this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
51 points (100.0% liked)

news

221 readers
728 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

He always does nuclear posturing when he's out of ideas.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago

Usually, when someone has developed an amazing new weapon that no-one else has, you don't get all dressed up and go on TV to tell the world all about it.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Oh, shit, is that camo!? This guy must be the ultimate fucking badass. Literally zero chance he's an adorable little cancer-stricken Keebler elf. I mean, goddamn! Camo! Shit, son!

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What are ypu talking about? It's just a picture of an empty chair.

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Wow! Is the chair invincible too? Is the invincible in the room with us?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

and a very long table.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

his face bloated from corticosteroids a while back.

[–] obelix@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

It must be serious, he put his special little windcheater on for the announcement.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

“The Skyfall is a uniquely stupid weapon system, a flying Chernobyl that poses more threat to Russia than it does to other countries," agreed Thomas Countryman, a former top State Department official with the Arms Control Association, referring to the 1986 nuclear plant disaster.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh what a coincidence, I just concluded tests for the teleportation bomb! It's an explosive that's totally untraceable and teleports to it's target, so it's a 100% completely guaranteed anonymous strike on your target.

Source: trust me bro

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

You are hereby offered an NCD-grant to develop this into a meme

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

I teleported into your mom last night.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

"Boooo, get new material!"

[–] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And nobody has detected it? Russel's missile, I suppose.

I’ve got a missile so undetectable even I can’t find it — and don’t ask for proof.

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"The 9M730 Burevestnik (Russian: Буревестник; "Storm petrel", NATO reporting name: SSC-X-9 Skyfall) is a Russian low-flying, nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed cruise missile under development for the Russian Armed Forces. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, the missile's range is effectively unlimited."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9M730_Burevestnik

Also from that article: Director of the Federation of American Scientists's Nuclear Information Project Hans M. Kristensen points out that the Burevestnik will be as vulnerable as any cruise missile, and questions the motive behind it, since the longer it flies the more time there is to track it.

Former Los Alamos National Laboratory nuclear researcher Cheryl Rofer and former top State Department official with the Arms Control Association Thomas Countryman have both pointed out the risk of nuclear contamination to Russia itself, with Countryman calling the weapon system "uniquely stupid" and calling it a "flying Chernobyl".

[–] notabot@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Didn't the US come up with the idea of a nuclear powered ramjet missile back around the cold war? I seem to recall the idea was that it'd massively contaminate everything it flew over before crashing and exploding. It would be able to fly for many hours or days and shooting it down just meant a load of radioactive scrap landed on your head. I think it too was deemed "uniquely stupid" and shelved, but it sounds like the Russians have resurected the idea.

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The Russian way: Impractical, self-harming, unreliable, half-assed. 10% research, 20% development, 20% hype, 50% damage control and saving face.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, the nuclear torpedo was too.

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yep, the USA build a bunch of them and ran several tests, so they are very qualified to know how bad an idea this is. Radioactive pollution in the air + the risk of an active nuclear reactor falling from the sky. Supposedly some Russians have already died in 2019 when recovering a missile that crashed in 2017.

A much more in depth article than the wiki article, but with more speculation: https://basicint.org/brief-burevestnik/

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 1 points 1 week ago

Didn’t North Korea recently have a parade with another comically large “weapon” that would only fool extremely stupid people?

This seems familiar, is all.

It’s sad that the world’s leaders are pathetic little boys.

[–] lol_idk@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean aren't all nukes kind of invincible?

[–] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Modern nuclear weapons carry multiple warheads per missile launched, each individually controlled. You can strike a dozen different cities in one launch.

They have 3 phases: Launch, coast, re-entry. You can intercept them successfully in the first two.

Once the warheads have been jettisoned from the missile it's really hard to get them in the re-entry phase, they're really small and come in at Mach 10 and there's dozens of them.

The US has a system that can supposedly intercept a few but it's not gonna be nearly enough to make any meaningful difference.

The only way to "win" a nuclear war is to first know exactly where absolutely every single one of your enemy's nukes are and then striking all of the launch sites first without your massive preparation to do so being detected.

[–] gressen@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're quoting details about ballistic missiles but this news in about w cruice missile - totally different thing.

[–] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Those are the "invincible" ones the person above me has in their mind.

This new missile is a cruise missile indeed, which can be intercepted with most anti aircraft solutions

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

These are the hypersonic missles that are still tearing themselves apart?

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

the hypersonic "missles" the US losers with all the money they piss away on war can't make