this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
248 points (98.1% liked)

News

33010 readers
2931 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The memo also appears to contradict the department’s shutdown plan released in late September, when it referred to the contingency fund as part of its SNAP plan.

“Congressional intent is evident that SNAP’s operations should continue since the program has been provided with multi-year contingency funds that can be used for State Administrative Expenses to ensure that the State can also continue operations during a Federal Government shutdown,” the shutdown plan said. “These multi-year contingency funds are also available to fund participant benefits in the event that a lapse occurs in the middle of the fiscal year.”

The Agriculture Department said Friday it can’t use a special reserve fund to pay food stamp benefits during the partial government shutdown because the money is meant to be used when appropriations fall short, not when the funding doesn’t exist.

I'd argue the source below is higher quality but got moderated for being substack:

https://mander.xyz/post/40669009/22934422

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So glad there is money to tackle and disappear brown people, but not money to feed people.

[–] henfredemars 21 points 1 week ago

We have plenty of money to feed everyone. Those just aren't the right kind of American these days.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

Remember that they're splitting hairs to starve poor people here, but illegally raiding R&D money to pay the military

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Republicans really want food riots.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Their goal is anything violent to trigger the insurrection act. That’s part of why they were so pissed off that No Kings was peaceful. So now they’re going for the food.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're gonna get it, in a serious way. I don't think there's enough troops to take on this many pissed people living in cities and such.

Most substation power transformers take years to replace, and are only protected by chain link fences.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that's because the fence is there to protect you, not the transformer.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bit of armor piercing isn't going to do the oil-filled housing much good..

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But why would the gov care if you are without power? The ones they need will be well protected.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not saying it's logical. Individuals are smart, people are blah blah blah..

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well I am saying it won't deter the gov in anyway.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At some point, if enough of the grid were damaged, the remaining bits would get overloaded.

Soldiers in unlit urban corridors should be expected to do worse in their mission, nevermind all the added chaos.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They will just use generators. I mean seriously, the military can deploy to places like Afghanistan and iraq, where I am sure they had no power until they took over the power facilities and such. They can handle power without a grid just fine.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Supply lines, drones, and how difficult powering entire city blocks off generators is..

Let's end this discussion with a simple point: several hundred dollars for a gun and AP rounds means the military is suddenly responsible for partially powering a surrounding area, with their "enemies" (we the people) made dramatically harder to see at night.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Your simple point isn't the mic drop you think it is. You seem to think this administration would care about maintaining order in every city block through the night. They would create green zones for themselves with power and such, but the rest would be on thier own each night, and probably only minorly managed during the day even. Workers and whoever they need would have to go through security to get into the green zones to work for food. This playbook has already been written and perfected over centuries.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No mic drop was attempted. Armchair debates about how things would work out are similarly pointless.

I will agree that historical data is not always an accurate predictor of future events. But in this case we are talking not about what will happen, but about would the administration's future actions be influenced by the possibility of people attacking transformers. It is reasonable to say that in the past, similar administration's didn't worry about similar things, so it is unlikely that the current administration will either.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago

The government is doing a lot of things it "can't" do. This is one of those times I would say "do it anyway, and worry about the consequences later", because it's objectively a net help for people.

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I originally used this source and I think its higher quality (but substack so got moderated):

https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/october-25-2025

Yesterday the Trump administration said it would not use any of the approximately $6 billion the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) holds in reserve to fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

the shutdown plan the USDA released in late September. Then, it said: “Congressional intent is evident that SNAP’s operations should continue since the program has been provided with multi-year contingency funds that can be used for State Administrative Expenses to ensure that the State can also continue operations during a Federal Government shutdown. These multi-year contingency funds are also available to fund participant benefits in the event that a lapse occurs in the middle of the fiscal year.”

Today, in yet another violation of the Hatch Act that prohibits the use of government resources for partisan ends, the USDA Food and Nutrition Service website reads: “Senate Democrats have now voted 12 times to not fund the food stamp program, also known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Bottom line, the well has run dry. At this time, there will be no benefits issued November 01. We are approaching an inflection point for Senate Democrats. They can continue to hold out for healthcare for illegal aliens and gender mutilation procedures or reopen the government so mothers, babies, and the most vulnerable among us can receive critical nutrition assistance.”

at the same time the Department of Agriculture says it cannot spend its $6 billion in reserves to address the $8 billion needed for SNAP in November, the administration easily found $20 billion to prop up right-wing Trump ally Javier Milei in Argentina.

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They'll shuffle money to pay their fucking military though. Bootlicking twats.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Starve the poors, extra salt on the wound for farmers

Whatever makes things worse