this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
122 points (94.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44207 readers
580 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey all. Getting right to it:

Last November, a majority of my wife's family voted trump. I immediately made known my disgust and that I had no interest in maintaining relationships with any of them. My wife is equally appalled, but family is important to her and she chooses to compartmentalise it for the sake of their relationships. That's her call. Typically, her mother comes to stay at our house for an extended period as we live far away, and this year I tolerated her being here for the sake of my wife.

But now, thinking about the next visit and how bad things have gotten, I can't even stand the thought of having her in my house, let alone being in the same room as her. I really don't want her here at all, but I will again tolerate her for my wife's sake. However I think it's likely that I will make myself pretty scarce during that time.

So the ethics question is - given that I expressed my distaste after the election but still remained cordial, is it ok, ethically speaking, to become more resentful as the consequences of their actions become more apparent? Or, given that what has happened since is pretty much out of everyone's hands, am I locked in to the level of hostility I showed immediately after?

I guess the distilled version is - a person does X, I express disapproval. Is it ethical to express MORE disapproval as additional unforeseen consequences of X become apparent?

Thanks for your thoughts!

Edit to Clarify - My mother in law is not MAGA and I don't think she's enjoying any of it. She thinks we can "just not talk about it" and everything will be fine. However she has become more racist and judgemental (anti-trans etc) in recent years. Hates Joe Biden and Kamal Harris but can't or won't say why. Thanks for the responses so far and I'll try to respond, but I'm about to start work shortly.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

However she has become more racist and judgemental (anti-trans etc) in recent years. Hates Joe Biden and Kamal Harris but can't or won't say why.

I’m gonna guess that it’s because she watches Fox “News”, and that she can’t say why she hates Biden and Harris. She’s simply heard so much anti-Democrat rhetoric that she’s parroting it.

Ethically, the choice seems easy. While specific events may be unpredictable, the themes of hatred and authoritarianism were obvious to anyone who was genuinely paying attention during the campaign. They knowingly voted for a complete piece of shit. They voted for someone who had tried to overthrow the government when things didn’t go his way. He had already been convicted of bribery and sexual assault before the election even took place. The man is simply unfit for office.

Your level of resentment is by no means “locked in”. You have every right to be angry.

The best thing you can do is communicate. Talk with your wife. Show her your post. Don’t keep your resentment bottled up - that’s not healthy. Hopefully, the two of you can come to a solution that doesn’t harm your marriage. If her family doesn’t like it, too bad. Through their (deliberate?) ignorance, they helped create this problem in the first place.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Excellent reponse, and sounds a lot like one side of my internal debate. On the one hand, since we moved away the only family she's got left are welded-on republicans. But on the other, she's been around for the last decade, and not knowing what she was voting for has to include some portion of wilfull ignorance. My wife knows how I feel, because she feels the same. She's just very conflicted because she's always been incredibly close with her mother, and severing family ties isn't something she would ever consider possible. I intend to spend a lot of time in my home office during the next visit, and my wife knows that now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am of the opinion that not discussing these things is an analog to the Paradox of Tolerance, if not being exactly what the Paradox is about. If we don't discuss the hatefulness, then the hateful think they are doing fine.

Attacking only causes people to "dig in". Passive aggressive actions will make you look weak.

Being cordial while also calling out instances of hate as they occur would likely be fine. Be strong and confident, but keep corrections short and to the point (Imagine correctly a 5 year old. Understanding and care, not anger, and keep things in reality.) "That didn't happen.", "Why would a criminal say that?", "Toddlers visiting basketball plays, will reduce the average height, but no one gets shorter or taller."

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

That's how I intend to approach it, during the times when I'm unable to just not be around her.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

fill your house with tons of progressive decorations. Lots of lgbt+ and such and a painting of biden above the mantel. really do it up. then have her visit as much as she likes.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Progressive talk radio on in the background at all times?

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago

Progressive talk radio does exist and came be pretty good.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I LOVE this idea. I'm doing it! I think a trans pride flag would look great on my back porch!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago

Disapproval continues to be appropriate until they repent. Resentfulness harms only yourself, and should be avoided if possible. Overall I think you're walking the line pretty well so far.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do they try to talk politics while around? If so I'd fucking unload on their sorry asses (depending on how the wife would react). One of the most common themes I've seen among supporters is they have a very small single issue they claim as the sole reason. So forcing them to address the full ramifications I feel is prudent.

If they don't try to talk politics, I'm not sure what I would do. But I'd definitely be making sure my wife wasn't enduring some extra trauma for the sake of family. You could try helping her realize she had the power to cut them out of her life and she can be just fine.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah she's one of those "for the economy" types. But I don't believe it from anyone who voted trump. We all saw the entirety of his first term, and J6. On top of that, in my opinion anyone who says they voted for him for the economy is tacitly admitting they knew he was going to hurt people, but chose to ignore that because they thought it would benefit them personally.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't really offer specific advice on this situation. I don't know. But I will say, in general separating from the person who's victimized by propaganda just helps the propaganda spread. A lot of this stuff actually has deliberate features and habits that it tries to instill into people, to make it drive away people who might talk sense into them and make it harder for them to hear sense if someone does say it to them.

I think you should view your MIL as a victim of propaganda, similar to a drug addict or a person with significant trauma in their life. A lot of them are victims. Of course, if she's telling you "I'm glad they're snatching all those US citizens and deporting them to hellish nightmare prisons in other countries just because they're Hispanic," then maybe you want to shun her. But usually what's happened is that they've gotten so twisted up in their perceptions that they think that what they're saying and supporting is something really good, and everyone should support it. The stuff that she is victimized by is incredibly powerful, it's not surprising to me that a lot of people get taken in by it.

Like I say it's hard to give general advice about what you should do. But this may help you to be more gentle with her even if you are aware of the hatefulness at work in the stuff she was victimized by and have some understandably big feelings about it.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is the ultimate high road I think, something to aspire to, if I can get my internal rage under control! It's somewhat futile though, I've lost count of how many times she's said "We never made more money than we did under Reagan" and then I've tried to explain to her that all that money she made was US debt that still hasn't been repaid. But I think this reponse is ethical, pragmatic, and sympathetic.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah. It sounds cliche, but "listen with your heart" is really accurate. She's saying she misses the old days when America worked. That's not wrong (I mean for white people it's not, I would recommend not to go down that rabbit hole lol). A lot of it isn't about what you say to her, it's how you say it. If everything you say sounds cold and factual and correcting her, of course she's not going to want to listen and it's just going to be a hostile interaction.

It is tough. My experience with stuff like this is that they just live in a whole different reality, so it is hard to get a foothold. I had to work really hard at having conversations with people for whom the tone of voice and emotional intent is a huge part of how they process the information (which I think is most people). That's not how I operate, so it was hard to keep it in mind without coming off as fake or condescending, but if you're genuine about what you mean and focus on sort of the core of why you came to your beliefs (not the facts but the reasons why you care about the facts so much), a lot of times it comes across better. And then on top of that, you're dealing with someone where their factual understanding of the world is off in la-la land, so it's hard to not just lecture them or tell them what's what.

Like that kind of thing about Reagan, my first reaction to the answer is "Yeah, and have you wondered why that hasn't ever happened since then? Why everyone was doing okay until the late 80s and then it all went to hell and hasn't come back? Honestly that's what I want, is to get back to when working people had a fair shake and people could make a living. Don't you want that? It sure as hell is not happening now under Trump..."

But again, it's not the words, it's the intent behind them. If you're reasonable and you care, then it's hard for her to take your statements hostile even if she doesn't agree with them (honestly I can guarantee you that one conversation or even several about it will not change her mind.) But you can sort of plant seeds and then she'll come around on her own, or if she does not then oh well.

If she is being overtly hateful on her own then it's different. IDK what you can even do then. But mostly in my experience it is people who are so twisted up that they think the Democrats are so hateful that of course things X, Y, and Z make perfect sense and are the only humane thing to do. Mostly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To your edit... it rather sounds like she is in fact MAGA and doesn't want to admit to the "why". there's really not very many people who were both willing to vote for trump a second time and aren't MAGA, even if they don't want to admit it.

from an ethics stand point, I'll remind you of an old german saying. "If 10 men are sitting at a table with a nazi, you have 11 nazis." You cannot look at trump and honestly conclude he's an acceptable (never mind good,) president without also agreeing with his fascist and tyrannical bullshit. if she's genuinely unhappy with the status quo, she can show it by protesting or something. Until then, she's still a trump supporter and still part of the problem, and there is zero excuse for not knowing what he was about. he said he was going to do everything that he's doing. (well. maybe not the ballroom or shitting himself, but details.)

but none of us are the ones you need to be having this conversation with. we can't decide what's right here... that's a personal decision you need to make with your wife.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago

Pretty much hit the nail on the head there boss. No matter how hard I try I can't accept the ignorance excuse after what all of us have seen. Earlier this year I said to my mother in law "surely you knew at the time that you were doing the wrong thing?" She denied it. The best approach for me is to be around the MIL as little as possible. My wife knows that. It makes her sad, but she understands.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Put a rainbow flag in the room where she sleeps. 😋
Maybe a picture of Reagan with quotes of how Russia is the enemy, and tariffs are bad for everybody.

a picture of Reagan with quotes of how Russia is the enemy, and tariffs are bad for everybody.

That's particularly good.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

She does love Reagan... 😆

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don’t think it’s unreasonable to want to avoid your MIL. I also think it’s reasonable for your wife to maintain the relationship.

Can you use her visit as excuse to take a vacation—alone or with friends—or visit your family? Given the circumstances, I think avoidance is a perfectly valid option. Get some you time if your wife is cool with it.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

I'm definitely planning to not be around the MIL much. I have a home office to hide in. I've briefly considered taking a weekend camping here or there, but that would hurt my wife as camping has always been an us thing. But when I say she stays for an extended period, I'm talking multiple months in a normal year. Guess I'll just install some computer games! 😉

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

This is by far the most reasonable compromise I’ve seen. OP, if the MIL absolutely must visit, this is a completely fair thing to demand in exchange. You are making a sacrifice for the sake of your wife. If you’re willing to be flexible, she should be, too.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

These people are guilty of crimes against humanity many times over. Crimes against the American people, war crimes, treasonous acts against the constitution...you name it.

You shouldn't feel obliged to entertain people who support that. Zero consequences for these people means zero reconciliation for their atrocious behavior.

In the wise words of Christopher Walken:

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

This is where I'm at. I have a hard time scrounging up any kindness or forgiveness. I also have a hard time accepting the ignorance excuse when we've all seen the last 10 years of trump.

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is not an ethics question; it's an emotions question. You are angry, becoming angrier, and hold her in part responsible for the reasons you are angry. What you do about it could become an ethics question if you engage in something extreme, but otherwise - who cares? Think about how actions might affect your relationship with your wife then choose what you want to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Do they show any kind of remorse, like "I didn't think it would be that bad", denial "I don't believe [bad thing] actually happened", or are they straight-up going "serves them right, fuck them kids"? If it's the third option, I wouldn't even let them into my house anymore.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Kind of in the middle, ignore it and it doesn't exist. If she was full maga then definitely not allowed in the house. My wife's 2 sisters are and I've made it clear they shouldn't bother coming to our city expecting to be invited into our home.

[–] Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Usually I'd think that a person's political opinions /choices are their own and they're entitled to it and we shouldn't allow it to divide us but your country is fucked. What's been happening and the atrocities played upon the people in your country is beyond fucked and appalling. Unless she is able to see this and regrets her decision, I believe she is still responsible and complicit to what is happening.

This is a real extreme circumstance what is happening in your country and my comment is really on the exception here. Those who voted Trump and still don't regret it are fucked in the head somewhere.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Besides voting for Trump, is there anything else problematic with her behavior? Because, you know, everyone can make a mistake, and being a family is about doing your best to accept people regardless of their flaws.

You say she’s not MAGA, so is it her forcing you into unwanted political conversations or is it the other way around? Because if it’s you who’s constantly pressuring her on his this issue, it kinda isn’t fair for you to complain about it.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's neither, she prefers to not address it at all. I don't, but I think that's too close to giving her a pass. I've already left the handling of her family to my wife, they all know where I stand. I was more curious about the ethics, from a purely academic standpoint, of me continuing to get angrier at these people over the consequences of a choice they made almost a year ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would make myself scarce and hard to find

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I should preface everything I'm about to say by saying there is probably a reason you are married and I am not, and that my response is probably wrong.

I lived a somewhat similar experience during his first presidency and COVID. Personally, I would have the most issues with my partner. By ignoring the abhorrent behavior and decisions of their family and choosing to interact with them anyway, they are condoning what their family is doing. Even if they are somewhat vocal in their disagreement, the family is avoiding the consequences of their actions since the spouse is still giving them what they want.

If my spouse shut them down and called them on all of their bull shit, I'd probably be OK with them continuing the relationship, but most people aren't willing to do that.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your wife made the decision for you collectively not break off the relationships all together. I understand that you don't like it. The adage that blood is thicker than water applies here on top of any other concern. And that's why I would tread carefully in the interest of your marriage. Another folk wisdom is that morals are something you need to be able to afford. And my guess is you will not be able to do so here in the way you would prefer. While her family is at your house, you mustn't tolerate any bullshit and you should be free to express your dismay at the protofascist state of affairs. But I would keep it at a non-shouting, non-hostile level. Your wife has spent your morals money. Try to look at it as an opportunity to change minds. If they are at your house they cannot run away, you have a semi-captive audience, in which you can sow the seeds of doubt. If there is to be another election, this is better than a clean cut, breaking off contact, and entrenching opinions out of spite on their side. Grit your teeth and roll up that rock, Sisyphus. Calm arguments and facts, tackle the ball not the player. And find a way to channel your frustration elsewhere (punching bag in the garage, walk the dog, friendly ear that maybe isn't your wife's, etc.).

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Grit your teeth and roll up that rock, Sisyphus. Calm arguments and facts, tackle the ball not the player

Uggggh! That's haaaaard!!! But solid advice.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You don't have to agree with your family's politics. It's basically guaranteed a huge chunk will disagree with you on something. Just don't talk about politics with them since it upsets you so much.

It's perfectly reasonable to steer the conversation away from politics if it comes up, and if they insist, particularly at your house, be a bit more direct about not having political discussions over the dinner table.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is like telling someone living in Germany in 1932 to just chill and steer the conversation away from Hitler if it comes up.

[–] Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which they probably did to keep themselves and their families save, so that wasn't that good of a comparison tbh.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 week ago

Depends on how much you value your wife.

[–] Jaybird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's your and your wife's home. So your rules apply. Make that agreement with your wife beforehand. So there are no fights afterwards.

Things like;

  1. She must not address you. Basically act as if the other person does not exist.
  2. The visit will be as short as reasonably possible. For longer bouts with her daughter, your wife can visit her mother.
  3. She must be humble and accept the extreme difference in views.
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

She must not address you. Basically act as if the other person does not exist.

The MIL has already offered to not engage in politics, take her up on the offer. Batting away the olive branch just comes off as childish.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not what olive branch means.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then explain it.

What do you think "olive branch” means in this situation?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›