this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
159 points (97.0% liked)

politics

26252 readers
3131 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Before anyone says that the truck should not have been doing that, ask yourself… Could ICE have just backed up and waited for something to happen that could justify opening fire?

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

October 23, 1983, two truck bombs killed 307, US/French servicemembers and civilians in Beirut.

Also was Coast Guard who opened fire, not ICE.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You could say that about anything.

"we had to shoot the minivan because in Iraq these have had bombs in them."

"we had to shoot that kid, because he may have had a bomb in his backpack."

"sure, that lady just had to die. She may have had a gun. Who could have known it was just a remote control?"

The reality is that the people shooting are helping kidnappers, Nazi's, and generally evil people. Of course they aren't going to show patience or civility towards civilians. That's not why the president has injected them into that situation.

They are military, and they are there to wage war on Americans.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Except it's the gate of the military base and there are procedures with dealing with these things. I get it. I don't think you should just shoot anything, but there is a line. This was the entry to the base, to the bridge that gets you on the base. The bridge itself is sensitive, and obviously the base is. This wasn't like cops unloading on a dude trying to get away because he's got warrants out. I just feel like the potential for negative results was much higher.

And these were CG security, if my understanding is correct. This wasn't Trump's hit squad, these were the dudes who have been guarding the entry point to the base for as long as the base has been there. It's literally their job, guard the entry.

I appreciate all your hypotheticals, but this real life situation is someone attempting to force entry onto a US military installation. That's the real situation, and this is how that sort of behavior is dealt with across the globe.

I'm mad about ICE too, I'm just not sure what they have to do with this situation, other than the protest being nearby. I'm not sure how the base security are helping kidnappers and being Nazis, unless your beef is with the military. Shit, I'll even say it's okay to have some beef against the military and how they've been used, but the Coast Guard? I can't think of any reason to hate on the Coast Guard.

[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can find lots of stuff that hasn’t happened in the United States

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

And some might have even been in the past 40 years.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It happened to a US military base in a foreign nation, which, for all intents and purposes, is US soil. This truck was backing it's way onto a US base, refused to comply with orders. It got EOF'd. I appreciate everyone wanting to hate ICE, I think they're a bunch of bitches, but unless someone's has some legit proof this is some sort of false flag or anything, this is pretty SOP.

[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 week ago

If bitches is the most extreme you think they are, it doesn’t surprise me you’re simping for them

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It’s possible they thought the truck was full of explosives, and was trying to blow up the bridge to the Coast Guard island.

[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sure, still not an excuse.

“It’s possible that black man had a gun in his pocket so I just decided to shoot him”

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Congratulations, you passed. Here is your badge, gun, mask.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The driver was approaching them kinda aggressively and weirdly in a place where no cars should be at that time.

If you want to make an analogy it’s like a guy approaching the cops while threateningly waving a weapon.

[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

It's also possible they thought the truck was full of robot centipedes.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What do we learn from this? This kind of U-Haul truck is a viable armored vehicle for reversing into a line of gunfire because this dude didnt even get hit at all after like 30 rounds were fired at the car.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think another source reported he was shot in the stomach. And I saw a video of the truck after it was found—there were many bullet holes through the cab.

Edit: A later report clarifies that it was the bystander who was shot in the stomach, while the driver had a more minor injury.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The photographer reportedly went and inspected the vehicle after it returned, where he saw bullet holes but no traces of blood.

I didnt look at other articles so i just assumed this was correct. Maybe he got out before the blood reached the seat.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Really, just pile up a layer of sandbags or whatever against the back door and you would be quite good to go.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So would that work? Sandbag armored vehicle sounds pretty heavy

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bullets dont do very well in a fight vs solid objects, the more solid the worse they perform

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's a guy on the tube that shoots at a 6" square box of sand It stops almost everything...

[–] SillyDude@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It's already a truck.

Sandbags are remarkably effective at stopping small arms fire, at least as long as you can keep the sand in them. If you only stacked up the back wall of the truck right in front of the door and optionally if you only did it to waist height (you'd have to lie down behind them) it would absolutely work.

A typical hardware store sandbag is 60 or 80 pounds, and to stack up to a height of, say, four feet you'd probably need around 3200 pounds worth of them or so (40 bags) based on some rough back of the envelope math and hazy recollection of the approximate size of an 80 lb bag of sand. That may exceed the recommended load weight of your small box truck per the rental agreement paperwork or whatever the hell, but I don't think in reality that would cause even a small U-Haul truck to struggle much.

Doing all four walls of the rear of the truck would probably take an inordinate amount of sand and wouldn't be too viable.

Didn't mythbusters prove phone books were effective armor?

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Watch the whole video, bullets made it all the way through.

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

This entire thing is so weird. If I would be a mouth breathing ICE agent, I would have put Charlie Kirk’s carcass in this U haul, provoked someone into shooting it and waited until the orange idiot declared California a antifa terror state.

And all this wouldn’t even be the dumbest thing you heard all week.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

This will only get worse. Trump wants violence, and this entire country will descend into violence eventually if the GOP voters don't wake the fuck up and join us in trying to stop it.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Fuck ICE and all, but.... Why would you back a uhaul up toward a line of squad cars like that? What a supremely stupid thing to do.

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

ICE was driving the truck. Creating this headline is the purpose.

[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Perhaps they did not think that their government would open fire on them.

[–] 0ndead 6 points 1 week ago

This action made no sense. And dude just drove a block forward, parked and walked away. Sus as fuck.

[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe he has to be out of his flat ASAP.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 week ago

No, Nazis and ice favor u haul and other nondescript rentals.