this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
698 points (97.5% liked)

Selfhosted

52745 readers
345 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One of the best pieces of self-hosted software ever to exist.

Edit: This is Immich! for the folks who don't know.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rotkehle@feddit.org 12 points 4 days ago

using it for some months now and it's pretty much perfect already. never looked back to Google photos.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If it weren't Docker-dependant, I'd imagine this would be a good FreedomBox app.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Does it support multi-tenancy?

For instance, being a backup and media manager solution for multiple people in my family hosted on one server.

The same with a few friends that want to get out from under Google's thumb.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

It does, but it doesn't handle encryption at rest. Everyone needs to be aware that the immich admin can see their photos on the disk.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As someone who only used the stock synology app and has always wanted to try something else, what features and things does this do better? I am close to trying it out just to see. Im sure it will solve my 1 big issue where I can't control the location of photos that default to my application storage, which is pretty small, instead of my actual storage array.

[–] MinFapper@startrek.website 7 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Does everything Google photos does. Their app looks/feels exactly Google's app, including sharing links. Assuming you're running it on reasonably powerful hardware, it does all the same face recognition and ML based search that Google photos does.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

im like maybe one of few people who barely take photos. its great because i dont need to worry about the costs of cloud storage

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 days ago

I did the same after they revamped the backup functionality in the app, and it now finally seems to be trustworthy enough as my main method to get my pictures from my phone into the cloud. Could finally cancel my Google subscription as well.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (6 children)

One thing I don't get, if someone could explain it to me, is what's the point of immich over e.g. Nextcloud? Immich is just for photo and video, right? Why not just have a cloud file drive instead? To me, I feel like it's a waste to have both, since I use Nextcloud to both sync my PC and as a secondary backup, in which case I'd have two copies of my photos on my home server if I wanted to use Immich as well. Am I missing something or is it for people with different workflows?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›