this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
57 points (86.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

35374 readers
1347 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Do you think people would open their eyes and become more neighborly? Would it free people to actually talk to their friends, go to actual events in person? Or is everyone already entrenched too far?

And yes its ironic im posting this online. However I like to think of how the world would react if we could disable the internet for a few months. Besides the chaos of banking and airlines, I think it would be a net positive on humanity.

Until then, ill go back to being mostly disconnected on weekends. Its great.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I believe that the perfect internet is 1999 but with Wikipedia.

That’s it.

All tech: 1999 and before. Flip phones. MP3 players. DVD. Etc.

It was perfect and corporations did not suck our souls out through our assholes.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

100% agree, the Matrix was right.

[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

And it wasn’t a coincidence.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 55 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm on the internet because I can actually find others who share my intereste and have something to talk about. If the internet died, I'd be even lonlier.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I can see that, however there's the flip side that a lot of people are more lonely because of the internet and getting sucked into extreme viewpoints. If you didnt have the internet, there wold be poster boards for groups etc to join. If youre not in a city, that would obviously be tougher.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That sounds like a nightmare.

When I was in college, there was some Internet, but nobody lived on it like we do now. There were also a variety of clubs at college. I think I might have shown up for one club gathering and noped the fuck out.

The Internet doesn't keep us in. We built the Internet because we never wanted to leave.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

The Internet doesn't keep us in. We built the Internet because we never wanted to leave.

fediverse users tend to be more conscious about their internet usage, but I don't think this applies to the more popular social media sites that are built upon attention economy

[–] missingno@fedia.io 9 points 3 days ago

The internet is how I found groups for my most niche interests. I already know that some of my favorite games do not have any kind of local scene near me, but at least I can still play online. Some of these games I have to travel out to tournaments to play in-person once or twice a year, and I know those events wouldn't exist without first building up an online community to organize from.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Religion will become popular again and people still start falling for nonsense like ghosts and superstitions. People born after the 80s don't really remember just how batshit crazy people went for misinformation before we had the internet.

We need a new internet without corporate bullshit and some integrity in terms of knowledge. But seeing what happened to the current one, I don't think that will be possible until we kill capitalism.

Yeah an underground net would be great. I mean we do have the smallweb and gopher and lemmy, which is fine and I enjoy how unknown it is.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 days ago

The internet is helpful for finding community and support, especially for LGBT+ people, people with mental health issues, or neurodivergent people. I for one am very glad that the internet is very much up and that the legislators have not succeeded in fully censoring it.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Yes.

I grew up in the 70's where you'd run naked out of the shower to take a phone call, because that might be your only opportunity to be invited to a social occasion or event that day/week. Nobody ever turned down an invite to lunch, cards night, bingo, pot luck, watching vacation slides, etc, etc, etc. That was the chance to see the world, connect with people and hear what was going on.

I grew up when you'd read the same shampoo bottle 10 times every time you took a shit, hoping you'd find some new detail you once missed.

I grew up when reading every single word of the newspaper, literally from cover-to-cover was a normal thing, for want of better options.

So I feel if people were forced back into the system of non-instant communication, it would automatically make humans come back together. We are social creatures, and The Internet & SM is an ersatz version of socializing, but if it were gone people would have to find it in real life again.

[–] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I grew up when you'd read the same shampoo bottle 10 times every time you took a shit, hoping you'd find some new detail you once missed.

Tell me your family didn't have a subscription to National Geographic without telling me your family didn't have a subscription to National Geographic.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

We had that, but there's only so many times you can jerk off to the same pair of African titties

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You know, I'd judge you, but I've been a horny teenager without internet access as well.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

It beats JO to the bra/panties section in the Sears catalog

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

That was a truly weird case. You only heard about it because it was weird.

[–] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It would probably take a while but yes, I do think people would become less isolated.

People use social media as a substitute for social interaction, it is not. Even texting is not good enough most of the time.

[–] Mesophar@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago

I disagree that it would be as clear that people would become less isolated. I do agree that people would adapt to life without Internet; we were there once before, we can be there again. However, this dismisses the good the internet has done and neglects to account for the reasons it has turned out the way it has.

I think people would fall into tribalism offline as much as they do online. Maybe it would be regional and physical community based, and they would have more social interaction -in person-, but they would still fall into little insular pockets of one form or another. The cure is a variety of interactions with people of different mindsets, whether that is online or offline. But we, as people, don't like that. We like the comfy communities where we can form an echochamber together.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure we'd have a lot of blood on our hands. The internet does in fact facilitate medical appointments, records, and makes drugs and supplies more accessible.

[–] ethaver@kbin.earth 1 points 3 days ago

why are they booing you? you're right!

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago

That's rough. Don't wanna go outside, lots of armed masked men outside.

(Am a foreign-born non-white American)

Probably just have to to get a bunch of DVDs and actually get a DVD player that works since the old one is filled with dust and broken. (Or is it a "BluRay" these days?)

I'm probably gonna have to get ham radios, without the internet, there would be a lot more traffic, so I'd probably have to get comfortable using my voice. Probably get a shortwave radio so I get get foreign broadcasts. TV also needs to be replaced.

I'd have to get like actual encyclopedias.

Honestly, it'd be a pain. No piracy is gonna make things cost too much. I doubt Libraries would even have them since they'd all be loaned out.

TLDR: It'd suck, very fucking much.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

We could just get rid of Internet 2.0 - that's when the tech broligarchs took over the beautiful original internet and make it into a bunch of surveillance capitalist walled gardens with psyop addictive algorithms that turned people into ad-consumption cash cows.

Leaving the infrastructure in place for useful, non society-destroying uses would avoid throwing the baby out with the filthy bathwater.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 12 points 3 days ago

Honestly, I don't really believe people are fundamentally much different now than they were before the internet, I think people are just aware of negative events from a wider area now and that things that previously would have gotten blamed on something else get blamed on the internet instead.

[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What is 'the internet' to you? I think this term means different things to different people. I imagine to people born in the latest generations the internet is social media and productivity corpo sites. To them the internet is youtube, tiktok, twitter, reddit, their bank, and whatever slop services they subscribe to magically beamed into pocket computer through technomagical nerd shit like "5g" and processed through "microprocessors" and other stuff they' dont care to really understand because its all abstracted away.

I was born early enough for the internet to be nothing more than two computers barely powerful enough to run a GUI calling eachother up through telephone wires to share goofy web 1.0 blogspam. I remember when low res images were the norm and when pre-google youtube was just coming into being. When AOL and Myspace and Newgrounds/flash games. I remember being a kid and loving computers because I never knew what new cool website was on the horizon to discover and play with. I remember that people used things like newsgroups and pre-craigslist to meet up for transactions.

This is the internet, to me. At least what it once was and what it can be again. People using the digital landscape to freely express themselves with their own hardware. To come together to share in hobbies and interest and passions.

We could have that again if we all bought into a standardized radio based mesh network that could host personal sites while acting as a routing node.

But I don't know if the general public will ever be pushed to partake in this network. They would have to be squeezed very hard to try alternatives to the common way of things.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

I should say, destroy web 3.0, ha. But I was only looking at the negatives of internet which to me are social media, corporate takeover, and cheapening of human creativity.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 days ago

No. We are all online for lack of better alternatives, which wouldn't magically appear

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

no, people hated each other before the internet...even moreso than they do now. believe it or not, media giants has an easier time bubbling people pre-internet

[–] Mechaguana@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

No. Alcohol usage would go up in that scenario though.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Idk my neighbors are pretty openly racist and so are 90% of the people in my uni. Internet has few cool people at least.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago

before the internet people watched a lot of broadcast tv and rented videos a lot. now since there was a limited amount of media people did talk about popular shows a lot.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

There was a power outage in the Modwest in 2003 or so. It lasted a few days.

Businesses were mostly closed down, so everyone basically had a few days off. There was a life to the community that I had never experienced. People with generators were visiting old friends, running their fridges for a few hours at a time, and the parks were full. People were generally friendly and helpful to each other. Then after a few days, the power came back on and life went back to normal.

If we destroyed the internet, I wouldn't expect the same thing to happen. Businesses would readjust, and life would find a new normal (perhaps looking a little more like the 90s). But I doubt it would change much with how neighborly people are.

What seems to trigger that sense of community is a shared experience, especially hardships. So if things keep going downhill, a silver lining will probably be a renaissance of community.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think this would work because people weren't bigoted until the internet came about

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I hope you're being sarcastic.

I had hoped that was obvious....

My opinions reflect yours in your comment. The internet allows us to learn about and connect with people we may not see around us in our neighborhoods and I think that in of itself is instrumental in breaking down bigotry.

[–] BismuthYellow@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Maybe, depends on the people. Some neighbours might love to get back together like how they used to, others might start fighting again.

Personally i'd just quit on living. I highly doubt i'd find the same community where i currently am, i'm not going back to feeling completely alone and just faking my life again.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I can't talk about younger generations, I'm well into my 50s, but I know they do a lot of things online. Heck, they even date online which to me seems as odd as wanting to eat an... air sandwich (so odd that I'm half expecting some app to popup offering them to have virtual sex too... for a monthly fee, obviously). But even like that there are still a lot of people (of all ages) that prefer IRL/physical/analog to online/digital to a subscription-based lifestyle. They're just... less visible online (and they seldom complain about it online either) ;)

The thing with the Internet is that it creates this self-validation bubble, and I mean not just for political discussions where people expect to never have to listen to anything/anyone not agreeing with them, I mean it as a space itself, the Internet is good at downplaying alternatives to itself as a place to be and do things... Things like meeting people IRL, doing offline activities and hobbies. Who decided we needed to use a phone to watch a movie or to read a book or an app to meet someone we find attractive?

To me, all of that should have been one of the things education needed to talk more about to kids. If it ever tried, it obviously utterly failed. The real question being then: who decided we should stop doing all of those things our species have been doing for... ever. And why? And the answer may be as simple and obvious as: ourselves. It is us that did this to ourselves, it's our own laziness and maybe our own fear, and our own stupidity.

Until then, ill go back to being mostly disconnected on weekends. Its great.

I don't have dedicated offline days, but i do have a lot of offline time so allow me to congratulate you nonetheless on that decision and wish you had an even better WE than usual when you will read my comment. Because, you're 100% right:

Its great.

And not just on WE ;)

[–] moondoggie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

It’s not so much the internet as it is advertising. A lot of what we’re dealing with now came from the advent of 24 hour news networks. Prior to that, there was a half hour of local news and a half hour of national news twice per night and then a morning news show on each of three networks. Then 24 hour news networks came around and they had to fill that 24 hours with whatever would keep people glued to the channel so the network could pull in more ad revenue. That lead to more sensational stories and to other networks specifically catering to people’s baser emotions. Then the internet comes about and it all starts happening on a grander scale, working for clicks instead of ratings. There’s always people willing to encourage the worst of us as long as they can make a buck off of it.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

I live in a neighborhood where everyone has a smartphone. We still go out and spend time in person, have community events, know our neighbors.

It's not the Internet's fault. In most cases, it's lack of density, lack of parkspace, and lack of public transit. Suburbification, if you will. People don't go outside unless there's pleasant outdoor spaces to go to. People can't get to know their neighbors on the house-car-office pipeline, you need sidewalks and pubtrans and mixed zoning for that. You need front stoops and block clubs and people who have lived there for more than a couple years.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 days ago

The internet is probably much older than you believe ... by several decades ... so your question does not exactly fit with your worries.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Maybe if it was out for 3 or 4 hours each day. I think I'd like that.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

True.

The good news is any of us can disconnect at any time. Maybe I should have titled the post, what if we destroyed toxic social media, that seems like the actual problem.

[–] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

My friends and neighbours and I all use a variety of messaging services and apps like Spond to organise get-togethers, sporting events, working bees etc etc. I'm in a ridiculous number of WhatsApp groups, all very active, and I see most people in them irl regularly. Without the internet I don't know how we'd cope. It's hard enough herding cats in a group chat, imagine the number of phone calls we'd be making!

Yeah, most likely. People still would want to socialise so they'd force themselves out of their comfort zones. Also, the dummies wouldn't be so heavily propagandized so at least they'd have a chance to naturally grow out of blanket xenophobia, for instance.