this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
627 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26257 readers
3030 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democrats have only hardened their position as the government shutdown enters its 23rd day, leaving Republican majorities in Congress with few answers — and many criticisms.

For the 12th time, Senate Democrats blocked the Republican Party's government funding legislation this week without a single senator switching his or her vote.

Just three Democratic caucus members voted for the bill: John Fetterman, D-Pa.; Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev.; and Angus King, I-Maine. That means Republicans are still five votes short of the 60-vote threshold to ensure passage of the bill, just as they have been since before the government shut down 23 days ago.

Democratic voters had pressured their party to take a more confrontational posture toward Trump in the shutdown battle. The new stance may be paying off with the party’s base.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I'm sorry, but the rules for how your government works are so confusing.

And requiring budget bills to pass every year or you entire government shuts down is a bug most other democracies patched out last century. (You just make everything roll over by default if you can't pass a budget). The US Government seems to be constantly in shut down. It's kinda dumb folks, it doesn't need to be this way.

I could have sworn I heard that the 100 person US senate only needs 51 members to pass a bill, but I vaguely heard they don't want to do that because it overrides the option to filibuster?

What???

Very lost over here

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 202 points 1 week ago

If we don't hold the line now, everything gets much worse.

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 196 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There is no negotiating to be had on the issue. Remove the cuts to healthcare or fuck off.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Sadly, most Americans have very short attention spans and will soon forget what the shutdown was about and will be more concerned with a short term crisis than long term health care worries. My worry is the Republicans know this, after all they manufactured this nation's eroded attention span and used it to gain power already.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 51 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The last shutdown ended after 35 days when LaGuardia was shutdown due to protests ftom airport workers who weren't getting payed.

My prediction is a similar thing will happen.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are about to miss a full paycheck this weekend, and it's the end of the month, bills are about due. Things are about to start hurting.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

If only we had an extra 40 billion...

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Man. It would royally suck if some government flights stayed grounded because air traffic control refused to work. 😐

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

That's a messaging shortcoming, not the public's fault. If I have short attention span it is mostly because shit is stacking faster than I can cope.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While being manipulated is not your fault as a member of the public, it is certainly the public's fault for not being informed or taking the time to learn about and understand politics and allowing the kind of "why you gotta make everything political" anti-engagement sentiment to influence you.

Somewhere along the way we started allowing someone's poor understanding of how the world works and how the country operates to be a respectable and protected identity, rather than a sign of massive failure from top to bottom of the system.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's actually worse. With the pocket recision that has already been used, the administration has literally demonstrated that they will rescind any deal they don't want to pay for. Frankly, the only way to negotiate in good faith would be some legal measure passed and tested by the courts (because the pocket recision used to be illegal until this SCOTUS ruled in favor of it, like just in time for this budget needing to be passed), guaranteeing that the administration will fund what Congress has appropriated funds for.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 110 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago

He's just appeasing the Nazis. It worked back in WW2

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 102 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Just three Democratic caucus members voted for the bill: John Fetterman, D-Pa.; Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev.; and Angus King, I-Maine.

Hear that Nevada and Maine? You should probably deal with your traitors.

Everybody already knew about Fetterman

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 73 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Keep it shutdown and keep the core message that GOP can end this if they cared about health care for normal americans.

Keep up the pressure and rally around the message.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jackal 65 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I was just telling my best friend that I think this shutdown is going to go on for six to eight months. Possibly to the point where the pot boils over and the government gets thrown away because it was closed for so long.

At least, one can dream that after months of bitter pain and suffering, we might possibly get people who care about others running a government. But that’s a whole hell of a serving of pain and suffering before we get there.

Fuck it, let’s general strike this place. Medicare for all with the govt reopen and all those critical services back or nothing ever happens again.

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (7 children)

the government gets thrown away because it was closed for so long.

Is that a real possibility? How does that actually work? Is there a new election triggered automatically if the government was shut down for 6-8 months?

If not, you will most likely be waiting and hoping forever, all the while things just keep getting worse.

In parliamentary democracies the budget is automatically a vote of confidence. If the government can't pass it, an election occurs. Nothing shuts down because the system is still operating on the existing budget that was already passed.

[–] jackal 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is that written into laws? No. But you know who made the original government? People who decided to make their own shit.

We have more information and better access to new decisions. We can simply decide to start over collectively and start once again. We don’t have to do things because that’s the way they have always been (in our individual lifetime).

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Surely, my ideology will rise from the ashes!

These are the vibes I'm getting

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Possibly to the point where the pot boils over and the government gets thrown away because it was closed for so long.

Lovely notion, but realistically... who is going to do the "throwing away?" There's no system above our government. We don't have a deal with Britain that they'll come back if we can't manage our country. There's no real such thing as law above a nation.

Instead we have thousands of aspiring political leaders on both sides who will see ANY vacancy of power as an opportunity. They're jockeying right now like Mad Max behind the scenes, but instead of tricked out cars with spikes, it's committees, delegations and policy wonkery to get prepared for the midterms which are still a year away.

I am only saying all this because you and your friend's sentiment is common and needs to be adjusted... Nobody is coming.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

I feel like a dramatic dissolution should be a possibility considered, but I don't really expect us to come out of it with a new people-focused government. Likely if the budget never gets passed Trump decides he doesn't need Congress and just starts spending money as he wishes. He'll even start with funding something the people want, then once it's established that he can just spend money and no one will stop him, he'll move on to the instruments of oppression. When the military is directly being paid by the president, we'll see how much of their oath is really to the Constitution.

[–] Kalon@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago

From this start it seemed likely to me that they would hold out until Heath Insurance rate letters stated going out.

[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good. Hold the fucking line.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I just feel bad though now that others have to stand in a food line. But I agree.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I’m gonna have to vote for Fetterman in three years, aren’t I.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That depends on whether someone in PA can assemble the resources needed to primary him.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 49 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I honestly dont expect him to run for reelection. The guy seems to absolutely hate being a senator after having a stroke. He definitely despises being in the public eye or the center of attention to some degree. He also seems to not really have much awareness of things going on around him in general anymore. He really should not be in such a stressful position in his current state of health, and I doubt he wants to be. Pride is probably the sole thing keeping him from stepping down. It definitely isnt his love for being in the role, that is for sure

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

Pride is probably the sole thing keeping him from stepping down.

I think that sums up so many of the Democratic Party's problems.....

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He's a shitty town mayor. He got some TV time back then for his 'crazy antics'. You might be right the national spotlight is hopefully too much for him.

But you also don't need to work a real job while you're elected. That could be a bigger draw.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Oct 16 - Daily Beast

Top-ranking Democratic Party officials in Pennsylvania are gearing up to run against Sen. John Fetterman in a 2028 primary contest, according to a report.

Big names in the state who could well run against the increasingly embattled incumbent include House Representatives Brendan Boyle and Chris Deluzio, along with former Congressman Conor Lamb, Axios reports, citing multiple inside sources.

Axios added it was not clear whether Fetterman, who is understood to have ambitions of running for the White House, plans to run again for the Senate or the presidency in 2028.

Fetterman texted Axios saying, “enjoy your clickbait!” and requested “please do not contact” in response to follow-up questions. He also shared an article citing him as one of “the least Trump-aligned Democratic lawmakers in the state.”

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lmao at that last sentence..

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I got Brian Fitzpatrick as my rep, the "#1 Most Bipartisan Member of Congress" for however many years now. Still votes with Trump 51% of the time, and it's only on money things he'll break with Republicans on, very rarely ever is it a moral thing.

Meanwhile Fetterman is polling better with Republicans (around 60% favorable) compared to with the Dems (around 50% favorable).

Want to come up with a compromise on farm aid or disaster recovery? Go right ahead. Compromising on genocide and using the military on US soil? You better not reach across the aisle on that if you want my support. Fetterman deserves to be judged by the company he keeps.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We don’t negotiate with terrorists.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

We literally do, though. We negotiate all the fucking time. Reagan was negotiating with terrorists when he said that.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Goddamnit Fetterman be an actual democrat again for 5 minutes.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Why hasn't he been kicked out yet?

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Seriously. He needs to be censured and removed from the party. Make him run as an independent.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fetterman is a Democrat just like manchin is a Democrat, so basicly not a democrat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

PA has some of poorest, worst quality of life conditions I have seen in this country. They really need to boot Fetterman. Jesus, wtf?

[–] zammy95@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

....what? Are you sure you've been to Pennsylvania?

Fetterman can get fucked though, I'm with you there

[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, generalizations aren’t great. I’ve seen beautiful parts too. I have driven through and have family from small towns out in the country

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Hope they downgrade the US’s credit reputation yet again.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›