this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
672 points (99.7% liked)

Political Memes

9759 readers
1050 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago

It intentional.

The only reason means testing exist is so people get mad who gets it when they don't.

Instead of getting mad at the people preventing everyone from having it, they get mad at the people even lower who need it more.

The only way the oligarchs can keep balanced on top is if everyone is punching down.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2023/08/22/IMF-Fossil-Fuel-Subsidies-Data-2023-Update-537281

According to this 3 year old data set, US direct and indirect subsidies for the Oil and Gas industry ALONE account for ~750 billion per year.

Agricultural subsidies add another $30 billion per year.

Wal-Mart, just a single company, benefits from around 7.5 billion per year in public spending.

The US government literally hands our tax revenue DIRECTLY to the rich. And then says we have no money for SNAP. Like stop giving Lockheed and General Dynamics and BAE and Raytheon a trillion dollars a year. The US government is a machine for taking money from working people and handing it to the rich, just like pretty much every other aspect of society at this point.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Only because we keep gutting their funding, and making them stay 40 years in the past with documentation. They go after the easier marks.

If they had more resources, and they could modernize, they could more effectively go after the wealthy, but decades of "iRs bAD" propaganda has kneecapped their public perception, and their ability to do their jobs against billionaires.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While you're not wrong, part of the problem is that we can't just give the IRS money and cross our fingers that they'll go after the billionaires. Without any legislative teeth backing it up, there is a sizeable chance they'll keep going after the easy marks first.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

With enough resources they'll run out of easy targets faster and they'll have to go for harder ones.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah, and that's terrible. I don't want the IRS going after everybody that failed to report the $2 in royalties they get from their self-published book before they go after Amazon.

I want them to prioritize high-value targets over easy marks, and I don't think giving them a carte blanche is a way to achieve that.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

The funny thing is that all IRS inspectors (or the equivalent in other countries) always say the same: they go after the easy targets because they don't have resources to go after the hard ones. I assume they have to have a minimum work as finished.