this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025

164 points (98.8% liked)

World News

50620 readers

1871 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
- Blogsites are treated in the same manner as social media sites. Medium, Blogger, Substack, etc. are not valid news links regardless of who is posting them. Yes, legitimate news sites use Blogging platforms, they also use Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube and we don't allow those links either.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

lemmyAtom@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

164

Shein accused of selling childlike sex dolls in France (www.bbc.com)

submitted 1 day ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

France's consumer watchdog has reported the Asian fast fashion giant Shein to authorities for selling "sex dolls with a childlike appearance" on its website.

The Directorate General for Competition, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control (DGCCRF) said the online description and categorisation of the dolls "makes it difficult to doubt the child pornography nature of the content".

Shein later told the BBC: "The products in question were immediately delisted as soon as we became aware of these serious issues."

top 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 33 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I can see how this whole topic can be kind of tricky. Not letting a free citizen have sex with a child like doll is kind of like arresting someone for thinking about committing a crime. I am generally of the belief that people should be free to do as they please as long as what they do doesn't impinge on other people's rights and such. But this is one of those border cases. Making it illegal without proof that it leads to crimes is questionable. But waiting for the proof means some children were abused, which is unacceptable as well.

Also, a guy could just buy one of those things that is lower torso and upper legs only. Nothing on it implies an age. So he can think of it as a child in his head. Yet making those illegal seems a stretch. Maybe it would have to be something like all sex dolls need to include enough parts to clearly distinguish them from children? But even that would be hard to truely define.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I think there may be some social issues with a for-profit company being financially incentivized to promote and sell pedophilia to people.

How would you rather deal with this? A boycott? Do you have money in child sex doll manufacturing that you can withhold?

So he can think of it as a child in his head.

That's not really what this is about. You're trying to assess this on a personal freedom level when what we're talking about is a guy with a megaphone.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

God, giving capitalism a financial incentive to advertise pedophilia is a new nightmare to me now, thanks

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

I really don't understand what you are saying. I was in fact looking to open a discussion on a personal freedom angle. But the specific topic here was just what got me thinking about it. "A guy with a megaphone". I really have no idea what that is referring to.

I did suggest that all sex toy type products could maybe be required to have some dimension that clearly marks the item as representing an adult. That would be my suggestion. But I am still curious where people draw the line on personal freedom vs something that isn't proven to be harmful. Drugs and such are another good example. Should people be allowed to do whatever dtugs they want, as long as they don't drive or something. Alcohol actually follows that example. Guns do to. Lots of ways to frame the debate.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

The danger is in sexualizing children, it's not a normally occurring part of human sexuality, and if people can sexualize children easily that can lead to sexual abuse of actual children, and that's always harmful, seems like a 2=2 type of thing to say, but it is. Anyway, modern psychology shows that therapy for people who do sexualize children, who haven't actually abused any children in any way, are unlikely to ever abuse children, so the doll or child sex abuse images, or other 'outlets' of sexual behavior aren't shown to reduce the likelihood of sexual abuse, but therapy does. They don't need sex dolls, they need therapy. And then maybe a healthy sex life with an adult.

[–] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 hours ago

This feels a lot like the "violent video games cause violence" argument, but because it's about child abuse, people don't want to defend it.

Are there actually any studies supporting your comment? I briefly looked and couldn't find anything.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

See now that brings up a good question. Is there any evidence that shows that child like dolls lead to an increase in abuse of children? If so, then this is a bad example for the personal freedom vs percieved threat question. But I am not sure I have heard of any such evidence. Maybe it's just neutral. That said, whether it be this, or the right to do drugs in your own home, or the right to assisted suicide, or even the right to alcohol. The question I am asking is, where is the line between needing to have evidence versus having percieved evidence?

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

It's a question that will likely never be answered. Is it worse to have a child-like sex doll or a horny pedophile with no legal outlet?

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

I would investigate the buyers of such product.

[–] Icytrees@lemmy.today 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

More information from Australia, if anyone's as morbidly curious as I was. Do not click unless you crave depression.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-26/child-sex-dolls-sold-on-temu-and-shein/105636720?future=true

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 22 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Very detailed article and covers well how the loopholes are being exploited.

But I can't help but wonder, why are they called child sex abuse dolls? No children are being abused in this case, so wouldn't what other news outlets use (just "child-like sex dolls" be more accurate? Otherwise wouldn't these be equivalent to calling violent video games "murder simulators"? Feels a bit like a slippery slope. Especially since the article ncludes dolls with adult features in the mix too.

[–] Icytrees@lemmy.today 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I'm talking (mostly) out of my ass here, but it's probably because calling them "child sex dolls" might be seen to normalize the concept of sex with children. Since AI child porn is illegal, makes sense that a child sex doll is, too.

edit: Looks like there's a thing in Australian law where they are legally considered sexual abuse material.

[–] ICCrawler@lemmy.world -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's being over the top in the way it's saying "sexualizing childeren = bad," but at the same time, yes, it is bad. So, eh. It does give the article a sort of strongly PC coded vibe. I'm sure it was written by a leftist the right would call woke. Take what you will from it, despite the language used, the article is still sound.

[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

it is because in australia, materials used for sexual gratification involving minors is called child sex abuse material.

is that woke now? anti pedophilia messaging is woke now?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

This is the same country that tried to ban small chested adult women from adult films and were going to have a government "breast inspector".

Billionaires have private sex islands. I can't be arsed to care about the rights of a pile of silicone.

[–] ICCrawler@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Can it, dude, I'm not on that side of the political aisle. I'm not in Australia and the knowledge it had to do with that was not known to me nor posted here at that time. But you bet the right would still call it woke, there's a reason they're hiding the epstein files. This isn't some gotcha, you're just a wanna-be hater.

[–] ICCrawler@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Oh boy, I am already clinically depressed, what's there to lose?! Jokes aside, reading through the article and how these companies get away with selling the product piece meal or relabeling it reminds me of how gas stations used to sell crack pipes.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/daviddisalvo/2012/07/12/a-rose-in-a-glass-by-any-other-name-is-a-crack-pipe/

No matter the era and no matter the addiction, someone is trying to make a legal buck off it if they can.

[–] Icytrees@lemmy.today 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

With manufacturing becoming more decentralized it's only a matter of time before people can print their own.

It'll probably be used as a reason to license and monitor 3D printers.

[–] ICCrawler@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I got where you're going with that, but presently, 3D printers were, to my knowledge, in the business of printing hard objects. So I double checked and looked it up. Turns out silicon printing does exist, but it's currently pretty small-scale stuff. Gaskets and the like. But in the process I bumped into a different idea. 3D print the molds used to shape the silicon, then just fill them.

So yeah, you're probably right.

[–] Icytrees@lemmy.today 3 points 22 hours ago

This is a good point. I used to share a studio with an entrepreneur who 3D scanned people's parts to make home printed molds for custom candles.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Some of these look not unlike anime characters posted in various lemmy subs.

[–] Icytrees@lemmy.today 8 points 23 hours ago

Don't get me started on paedo bait anime.

I used to help moderate a porn app, had to leave for my own sanity. Got hard to tell if I was blocking legit perverts or people so isolated and brain rotted they forgot what an adult woman was supposed to look like. Too much darkness either way.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

My first two weeks of lemmy were spent stomping out the little girl anime and furry porn. I would never admit to using this site in IRL. Imagine someone checking it out on my recommendation.

"So, uh, what's your favorite part of lemmy? The little girls kissing or the humanoid wolves with giant dongs?"

[–] tuff_wizard@aussie.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

Yeah if you start them on the right server they would have to go looking for the weird stuff… at that point you just say “wow that never came up for me, it must be the algorithm “

[–] Icytrees@lemmy.today 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Where did you find these wolves? So I can avoid them.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Assuming that the instance is still up, probably somewhere in:

https://lemmyverse.net/communities?query=yiff&nsfw=true

[–] Icytrees@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

Thank you but I regret everything. But thank you.

[–] Quexotic 6 points 19 hours ago

Ice seen screenshots of what look like real doll children on Amazon. You can be damn sure I won't be searching it up to give you examples.

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

Don't kink-shame the French politicians who have needs too.