this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
500 points (96.8% liked)

News

37007 readers
1858 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Sept. 11, Michigan representatives proposed an internet content ban bill unlike any of the others we've seen: This particularly far-reaching legislation would ban not only many types of online content, but also the ability to legally use any VPN.

The bill, called the Anticorruption of Public Morals Act and advanced by six Republican representatives, would ban a wide variety of adult content online, ranging from ASMR and adult manga to AI content and any depiction of transgender people. It also seeks to ban all use of VPNs, foreign or US-produced.

Main issue I have with this article, and a lot of articles on this topic, is it doesn't address the issue of youth access to porn. I think any semi-intelligent person knows this is a parenting issue, but unfortunately that cat's out of the bag, thanks to the right. "Proliferation of porn" is the '90s crime scare (that never really died) all over again. If a politician or industry expert is speaking against bills like this, their talking points have to include:

  • Privacy-respecting alternatives that promise parents that their precious babies won't be able to access that horrible dangerous porn! (I don't argue that porn can't be dangerous, but this is yet another disingenuous right-wing culture (holy) war)
  • Addressing that vagueness in the bill sets up the government as morality police (it's right there in the title of the bill, FFS), and NOBODY in a "free" country should ever want that.
  • Stop saying it can be bypassed with technology. The VPN ban in this bill is a reaction to talking points like that.
  • Recognize and call out that this has nothing to do with protecting children and everything to do with a religious minority imposing its will on the rest of the country (plenty of recent examples to pull from here).

Unfortunately this is becoming enough of "A Thing" that the left is going to have to, once again, be seen doing "something" about it. So they have to thread a needle of "protecting kids," while respecting the privacy of their parents who want their kids protected and want to look at porn, and protecting businesses that require secure communications.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Newsteinleo@midwest.social 9 points 5 months ago

The news on this has been underplaying how bad this bill is. It requires ISPs to inspect traffic to ensure its no porn, meaning they would have to be able to decrypt the traffic. This makes a single point were hackers can access credit card data, personal information, and anything else you don't want to share with the world. This assumes the ISPs are willing to front the compute cost of decrypting then re-encrypting and not just banning encrypted traffic because its the easy and cheap way.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Can't do business or government without VPNs nowadays.

[–] ozzy@olio.cafe 7 points 5 months ago (13 children)

Republicans should attach their version of the bible to their version of the First Amendment. Make it official.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm really shocked there isn't a push to go back to Latin Bibles.

When they started translating the Vatican was scared it would lead to commoners being able to not just read/write, but they'd actually be able to see what the Bible said instead of just taking the priest's word on it.

Most Christians don't read the Bible by choice, but that's still different from being literally unable to read it.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 months ago

It’s the GOP/Christians. It won’t work at first but they’ll come back and make it work once they get the Supreme Court to agree.

It’s happened like this multiple times. This don’t be different.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Come to think of it I was wondering how Elon Musk would go about turning Starlink, his massive international ISP, into a tool for oppression. Get the government to outlaw all the ways for its customers to shield themselves from its data collection, I guess.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Have you seen the articles about Starlink sending down signals on frequencies that are meant for sending data up to satellites? They’re coming from his satellites that are Starshield.

My conspiracy theory is that he’s using it to disrupt data from other nearby satellites as subterfuge.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 7 points 5 months ago

"Corruption of public morals" is such a shameless name to put on a bill that simply tries to enforce your own morals.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Don't forget to ban renting servers, vps and cloud services by individuals.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

no. children get shot and killed at school on a monthly basis here and all the government can think to do is age-gate porn

[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 months ago

Teenagers watching porn is not a big deal. Kids are not property to be molded and shaped into what people want them to be, not that it would ever work. They are human beings and have a right to access information and be thenselves. It's just stupid but what do you expect from the Republicans? Maybe this will finally convince the people in that state to stop supporting these moralizing politicians who try to pretend to care about morals when they are extremely corrupt and immoral in reality, and are just trying to distract people from their constant assault in privacy, the constitution and human rights.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 months ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›