this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
215 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

13681 readers
144 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Across the US, people are increasingly defaulting on their car loans — a dire economic indicator because these loans are usually the last payment Americans are willing to miss. Meanwhile, auto insurers are raking in record profits after hiking rates.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Alarming? Looks to me like cheaper used cars will now be on the market.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I have a neighbor who's afraid to turn her gas furnace on because she's been shut off mid-winter for high bills she can't pay.

Another friend had her electric shut off this week and is struggling to find resources.

It's not just cars, everyone making under $60k or $100k for couples is in dire straits right now. Even people making low 6-figures are living paycheck to paycheck. It's insane to watch it all build up.

[–] excursion22@piefed.ca 9 points 1 day ago

No one went to jail the last time subprime loans in the US crashed the global economy, why would anything change? Might as well do it again.

[–] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So, anecdotally, I had to go vehicle shopping for work, I was talking to a guy who doesn’t have good credit. I go, “how was buying a car for you? I’m nervous cause I don’t really have credit.”

Dude goes “yeah, honestly, I was told they stopped doing credit checks, I put down my companies gross income as my gross income and they just ran with it.”

“That sounds like the car version of 2008?”

“Hahaha yeah, I guess it is.”

Now, when I had to buy a truck, they did run a credit check, and I ended up needing a co-signer, but, none the less, interesting to hear that, then see this article.

Edit: I should also note, I needed a co-signer for a not insane interest rate. The bank would still loan to me personally, just at 17.5%. So, I mean, he’s probably right. I’m not sure you get actually turned down. Dude has 2 judgements against him.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The bank would still loan to me personally, just at 17.5%

That's how banks tell you they're not interested.

[–] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 3 points 21 hours ago

You’d think there’d be a threshold where they just say “no” though?

I’m not shocked I got approved, even with that interest rate, my credit isn’t bad, just non existent.

I’m shocked my friend got approved with 2 judgements. What’s the point of a judgment? I suppose I don’t know the details, they could be old, etc. just seems irresponsible.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good to see banks learned nothing from sub prime mortgages and derivatives in 2008.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 21 hours ago

They learned that, as long as DC is corrupt, they'll always get bailed out.

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

These are the real consequences of greed running rampant. People need cars to get to work, this has a severe impact on economic activity. I'm almost certain we have been in a recession since the beginning of October.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 54 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I have an idea how they can make cars cheaper. How about make them smaller and remove the spying equipment

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

But no one will buy them. Men need penis trucks, Karens need 6000lb SUVs to carry a 12lb baby.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Without the spying would make them cost more. The spying is what they consider a feature to keep pricing down a little since they will make money off of that. They will pass a little of that savings onto the consumer.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You think they actually pass those post-sale earnings on to the customer as savings? Why would they, when they could have their cake and eat it too? The average price for a new vehicle topped $50k recently, so they’re clearly not worried about keeping prices down.

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Post purchase monetisation go brr

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

I'd gladly pay more, if only that feature were offered

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, don't look at all those obvious signs that the economy is going down the crapper. Just look at that squiggly line that is definitely not being propped up by the false circular investments in the AI bubble.

[–] IllNess 16 points 2 days ago

The average price for a new vehicle topped a record-breaking $50,000 in September. Meanwhile, auto loan delinquency rates are at all-time highs for those with subprime credit ratings — those with credit scores below 670 — doubling since 2021 to reach 6.43 percent. The default rate is now worse than during the last three recessions: the COVID-19 pandemic, the Great Recession, and the dot-com bust.

Seems like you and the article are on the same page.

[–] xlf42@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Not enough people do the math, whether moving and changing job into a neighborhood where the commute and daily errands would allow living car free would make you end up cheaper (it’s more than a loan and insurance, most cars want gas to move). Yeah… rent might be higher but it’s math worth doing and it will reveal how much work hours you spend just for keep your car moving.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 1 points 16 hours ago

NYC transit I think caps at $34/week, which I don't hit because I walk most places.

When I lived in the suburbs I did some math about the cost. I was paying like $300/mo for transit into the city, plus all the other car coats. Moving in meant rent went up some, but I got rid of the car. Big win, in my case.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The average US household spends 17% of its budget on transportation. Obviously other forms of transport also cost money, but it still nearly possible to have a four day work week, if you get rid of your car.

[–] Quexotic 11 points 1 day ago

I'd argue that US infrastructure is so spread out due to being car centric that no, it's not.

I see your point, and fuck cars, but it's baked in, sadly.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fascinating. I spend about 2% here in Germany, for two good bikes (which I bought used) including professional maintenance, plus a monthly commuter rail pass. No car. Roughly a four-day week.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I feel like places to work are not usually by places to live, and that's an awful lot of commitment to a job that may not last.

I guess it depends on your inventory me level.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It is not by chance that the 2008 financial crisis was unleashed by the bankcruptcy of an investment bank which was trading with shaky housing loans, leading to an investment bubble, which in turn was pinched just after prices for oil had passed 140 dollar per barrel. Which lead people to reconsider the rationale that you would live cheaper if you resign to living far away from work with super long commutes. It was the pheripherical suburbs far away from cities where that calculation broke down first, and houses became unmarketeable first.

That situation was then somewhat stabilized with quantitative easing and super cheap credit money, which also made energy extraction, and thus oil prices cheaper. Which essentielly means collectively borrowing money we can't pay back, to finance energy and a way of living we can't really afford. And states are still pumping more money into that.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

I would too if I decided I was grossly overcharged for a soon to be rusting behemoth.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

These sure look like signs that the consumer is not being protected. These problems used to be mostly solved, but apparently the government has un-solved them.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago

Yeah but that's just a necessary consequence of solving the much worse problem of having a banking and finance sector that lacked the freedom to shoot everyone in the future in the foot - faster and more often than their competitors.

Did you not see the horrors that FDR inflicted on the economy - if it weren't for his draconian banking regulations the 1920s would have lasted another two decades, and probably avoided WWII.

spoiler/s

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile, auto insurers are raking in record profits after hiking rates.

Well, rising premiums seem also related to climate change...

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Floods and Teslas. Those turds don't float, and they are written off for minor crashes.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

Weeeeee 🎢