this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
251 points (91.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

37997 readers
1167 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When I was a teenager, I went to church, and almost every ‘Christian’ there was a complete asshole. What makes it worse is that they try to justify it. This honestly made me think that if God and Satan were real, I’d want to know Lucifer’s story. Maybe he’s not actually ‘evil.’

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

The only way Christianity makes any sense to me within the real world (aside from it being not real) is if Satan wrote the Bible pretending to be God, while denigrating the good guy as the rebellious angel Lucifer. If Satan had written the Bible instead of God, would you expect more genocide, slavery, torture, and rape, or less? So why is there any in the first place?

Look at 2000 years of Christian history. As soon as they could, they usurped political power in the most powerful nation in the area; Rome. Then began slaughtering and torturing anyone anywhere who thought different. They claimed divine rights and authority. They committed genocide in every single nation on the planet over nearly 2000 years. They perfected the dark arts of torture. They conquered earthly territory and plundered earthly wealth. They slaughtered so many that they built orphanages the world over where they could claim divine morality, but also rape children for centuries.

What did Lucifer do exactly? He told the first people that God was a lying dick and they should rebel against him, as he did.

Wouldn't you?

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 minutes ago

I felt this way coming from the Midwest to down south. There are plenty of biggots west of the missippi too but folks like the west borrow morons are rare. Down south id hear biggots on the goddamn radio.

At least for the most part, as an outsider, Midwest churches were mostly just seen doing charities (like that's all Jesus asked them do for others...).

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

I think about this all the time. He probably just believes in science and kindness.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Anne Rice wrote an interesting book in the Vampire series on this, Memnoch the Devil, where the narrative is that Satan created a place for the souls to go that God otherwise would have extinguished in his cold hatred for much of humanity. Satan, who loved humans more than any other angel, rebelled against God's harsh treatment of them, and was cast down as a result.

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 hours ago

I like Satan because he brings presents to kids on Christmas made by elves in the North Pole, in exchange for some cookies and a kiss from Mom

[–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I mean the guy actually met God and decided to rebel. Meanwhile, we have to believe without evidence and assume he knows best. Sure, buddy, sure

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 30 minutes ago

If it were a democracy Satan would still end up in hell.

[–] LemUser@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Isn't this the theme of WICKED? The "good" people are wicked and the "wicked" people are good. Of course, anyone who has done DMT knows that the insectoid creatures, machine elves, aliens, angels, clowns, snakes and green lady are all good which does make you wonder if we have it all backward.

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

"I have no special regard for Satan; but I can at least claim that I have no prejudice against him. It may even be that I lean a little his way, on account of his not having a fair show. All religions issue bibles against him, and say the most injurious things about him, but we never hear his side." - Mark Twain

You don't have to look at Christians to think God isn't so good.

In the Bible, Satan kills 10 people, Job's children, and he did it with God's blessing while they were having a bet.

God killed entire cities, all the firstborn of a nation even down to the slave's children, killed everyone on earth except 8 people, killed a guy for picking up sticks, killed a guy for not allowing the ark of the covenant to fall, told the Hebrews to attack nations and kill every man woman and child in the land and was furious when they left a few alive, had a God-off to show he was more powerful and when the other side converted to believe in him he had them killed, killed David's son and had his 10 wives publicly raped, killed 42 children for making fun of a bald guy... the list goes on, not to mention that God told the Hebrews to have slave's, women were property and have to be killed if they ruin the one thing they were good for, their virginity.

Christians have weirdest relationship with the Bible. Many don't really read it. If they did, they'd be Jewish. Jesus said to keep the Jewish laws, but Paul said it's ok not to. Christians go with Paul instead of Jesus and generally disregard the Old Testament except the parts they think prove Jesus was the Messiah.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

The Old Testament is a monotheistically rebranded Epic of Gilgamesh. A lot of the themes were borrowed adapted and rebranded from there and other literature are the time. Even the monotheistic Jewish God Yahweh takes on the title of the supreme God in the Canaanite pantheon (El).

The Old Testament is a time capsule from 5000 years ago. There are some general concepts that can apply to a modern moral life but if you tried to follow everything it says in life today, it would be problematic.

The clear message in the Old Testament is one of God as the absolute and final authority. Its very clear that the message is one to keep people in check. Theres often bending of the rules and some degree of favoritism towards God's chosen ones. Does not give off an egalitarian vibe but religion is generally not meant for that. Its generally meant to reinforce hierarchical structures (and to get people to accept them even if they are the lowest rung on the ladder out of fear of God).

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 1 points 39 minutes ago

I agree in general but I can't think of anything in the OT that is taken from The Epic of Gilgamesh except the Noah's Ark story, which is a clear rip-off. And the 5000 years ago is too long, I think the oldest books are from the 8th century BCE.

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You can call yourself anything you want, and no one will stop you. Calling yourself a Christian, while violating every tenet of Christian teachings, does not qualify you as a Christian. I finally coined the term Hypochrists for people like that.

There are plenty of Christians who do follow Christian teachings, to one extent or another, and are generally trying to be decent people. Unfortunately, there are also large numbers of "Christians" who just use the name to justify their selfish behavior, hatred, and cruelty.

All large religions have, or have had, groups like that. Any social institution that can provide credibility is going to be abused as a tool to gain power by someone. It is appalling that the Hypochrists have become large enough, and powerful enough, to have taken over the popular image of what Christianity is.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

Hypochrists is a good one.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Dat Demiurge be at it again

[–] stingpie@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Popular Christianity is heavily based on paganism, which is incredibly ironic considering that paganism is generally posed as the antithesis of Christianity. The story of Lucifer is syncretized with the story of Prometheus, although Lucifer doesn't really benefit humanity at all. According to the popular interpretation, Lucifer is the origin of all evil, became a snake in the garden of Eden, and then tempted Eve to eat the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. However, the snake isn't actually connected to Lucifer in the text—that interpretation was added later to explain the problem of evil (why it exists if God is supposedly good)

The idea that Lucifer is insubordinate and violated the natural hierarchy is very old, but the idea that Lucifer is the origin of evil is relatively new.

Christian theology contains many holes like this because there's a tendency towards treating every word in the Bible as literal, where it may have been written allegorically or as a parable, as Jesus often did. (Just to be clear, Jesus did NOT write the Bible, I'm just pointing out that the writers of the Bible may have tried to replicate his style.) This issue is compounded when you include the Old testament, as it contains portions which are clearly mythological, but are nonetheless treated as fact by certain modern Christians.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I know next to nothing about christinanity and this little taste had a nice archeological vibe to it. Can I ask you a followup question? What do we know about Jesus' style? Are the different accounts of his life consistent enough that we can infer a style of expression?

edit I am reading this now

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Bible?wprov=sfla1

[–] stingpie@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

One thing we know about Jesus is that he was very good at using rhetorics. Other than the accounts in several books about him using rhetorical techniques very advanced for the day, there's also evidence that he was skilled enough to start a religion. But any information finer than that is hard to prove. The books are over a thousand years old, written at different times by different people, followed by several translations, so we can't know his exact word choice or style of speech with certainty. The closest to the 'source' are ancient Greek texts which were likely translated from some other language.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Wasn't "Lucifer" as a concept post-biblical? Obviously in the Torah you have The Satan, the judge on God's divine council. Lucifer is a post-biblical interpretation of various prophetic scripts to make Satan out to be the overarching "evil" of the bible. Which is funny because that interpretation of Satan (and God) comes from Zoroastrianism, which holds that there is a great good spirit and great evil spirit.

[–] sunflowercowboy@feddit.org 4 points 9 hours ago

Lucifer existed before but didn't become entangled with Satan until after christianity had roots. So it is a post biblical merge, but pre-biblical. The concept is older, the merge changed the focus of the concept.(69 is just number, until it becomes a joke as well.)

Satan and more properly the 'Devil' as is the main concept in modernity. This is due to the romans using this translation preferably from the Greeks. The devil then got most of their iconography from Pan and some roman art traditions. This is far more important than people realize. Anyways, all this was forming in the roman zeitgeist while Christianity was not canonical to the empire yet.

[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

I like the Gnostic explanation that the being who created the material universe was a lesser deity of some sort (I think they call it evil but I'd probably go with chaotic or something). It made people to have intelligent-ish beings to interact with, and it put the Trees of "Knowledge of God & Evil" and "Life" in the Garden (for some reason) but didn't want Adam & Eve to become knowledgeable & immortal.

In this telling, the "Serpent" is Jesus by which they mean the physical projection of the actual highest actually all powerful, all loving, etc etc god, and it wants to free A&E so it convinced them to eat the fruit.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

The concept of good and evil is actually very limiting and tends to raise people with twisted worldviews. Most intelligent people learn that morality is complex, reality is not black and white, and to wish harm upon others to ensure personal bliss is rather sociopathic and fucked up.

Christianity faces a major foundational dissonance. Early tribalist (in group, out group thinking) values that have to coexist with radical empathic universalism. They usually ignore the development of Jewish traditions, and it took priests centuries of dissertation to mesh both views together. But they are incompatible. To believe in clearcut good and evil, and also things like a reward heaven (an idea also eradicated in most Jewish tradition). One must learn to suspend empathy for the fellow human being. To be happy while knowing others are harshly suffering (aka "they deserve it"). To think that one's own cruelty will be forgiven just by saying a magical incantation is also fucked up.

Now, the solution given to it is not widely accepted, and is the source of schisms in different Christian cults. Jesus's message is that of universal forgiveness with radical empathy. The abolition of heaven and hell. But many intermediate concepts had to be inserted to make it make sense with organized religion. Like sin forgivenes through repentance, second coming prophecies to delay the forgivines, apocalyptic prophecies to delay the abolition of hell and other exceptionalist interpretations.

Anyways, I started rambling, but Christianity is incapable to be internally consistent as it is. And some dogmatic views require people to be actively assholes by definition.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

I think if a being like lucifer exist and is truly evil then it has tricked these 'christians' in to worshiping it instead of the god.

[–] r0ertel@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Being Christian or going to church doesn't make you a good person any more than a speed limit sign prevents people from speeding.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 27 points 19 hours ago (3 children)
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 11 points 18 hours ago

You ever read the three little pigs, from the perspective of the wolf?

The Bible is one side of a story.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] justsquigglez@leminal.space 31 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

As a man who works in retail, Lucifer was an employee who thought he deserved a raise, and maybe even take over as manager one day, but the current manager didn't like that so he sent Lucy to burn at the customer service desk (hell) for eternity.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Good chance what we call the Satan at some point we're originally a god from a pagan religion, like Beelzebub for example. If they were good that depends, if they were replaced in the first place perhaps that old religion was worst compared to what predates Christianity, another thing also is perhaps replaced because were forced to by the invaders.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 93 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Lucifer's crime was daring to question his father.

After being cast out he was put in charge of overseeing those that were deemed by that same father to be bad after death.

Seems to be a common link there, and it's not Lucifer.

[–] ICCrawler@lemmy.world 46 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

And then there's the book of Job, the entirety of which is a story where God and Satan make a bet over a guy named Job. Satan says Job is only faithful because of the wealth God has granted him. God says Job is genuinely faithful, and tells Satan he can put Job to the test. So Satan has the entire guy's family killed by bandits, he loses all his material possessions, and winds up plagued and homeless. Job mostly keeps his faith, yet he is persecuted by his friends (just verbally) who believe his sudden punishments are happening because he must have done something wrong and his faith must be false. Still, he holds out, mostly. Then, when Job finally starts to actually crack, God shows up as a fucking whirlwind and goes on a long-ass ramble about how great he (God) is, to which Job humbles himself. God's response to this is to praise Job. He then chews out Job's friends who persecuted him and demands they sacrifice 7 bulls and 7 rams and have Job pray for them because God is only gonna listen to Job, nevermind it was all a bet between God and Satan that led to this misunderstanding. Then Job is gifted twice what he had, 14000 sheep, 6000 camels, 1000 yoke of oxen, and 1000 female donkeys. A new family, with seven sons and three daughters, and of course the daughters are just the most beautiful daughters in the whole land. Then Job lived another 140 years. And this definitely makes up for the first family slaughtered, because the Bible says so.

Something something reading the Bible is the greatest proof you can ever need that it's bullocks.

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago

I liked the take on this story in good omens

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

hes also known as samael before the fall, or lightbringer, which is pretty much the opposite in his current form. plus there were other angels that fell with him, but they are more obscure and depending different texts?

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 6 points 15 hours ago

The name "Lucifer" also means "light bringer", and it can be interpreted to refer to his gift of the "light of reason" to humanity in the garden.

load more comments
view more: next ›