this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
81 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

10612 readers
445 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

'We will have to do less of some of the things that we want to do,' Carney says

[...]

"The upcoming budget will balance the operating deficit in three years by reducing wasteful government spending and doing more with less," Carney said. "But the fact is, even with such efficiencies and with better management, we will have to do less of some of the things that we want to do, so we can do more of what we must do to build a bigger and better Canada."

It remains unclear exactly what those sacrifices will be or how they will be distributed.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago

tomorrow is budget day, let's see what comes of it. Perhaps our finance minister will need to cancel Disney+.

TAX THE FUCKING RICH

[–] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

Tell the creditors to fuck off.

Reduce protections for copyrights and patents for 14 years.

Don't buy overpriced American-industrial-complex crap.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

The sacrifices are not the insane amounts of defense spending and fossil fuel subsidies I assume.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've scaled back my discretionary spending so much. I don't go out half as much as I used to. I don't spend at restaurants nearly as much. Cut back on subscriptions everywhere. Vacations? Maybe once a year now, and they've been more locally focused. Really focused on the basics and savings. Not sure what else there is to "do less" with after that. Is he talking about housing and food? :/

[–] tangonov@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 days ago

I'm so sick of hearing from Pollieve on everything. The damn thing opens up with his yapping. If only we get to re-hire ourselves when we lose our jobs

[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 52 points 2 days ago (14 children)

I’m all for reducing the deficit responsibly but what’s with the neoliberal obsession of balancing budgets? This isn’t a business, you’re caring for a nation.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Exactly. Everyone always yammering on about how Canada Post isn’t profitable. Are police forces profitable? Is road infrastructure profitable??Those questions are never asked.

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right???? Our geography dictates that there is no way to both be profitable and ensure that all areas of the country have access to mail service, which remains how much government correspondence is handled.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All physical government correspondence should go through Canada Post/Expresspost. Amazon/UPS anything American should be banned from all levels of Canadian government.

Agreed. By much correspondence, I was referring to how there are still some services that have not migrated to digital alternatives.

Mail should be considered a utility like electricity and access to potable water. It shouldn't be restricted to profitable areas.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 40 points 2 days ago

Demanding more of the rich is a sin under the church of capitalism.

[–] thehowlingnorth@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago

When all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

They aren't balancing the budget, just jettisoning stuff they didn't like and running a deficit.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sacfrices is politcal speak for austerity. Who pays the price? The plebs. The government can never ask the richies or the corpos to shpulder the burden. Those parasites are job creators.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And just carefully structure laws and regulations so companies can continue to abuse foreign workers, to erode the fabric of our country.

[–] Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I don't know about you but our family has been making tough choices for years now while your cronies get richer Mr. Carney.

No war but class war.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Canada has had the worst inequality in its history under Justin Trudeau. People need to move past the broken 2-party system.

100% we have two parties that seem to only serve the lobbyists, but we only end up voting for both these parties which leaves them with no incentive to change their ways.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Already will never have stable housing, there are no jobs, food is beyond pricy, we’re burning from climate change and this fucking wanker banker wants us to sacrifice - more?? Get fucked.

[–] rozodru@pie.andmc.ca 29 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The fuck is left to sacrifice Carney? We've been struggling for years. most of us can't afford rent or eat. there's nothing left to sacrifice.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

THIS. I say don’t pass the budget, have an election and we’ll reduce his minority further by electing more NDPs (cause progressives are already tired of having loaned Carney their vote) and with yet another election loss - end Polievre’s career once and for all.

[–] fourish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I propose that the leader of the opposition no longer needs a residence at taxpayer expense. No housing for losers.

[–] grey_maniac@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Human sacrifice? Billionaires and separatists to start.

[–] GuyLivingHere@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Like the entire UCP? I'm down

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago

Sacrifices for thee but not for mee.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I can't believe the bank bro would do this

But you HAD to vote for them or the conservatives would cut your healthcare!

It's just too bad there's no third party in Canada.

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago

Yup if we want real change we need ranked choice voting and proportional representation. It's the only way get rid of their safe seats.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

The people who need to hear this are not here.

[–] Scotty@scribe.disroot.org 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Maybe it's just me but I don't get what 'those tough choices" will be Canadians could soon face. The report discusses mostly the use of the word "sacrifice" by Carney and others, while only one expert makes a very rough guess what that could be in just one sentence at the end of the article.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I suspect that they'll lower the wages and expense allowances for MPs. Haha jk.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

This is a story in a theme of stories that's been developing since we elected this government. Not every story has all the detail that's been shared in the theme so far. Carney's asked almost all departments of government to find 15% of cuts. Given how underfunded and understaffed lots of then are, the impmications of that have been discussed before and the consensus is that it would lead to significant harm to many Canadians, especially more vulnerable people. For example, already the staffing shortages in the CRA are causing people hours in wait to sort their tax returns when something goes wrong. VIA rail service is bad and it's gonna get worse and more expensive. Etc.

[–] LoveCanada@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Western Canada: "You have VIA rail service?"

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Western-er Canada: "your tracks are in trainworthy condition?"

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Looking at the 50s passenger rail map radicalizes me.

[–] Scotty@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I know about this. I would have just expected to read about specific sacrifices after reading the headline. So now you can make your own guess as it's more a clickbait headline imo.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

I would have just expected to read about specific sacrifices after reading the headline

This is mostly another pre-budget statement to try and reduce the level of shocked surprise when we see the actual budget.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I should have known it's not a good faith question. My bad.

[–] slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Tough choices at the polls, amirite!?