this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
103 points (91.9% liked)

politics

26257 readers
3090 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump appeared to concede Wednesday that he's not allowed to run for reelection in 2028 — after teasing the idea of running for a third term on and off for months.

The 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1951, explicitly bars anyone from being elected to more than two terms as president.

Mr. Trump has periodically toyed with the idea of seeking another term. In some cases, he's seemed to bring up the idea in a tongue-in-cheek manner, offering up "Trump 2028" hats to friends and foes alike. But he told NBC News earlier this year he's "not joking" and he believes "there are methods" by which he could run for president again. And Trump ally Steve Bannon said in an interview released last week that "there's a plan" for Mr. Trump to win a third term.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 43 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What's too bad is that he hasn't choked to death on daddy putin's cock yet despite numerous attempts.

[–] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Kinda hard to choke on something the size of a paper clip

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We almost lost W to a pretzel. It can happen.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

#PatriotPretzel

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 36 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I think the author has misunderstood what the phrase “it’s too bad” means when Trump says it.

“It’s too bad it isn’t me who owns that building” always meant he was going to do whatever it took to own the building, for example. It’s how he expresses his desire to have something at any cost.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 days ago

The author heard a mob guy say "nice news outlet you have, shame if something happened to it" and took it as literal concern.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago

My little sister used to say "too bad I can't" as a way of asking permission

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 25 points 6 days ago (3 children)

He won't make it through this term, maybe not even a year from now. His mental and physical health are deteriorating really fast.

[–] Hellotypewriter@retrolemmy.com 24 points 6 days ago

Don’t give me hope.

[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I have two bottles of champagne ready to go. 🍾

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Vance might be worse then Trump...

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (1 children)

On the one hand, Vance lacks the cult appeal, so should lose a fair election in 2028. On the other hand, we might not have a fair election in 2028.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago

There needs to be a certain level of backing to subvert a whole election like that. Vance doesn't have it.

I do think it's hard to say if Trump will make it to the next election or not. I don't think he'll make it a decade, but even with obvious mental decline, he might make it to 2028.

[–] GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Vance doesn't have nearly the amount of support or trust he needs. He's sucked Trumps coat tails for far too long and every failing of this admin is being reflected onto him as much as Mango Mussolini.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's not about support. It's about the folks pulling the strings. If the architects and funders of project 2025 think that Vance (or Cruz, or MTG) is the puppet they want, then that's what we'll get.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago

No, that's not how it works at all.

MAGA is a cult of personality. All the folks "pulling strings" have to keep them together. They can't. They aren't the personality at the center of the cult. There are already significant fractures in MAGA, and without Trump being a focus point, they tear each other apart.

Real support matters. People "pulling strings" aren't magical.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

At this point it's a crapshoot.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago

No, it's a hint to his toadies to try harder.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This man loves the US so much. That is why he is the son of an illegal. Married an illegal. And has no respect for the constitution or the laws of the US. It’s just love. Y’all don’t get it.

He doesn’t even understand the basics of the Constitution.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 6 days ago

"it's too bad I can't run for a third term (I make a lot of money running) but it's ok, I just won't ever end my second term!"

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I think the plan is that he runs as Vance's VP and then Vance steps down on day one. I don't know if that is Constitutional. Can Trump appear on the ballot as VP? I should think not.

EDIT: Apparently, it's possible, but unlikely. https://cornerstonelaw.us/22nd-amendment-doesnt-say-think-says/

Probably it will come down to a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court, and it's not perfectly clear how they would rule.

Regardless, Trump will die sooner than later, so who is the GOP lining up as his successor, no matter whatever else happens? Who's next on deck for the GOP? Vance?

[–] vateso5074@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The 22nd amendment, which limits the president to two terms, also applies a restriction to a two-term president running as someone else's vice president.

The next option would be to have Trump be appointed as speaker of the house, which does not have any eligibility guidelines at all (like you don't even need to be an elected official first), and then have both the president and vice president abdicate.

But with all of the checks on power basically removed from the position, Trump would have to somehow find two sycophants who are both electable and would be willing to surrender absolute power just to give a sundowning octogenerian a third term.

[–] Atom@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Or, easier method. He runs. Democrats sue saying he clearly can't have a third term. SCOTUS declines to take the case because the constitution says he can run, he just can't be elected.

States wait for each other to take him off the ballot, since elections are state run and eventually none of them do because they waited too long and they are super-duper sure he won't win this time.

He wins, Sued again, SCOTUS declines to take the case because he's a sitting president and who are they to mingle in elections "we can't set a precedent of stealing elections from the people's choice" or something of that nature.

Opposition falls in line because, yet again, the majority of Americans decided he and the GOP were the best choice and they'll lose if they fight back. But really, if he wins a third term, GOP owns Congress and there's not a damn thing you can do about it anyway.

Boom, third term for Trump

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Basically, laws are only good if they're enforced. Otherwise they're just words on paper.

Yeah, I'm tired of the "x law says he can't legally do y action, so we don't need to worry about it" discourse that the media keeps amplifying. The executive branch is in charge of enforcement, and he's made it clear to congress that he has sole control of the branch, and he's wielded that power to break so many laws already.

It's not like there's some constitutional overlord that steps down from heaven to put him in jail if he tries to run again.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 5 days ago

Se can call one Romulus and the other Augustus, if it's not too on the nose

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 5 points 6 days ago

A few days ago someone laid down about 5 strategies, such as the one you say above, which might allow a '3rd term'. I wouldn't put it past them.

[–] Soktopraegaeawayok@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago

Obviously hes not getting a third term. Republicans dont generally want that. Its only the diehard maga group that thinks a 3rd term is a good idea, and its not, Obviously.