this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
234 points (98.8% liked)

Fuck AI

4469 readers
722 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works 57 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel a class action lawsuit incoming: "Advertisers using customers likeness in ads, without providing compensation"

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ever notice how now a days you have to scroll through the whole TOS before blindly clicking AGREE?

Yea...

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

TOS means nothing in court.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Here's hoping American courts keep meaning anything.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

True. Knock on wood.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

In case you were wondering how they would get a picture of the users face…

“DirecTV's screensavers will let a user create an AI avatar of themself by scanning a QR code on the screensaver”

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 25 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The only good that can come from this is butt faces.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe that will be the data which finally breaks the image generators back.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Cat anus faces

[–] londos@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Or Bill Morrow, the CEO.

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thanks for this. I was imagining some dystopian requirement that you had to let them scan your face or pay an extra $10 a month or something.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 weeks ago

Give them a month

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ok. But why would anyone actually do that?

"Ooh I wish I was in that dishwasher ad"

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

No. No, I don't think it will.

[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

I'd be more angry about this, but I just found out that DirecTV is still in business.

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

I don't get how this would ever be a good idea.

I would be extremely uncomfortable seeing my face in adverts, even for products I use. I'm already uncomfortable with adverts using personal recommendations based on tracking my web history & habits.

I actively avoid those products in the future, and I can only see this alienating their marketing base further.

[–] MrEff@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, you mean the real reason there has been a push to get us to use face ID verification on every site that depends on ads?

[–] hotdogcharmer@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 weeks ago

Marketers ruin everything. Marketers are liars. I've worked with marketing departments in every job I've ever had, and they're scum every time. Social media obsessed weirdos who can't do anything honest and authentic. Freaks.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What better reason not to get DirecTV

[–] Steve@startrek.website 6 points 2 weeks ago

Im surprised it still exists

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 16 points 2 weeks ago

DirecTV's screensavers will let a user create an AI avatar of themself by scanning a QR code on the screensaver. Afterward, they can use the avatar to browse through different AI content. Users will also reportedly be able to dress up their AI avatars, allowing Glance's screensaver to recommend real-life products to purchase by performing a reverse-image search.

Who is gonna even willingly do this? You're not creating a Mii to put into Wii Sports. It's just to advertise to you.

(the company Glance, mentioned in the quote, is the company providing the AI screensaver ad technology to DirecTV)

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 15 points 2 weeks ago

Avoid DirecTV like the plague? I'm on it...

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

I'd cut the plug off the dongle doodad and then run it over if this happened to me.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Bwahahahaha! I don't even watch TV any more. Every time I wind up at my parent's home I cannot believe the idiocy that's on the TV. Ball game is on? They've made sure it's impossible that a single frame of the feed does not show at least one advertisement, whether "splashed" over the video or covering every square inch of the location they're broadcasting.

"Television" is officially dead to me, but I get that a lot of people still watch it. What I don't understand is WHY they do.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

People with DirecTV will enjoy looking at my face, I guess?

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Could I just use my cat's face?

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

Your face, maybe. My face, no.

[–] J92@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I was scrolling through my LG TV's settings not long ago and the amount of times it vampirically suggested I invite it onto my WiFi made me laugh.

No my friend, you're my dumb TV. My laptop already doesn't allow ads, so why would I need you to for a less navigable UI?