467
Pentagon admits it doesn't 'positively ID' people before boat strikes kill them: lawmaker
(www.rawstory.com)
That's called murder.
this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
467 points (99.8% liked)
politics
26257 readers
3073 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It still would have been otherwise. This just makes it WORSE murder.
“Pentagon admits it just murders people whenever it feels like doing a little murder.”
Straight up murder
It's called the Geneva Suggestions for a reason
Pentagon admits it is committing acts of war and war crimes.
Fixed that for you.
Nothing new
Bush, Obama, and Biden and presidents before all did the same in Afghanistan and Iraq and elsewhere. If a person in a certain area was a "military aged male" they were a valid target, and they would rarely verify who they actually killed after doing a drone strike. They would bomb a families house based on a tip from one person with no other evidence and never check to see if it was accurate. Trump is just more open about it now and doing it closer to home.
I think doing this outside of any pretext of a military conflict is certainly a big escalation but I do agree that our failure to push back adequately against these past crimes led us here.
Even if they were smugglers, killing them on sight.
This is fascism
One of the US's first wars was against the Barbary pirates in the late 1700s. They killed them on sight.
That doesn't make it fascism. What makes it fascism is that there has been no effort to confirm that the targets are actually engaged in drug smuggling. It's all because Miller and Trump say so.
It's fascism and we don't have to play devil's advocate or make fine distinctions. Government is operating outside the law performing summary executions. It's fascism even if they are drug smugglers. This isn't the 1700s
They are fascists. This isn't what makes them fascists. This is what makes them murderers. So they are pedophiles who enjoy fascism and murder.
Distinction without a difference. Whom does it serve to not call them fascism or anything they do? Oh, the government are murderers, never mind
Nobody wasn't calling them fascists. They said that the act of high seas murder was not, by definition, fascist. Fascism is what they are doing domestically.
Summary: they are fascists but attacking fishing boats with fighter jets is outside of that and also wrong.
I know but why not call their actions fascist? They're doing it because they're fascists. It's not a coincidence. Who benefits from us discussing the finer details of when a murder is fascist or fascist-adjacent or only Dr murderer is the fascist but the action isn't... Like, why?
Because words mean things. Blowing up those boats is terrible, probably even terrorism, but just being awful behavior doesn't make it fascist. They're doing lots of fascist shit, and those things should be called out as such and need to be dealt with by the American people. Terroristic, colonial crimes against humanity are separate and need to be dealt with by the international courts. Details matter. Don't dumb down the situation. Don't dumb down yourself. Everything being simplified and made digestible and minimalized to spoon-feed the stupid fucking masses is what got us here. It's fucking lazy. And look, I shouldn't blow up on you like that, but I'm frustrated. I grew up watching the same fucking people who put these fascists in power make fun of Trump for being an obvious idiot, a sleaze, and not as rich as he claimed to be. Those people got lazy as they got old, and I guess the leaded gas had put enough holes in their brains that they started to believe the fucking liars. And let worse and worse people gain power over things like their kids education so that they could teach them "the answers" instead of how to find answers. So now I'm ranting, and there's no chance you'll bother reading all this. Your previous comments tell me that. I'm still gonna hit send, so here you go.
Well if words don't mean anything, why use them?
Did you know qevlarr is a murderer? By which I mean they are a user on lemmy, of course.
White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly said that complaints about the strikes were an effort to "distract" from the ongoing government shutdown.
We can be angry about multiple things at once, like the Trump admin killing random people in boats, and the Trump admin disappearing thousands of immigrants, and the Trump admin pressuring congress to avoid negotiating lower Healthcare costs, and...
What do we call it when we kill people with no just cause?
Shoot first, ask questions later? You would usually expect such behavior with pirates and criminals. What a way to go for a "civilized" country.
Why?
As in, why admit it? The current US administration is mask-off evil and very little is being done about it. They lie constantly because there are no checks/balances and it's an idiotic system.
...so why admit anything like this?
As a fuck you to everyone else. It is very much a "what are you going to do to stop it?"
That's a fair point, now you mention it.
the more blatant the rule breaking the more humiliating it is for the powerless to nod and accept their fate
and that makes them happy
Absolutely a demoralization tactic.
And it’s working- Americans have already given up on doing a single damn thing
They still have to give some veneer of accountability to Congress to keep the Republican Representatives in line. This wasn't a Pentagon spokesperson going to the media, this was a legislator talking to the media after being briefed by the Pentagon.
"They said that they do not need to positively identify individuals on the vessel to do the strikes," Rep. Sarah Jacobs (R-CA) told CNN following the briefing.
The lawmaker pointed to the Pentagon's admission to explain why the Trump administration "could not actually hold or try the individuals that survived one of the attacks is because they could not satisfy the evidentiary burden."
So essentially; The cops think there is a meth lab in a low income apartment building. This seems reasonable with some circumstantial evidence. To solve the problem, they kill all the residents of the building, light it on fire, and burn it to the ground. No evidence is left and innocent people may have been killed, but that somehow isn't a problem for the people in charge?
Yeah, except for the "seems reasonable, with some circumstantial evidence" part.
Instead, we have nothing to back it up but the wild claims of a hysterical fascist. This isn't even a "don't like your face" level of circumstantial evidence. It's closer to "all foreigners are criminals."
More like "the cops can't get a search warrant, so they park outside and shoot through the windows, hoping someone fires back".
"well they blew up the Chicken man in Philly last night, and they blew up his house too"
Seems like permission to not ID ICE agents before killing them.
"ICE agents"? I only see fascist pigs who kidnap people.
Protect your fellow citizens by shooting these criminals on sight.
You shouldn't shoot federal agents, but if you see someone being kidnapped? Shoot, and never ask. Because federal agents don't kidnap people, they protect them - ergo, these are dangerous criminals that need to be shot on sight.
Are you taking orders, or are you taking over?
We just kill when the mood strikes. It's not a big deal.