this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
318 points (99.7% liked)

politics

26243 readers
2678 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Michigan defense lawyer is disputing FBI allegations that his 20-year-old client and four other young suspects were planning to carry out a terror attack on Halloween weekend.

Authorities with the FBI and in Michigan have offered few details about the case, however as he announced the arrests on Friday, FBI Director Kash Patel said more information would be released. Spokespersons for the state and national FBI and the U.S. Attorney in Detroit did not immediately respond to messages Saturday.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Americans are so inadequately inept at stopping crime, that I wouldn’t be surprised if one day the President of the United States of America was compromised by the Russians and started destroying their country to favour their holders.

Could you even imagine that happening? Luckily it’ll never happen with Kash on the job.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Pfft that's as likely to happen as anyone ever electing another Bush."

  • me circa 1999
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

There's a Jon Lajoie song called "Pop Song". It's basically a song mocking how all radio friendly pop songs sound the same.

The reason I bring this up is there is a 3 second clip of the song that I wish were isolated on youtube.

The lyric is something along the lines of:

"And you assume the general public would be too smart to listen to the same fucking song again......BUT YOU WERE WROOOOOONG!!!!!"

And I want that part at the end, "BUT YOU WERE WROOOOONG!!!" to be isolated. I want to post just that 3 seconds when someone says something that's clearly wrong, or will be proven wrong soon.

Kind of like when the kids say vapes are healthy, unlike cigerettes. Then as they get the news from their doctor that they have a new previously undiscovered strain of cancer, they'd tell the doctor they thought vapes were safe.

BUT YOU WERE WROOOOOONG!!!!

And I'd like to play that sound clip to you, circa 1999. Then we'd inevitably talk about The Matrix. Because it's 1999.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Inadequately...inept.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The first clue was the notion that the FBI is capable of stopping a terror attack. The FBI has a storied history of being completely incompetent, and I really don't think that Kash Patel is capable of the level of leadership and rational thought required to change that.

Previously, they were at least good at entrapping poor misguided people whom they gave plans and weapons to, only to sweep them up at the last second after helping to create the situation so they could scream "We stopped a terrorist." A terrorist they were also actually responsible for creating.

Yet I agree, I don't think Kash Patel's FBI is even able to do that convincingly or successfully.

[–] jonne 12 points 1 day ago

Basically every 'terror plot' they've uncovered since 9/11 involved the FBI working out the plan and providing everything to the suspect, but somehow without it crossing the legal line into entrapment.

[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I mean that's just defense lawyering 101. It'd be more surprising if he didn't make this statement.

[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Another set of Trumped up charges.

Probably arrested them for a killer kegger that they had planned