Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
That won't solve the borrow, die, repeat. It's a great idea and should definitely have been implemented yesterday to modify the incentives of middle management but we REALLY need to start taxing people on a "personal GDP" after a certain level.
Space Kare pays proportionally 1\10 of the taxes I pay without having a "wage".
"Oh, you want to buy twitter for 50b, here's your M&A property tax of 25%"
We need maximum wealth, maximum power and maximum influence laws, enforcement and strict punishments for corruption.
need it to cover all compensation but I agree. ben an jerrys had single digit multiples for the highest paid. don't see why we can't do 100.
Money is simply the ability to command labor-power. Money is an abstraction for what is in actuality class society, Financial reform around money and taxes cannot change the nature of class society. They are obfuscations designed to distract you.
Let’s make it 5 times minimum wage.
That's like $70k a year as a cap. There are jobs that are critical to the function of society but are remarkably dangerous or require unique skills that many cannot obtain. Suggesting there shouldn't be greater compensation than what a truck driver makes means no one will be willing to do these necessary yet hazardous jobs. Why would anyone weld underwater if there are other jobs that will pay just as well that aren't like.y to kill you!
I agree with the sentiment, but it's worth noting that the current excesses of CEO compensation through stock incentives are a response to a poorly implemented attempt to curb high CEO salaries.
We do need to reign in CEO compensation, but directly going after wages made the problem worse. I don't see the article addressing this, but a Clinton-era policy aimed to curb excessive CEO wages. IIRC the ratio of CEO pay to lowest paid worker within the same company was as bad as 30:1 at the time, but has since ballooned to hundreds: 1.
Maybe something as simple as capping stock incentives at N% of total compensation could work. But we'd need to make sure we're not just encouraging a new way to skirt around the legislation like last time.
If we broke up all their massive companies, they could not get such compensation. But they decided not to use the antitrust laws that already exist or say no to literally any merger.
So:
A loan of $1 m is given to Mr. Richbitch McDouchebag based on owning $1 m worth of stock.
Eventually that loan has to be paid off.
When McDouchebag sells off some stock to pay the loan, the amount paid presumably enters a bank account, either in their name or in the name of a numbered company they control, yes?
That's income. Apply tax to it before they pay off the loan. In Canada, the top marginal tax rate is 33%, so $330k minus the other marginal tax amounts for the lower brackets would be applied before this money can go to pay off a portion of that $1 million loaned.
It's either this, or we rip up the income tax act alongside finding a different revenue stream for the government.
I'm for whatever we can get on board with most people, because I am pretty sure most of us who aren't accountants hate filing income taxes.
If we instead got most of our money from other things that the government sold, then (a) big companies couldn't use the same accounting tricks to hide income, as we would no longer be taxing those precious profits of theirs (b) the rest of us wouldn't have to go through tax pain every April.
I realize that for some people, they get things like tax credits for a bunch of things like home renos, etc.
Perhaps under a no income tax system, the incentive to do these activities that reduced their income tax would have to be changed to something more tangible, like a guaranteed lower rate on utilities or something. I dunno.
I'm sorry, either I'm dense or your explanation is confusing. How is what you described different from the capital gains tax?
I completely agree with the concept of taxing income above a certain limit entirely. I think that only solves a portion of the problem, with the majority of the problem being solved by well implemented wealth taxes. Every dollar of wealth over something like 50 million USD should be taxed at 100%. No one should ever become a hundred millionaire again, let alone a billionaire.