this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
592 points (98.5% liked)

politics

26257 readers
3785 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jeff Merkley of Oregon gave address to make case that president is ‘violating the law’ through authoritarianism

Oregon’s Jeff Merkley gave a marathon, nearly 23-hour speech on the Senate floor that began on Tuesday and ended late Wednesday, pressing the case that Donald Trump is acting as an authoritarian by prosecuting political enemies and deploying the military into Merkley’s home town of Portland.

The 68-year-old senator began speaking around 6.20pm on Tuesday evening and continued until just after 5pm on Wednesday. Standing continuously on the Senate floor alongside placards that read “authoritarianism is here now!” and “Trump is violating the law”, Merkley paused only to take questions from fellow Democratic senators who joined him in the chamber to make their own points about the president’s conduct.

“I’ve come to the Senate floor tonight to ring the alarm bells. We’re in the most perilous moment, the biggest threat to our republic since the civil war. President Trump is shredding our constitution,” Merkley said as he began his speech.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skooma_king@piefed.social 74 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Feel kinda dumb for not knowing already, but do they get to take a piss break during this?

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 96 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

No, Booker said he fasted for days and stopped drinking water 24 hours before his speech to not leave the floor. Strom Thurmond famously had a bucket placed close enough to keep one foot in the room while he relieved himself.

[–] skooma_king@piefed.social 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Modern day, these are all recorded right? Thinking a pee face compilation (hard to believe no diapers) would be a great addition to 2025.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Go full LBJ and just whip it out mid speech in full view. I doubt cspan would be quick to censor.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That man was insane, but sometimes I fantasize about that high pressure shower he supposedly has installed.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

LBJ was a specific style of batshit that comes from not giving an iota of a fuck about social cues and I aspire to such capabilities.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago

The article I read said that Booker, Andy Kim, and a few other Dems would occasionally ask him "extended questions" to give him a break. Dunno if he's allowed to leave the floor or not, but I imagine the "extended questions" are just them doing nonsense filibuster bullshit for a few mins

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] errer@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Assert dominance, drink all the water you want and piss yourself. Keep the floor for weeks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Without wanting to being a dick, and believing that is an astonishing achievement for a politician, especially of his age, i think that is a nice gesture,

but if the Democrats wont call people on the Streets, nothing will change. SPD did the same tactic against Nazis back in 1930s and you know the results. Ofc they cant do that because that will be as betraying the corp interests.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah, democrats need to call for a general strike.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

That's my senator! I think I would have passed out after an hour.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

68 years old and 23 hours, wow!

[–] fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

23 hours and nobody heard it.

[–] Angelevo@feddit.nl 12 points 1 week ago

Grand gesture!

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Democrats need to instruct people to take direct action against the administration and the rouge DOJ

People are sick of sitting around watching Nazis rise to power, this doesn't go anywhere until we force change

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›