover some concerns that just need the boss' sign-off in writing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Checked back on the smoldering dumpster fire that is Framework today.

Linux Community Ambassadors Tommi and Fraxinas have jumped ship, sneering the company's fash turn on the way out.

[–] Seminar2250@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

I just saw this. I sent an email to Framework a few days ago asking if they would delete my account and letting them know this was the reason.

[–] Seminar2250@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Like a complete fucking idiot, I paid for two years of protonmail right before discovering they are fascists. I would like to move to another provider. I have until August. I have been considering Forward Email. Anyone have thoughts on this provider or recommendations?

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 21 hours ago

haven't seen them before, but a short tour around their infra/systems providers isn't particularly exciting - depending on both your threat model and what-you-want in a vendor

some parts/pages do provide some detail in encouraging depth, but I'd have to do a much more full review to give you a good answer

there's been a couple of "where email" threads over the last year, tuta's still one of the top options on that but you can check the threads if you want to see some of the other promising options

[–] macroplastic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago

I'm in the same boat. From what I've read I am planning on migrating to tuta when it runs out.

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 22 hours ago

I am using posteo.de. They are good but I dislike that they have no option for using your own domain which makes switching provider really annoying. If I had to choose a provider again I would probably go with mailbox.org.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gerikson@awful.systems 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Thoughts / notes on Nostr? A local on a tech site is pushing it semi-hard, and I just remember it being mentioned in the same breath as Bluesky back in the day. It ticks a lot of techfash boxes - decentralized, "uncensorable", has Bitcoin's stupid Lightning protocol built in.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago

fuck nostr. flere and fullsquare covered the details well tho

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

nostr neatly covers all obsessions of dorsey. it's literally fash-tech (original dev, fiatjaf, is a right-wing nutjob; and current development is driven by alex gleason of the truth dot social fame), deliberately designed to be impossible to moderate (“censorship-resilient”); the place is full of fascists, promptfondlers and crypto dudes.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 5 points 22 hours ago

gleason is also responsible for soapbox, which is pleroma frontend (or maybe fork?) used as far as i know exclusively by nazis (which also makes defederation easier)

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

did you also see the FUTO shit? it's getting Red String On Corkboard bad to track all these fuckers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

exploding-heads, openly trumpist lemmy instance, fucked off there when admin got bored of baiting normal people, make of that what you will

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 6 points 22 hours ago

flashback: even back then handful of regulars objected that nostr is packed with cryptobros and spam, so it's like that for 2y minimum

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago

Jack Dorsey seems to like throwing money at it:

Jack Dorsey, the co-founder of Twitter, has endorsed and financially supported the development of Nostr by donating approximately $250,000 worth of Bitcoin to the developers of the project in 2023, as well as a $10 million cash donation to a Nostr development collective in 2025.

(source: wiki)

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More flaming dog poop appeared on my doorstep, in the form of this article published in VentureBeat. VB appears to be an online magazine for publishing silicon valley propaganda, focused on boosting startups, so it's no surprise that they'd publish this drivel sent in by some guy trying to parlay prompting into writing.

Point:

Apple argues that LRMs must not be able to think; instead, they just perform pattern-matching. The evidence they provided is that LRMs with chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning are unable to carry on the calculation using a predefined algorithm as the p,roblem grows.

Counterpoint, by the author:

This is a fundamentally flawed argument. If you ask a human who already knows the algorithm for solving the Tower-of-Hanoi problem to solve a Tower-of-Hanoi problem with twenty discs, for instance, he or she would almost certainly fail to do so. By that logic, we must conclude that humans cannot think either.

As someone who already knows the algorithm for solving the ToH problem, I wouldn't "fail" at solving the one with twenty discs so much as I'd know that the algorithm is exponential in the number of discs and you'd need 2^20 - 1 (1048575) steps to do it, and refuse to indulge your shit reasoning.

However, this argument only points to the idea that there is no evidence that LRMs cannot think.

Argument proven stupid, so we're back to square one on this, buddy.

This alone certainly does not mean that LRMs can think — just that we cannot be sure they don’t.

Ah yes, some of my favorite GOP turns of phrases, "no unknown unknowns" + "big if true".

[–] Seminar2250@awful.systems 8 points 1 day ago

This is a fundamentally flawed argument. If you ask a human who already knows the algorithm for solving the Tower-of-Hanoi problem to solve a Tower-of-Hanoi problem with twenty discs, for instance, he or she would almost certainly fail to do so. By that logic, we must conclude that humans cannot think either.

"I don't understand recursion" energy

[–] istewart@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago (8 children)
[–] JayGray91@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

As a gshock fan, the "democratization" of that initial gshock ring is amazing lol

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is a joke, right?

E: my enshittified brain thought that this was some kind of AI enabled smart ring that also told the time. This is kinda fun actually, tho I would never get one

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah it's real. As mentioned, they launched a limited metal ring model that was immensely popular. This is just them riding the wave.

[–] jonhendry@iosdev.space 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

Anything’s a cock ring if you’re brave enough

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›