this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
153 points (83.1% liked)

World News

50678 readers
2529 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This show of force, welcomed by some Palestinians after months of lawlessness, could now threaten the fragile ceasefire, especially as all living hostages from Hamas’s 7 October 2023 attack have been released.

The Hamas-run police maintained a high degree of public security after the militants seized power in Gaza 18 years ago while also cracking down on dissent. They largely melted away in recent months as Israeli forces seized large areas of Gaza and targeted Hamas security forces with airstrikes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 101 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Ignoring that the IDF killed 6 people yesterday during this "ceasefire" -_-

Jesus christ why can't Hamas and the Zionist party just trade for each others leaderships so they can be executed and we can move past these old fucking religious extremists who keep us busy killing each other?

FFS I hate what religion enables us to do to each other.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

it’s not religion. it’s class.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

religion is used as lubricant in the class machinery

[–] SculptusPoe@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It has nothing at all to do with religion, not even a little. Without religion, they find a different excuse to do exactly the same thing with no change.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Dude take a break from the Marxist revolution to recognize there is more than one dynamic in the world.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

I'm sorry, dude, but this is cope from the religiously indoctrinated.

Right-wing ideologies and religious participation are intrinsically linked.

[–] Natanael 3 points 3 weeks ago

There's entire factions like Randians who disagree with furious intensity

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Hamas said it would disarm once the occupation end. They accept the two state solution based on pre 67 borders. There is all kind of militant in Palestine there is not only muslims fighting the occupation. From thr palestinian side it was never about religion but liberation from settler colonialism

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you really, truly believe most Israelis don't want exactly this? The vast majority of Israelis identify as Zionists, and specifically the kinds of Zionists that would at best support expelling Palestinians.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, the propaganda is pretty strong, and it seems they've insulted their people from reason.

[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 45 points 3 weeks ago

Powerful local families and armed gangs – including some anti-Hamas factions backed by Israel – stepped into the void. Many are accused of hijacking humanitarian aid and selling it for profit, contributing to Gaza’s starvation crisis.

Nahed Sheheiber, head of Gaza’s private truckers union, said Hamas was acting against gangs that had terrorised people in areas controlled by Israel.

“Those gangs looted aid and killed people under the protection of the [Israeli] occupation,” he told The Associated Press, saying they operated in so-called red zones where Israel had ordered people to evacuate. The Israeli military did not respond to a request for comment.

[...]

Residents of the area, who spoke on condition of anonymity out of security concerns, said the gang, led by Hussam Doghmush, was known to loot aid convoys and rob abandoned homes in areas controlled by the Israeli military. They said Doghmush was among some two dozen people killed in the clashes with Hamas, including a local journalist and a son of a senior Hamas official based outside Gaza.

Hamas-linked Telegram channels said Hamas had targeted “collaborators and traitors” working with Israel. The Hamas-run Sahm security force, which says it targets looters and other criminals, shared footage that appeared to show its forces killing eight people execution-style in the streets as people cheered. It said the detainees were gangsters.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

"Could now threaten the ceasefire"

Lol, yeah sure. This is what will do it im sure. Nothing else at all...

By the way, for those that actually read the article you'll notice it's super interesting the parts that OP quoted there and the parts that he left out.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 3 weeks ago

Nobody batted an eye when Israel killed 5 Palestinians a day or two ago

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Liberals when the Zionists kill civillians and label them terrorists: "Israel has a right to defend itself from terrorists"

Liberals when Hamas acturally kills terrorists except they're backed by the GDF: "Wahhh this is a violation of international law which I suddenly care about now"

[–] absentbird@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't consider myself a liberal, but personally I would prefer everyone to stop killing each other. Such a waste of life.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 weeks ago

I do consider myself something that many on Lemmy would call a shitlib (I'm a socdem basically) and I concur. Would be nice if people stopped killing each other, regardless of who's doing it to who.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

These people are guilty of terrorism, murder, rape, theft of critical supplies during a genocide, complicity in genocide, and collaboration with the Zionists. What are they supposed to just apologize and everyone moves on?

[–] absentbird@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I don't know, send them to the hague or something. I think spontaneous extrajudicial executions in the public square aren't going to help the people of Gaza feel safe, but maybe I'm projecting.

What an absolute joke, send them to the Hauge? What are they gonna do, tell them with very strong words that they're disappointed? International law isnt real, international courts don't really exist, it is the job of Gaza to make sure that their criminals face justice.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

The Hague is a joke which should be closed. International law is dead and the West killed it.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

This seems like Israeli propaganda. Are they allowing impartial journalists into Palestine? Israel killed over 250 journalists.

[–] BCBoy911@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It was interesting to see all the mainstream outlets suddenly talking about extrajudicial killings in Gaza like they haven't spent the last 2 years cheerleading for an extrajudicial genocide in Gaza. The articles are all meant to present an implicit message - "look at how scary and violent these Arab barbarians are. This is what happens when you let them run their own country instead of killing them all".

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The media cheered on Israel bombing a hospital and killing 20 people because there might have been a "Khamaas camera!". (there was not, it was a journalist camera)

But suddenly they start talking about due process and law when Palestinians execute Israeli collaborators.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Hamas aren't friendly lovable rebels. They're a product of oppression, people turned extreme using extreme measures.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Vietcong executed collaborators and most people today don't deny that they was still a resistance group

[–] Spesknight@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

The difference between resistance and terrorist is only who wins in the end.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, it's Hamas that's threatening peace? I seem to understand that Israel is already ahead of the game on that. Sigh.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 weeks ago

This isnt threatening peace. Trump was aware and said they are allowed to police the strip.

Same game, different team. Never was about freeing Palestinians from Hamas or IDF. Civilians are just meat for them to express emotion through violence.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

How does Hamas executing Israeli collaborators threaten a ceasefire exactly?

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In this conflict it is only a matter of time until the ceasefire is broken. Anything could be used as a cause.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I think you're right on your first sentence. Second one is entirely superfluous; and doesn't have substance in support for the question.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 weeks ago

Back to business as usual?

load more comments
view more: next ›