this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
1031 points (98.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

13693 readers
259 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Right. Get those kids if from front my truck. I gotta go to Walmart to get a bag of cool ranch Doritos.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

No. Why do you ask? I always drool like this. Wanna see my Trump branded drool rag?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

States should be taxing or increasing licensing fees on these vehicles to pay for the increased medical services because of these unsafe vehicles.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

The state is actually a big part of the problem in this case. Small gas trucks are effectively illegal.

Automakers were fucking around with vehicle classifications in the 2000s to get around CAFE regulations. Things like the PT Cruiser were being classified as trucks. So starting in 2012, CAFE regulations were changed so that fuel economy standards were based on vehicle footprint. But it had a huge unintended consequence.

Suddenly a Toyota Corolla had less-strict fuel economy standards than small commercial vehicles like the Dakota, S-10, and Ranger. Notice how all 3 models were discontinued by 2012? And now that the Ranger is "back" its footprint is larger than some old F-150s?

As the CAFE standards get stricter over time, manufacturers have learned it's easier to just make the car bigger than to meet the fuel economy standards. They've made the marketing about penisnsize and shit, but it's really more about meeting regulations.

A more recent casualty was small cargo vans. The Transit Connect, ProMaster City, and NV200 were all discontinued by 2022 because small cargo vans can't meet CAFE. This is also why New York had to cancel its new Taxi fleet that was based on the NV200.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think I've seen the source video on Donut Media, there a was funny moment with a rando on wheelchair and they used him as example

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Plate does read "Donut". The plot thickens.

[–] xiao@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago
[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

WTF ? Now we have to deal with monstertrucks ?

[–] rising_man@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

How would they carry stuff, guns and their alpha male ego? Did you think about that? /s

[–] polle@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But what would the people with their small self-esteem do then?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Why does the front of the car needs to be that high? Does it serve any utility?

[–] psud@aussie.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago

It looks "mean" which buyers apparently like

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's purely aesthetic.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's for real big dick alpha males.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 2 points 3 weeks ago

You have a point but the margins are like 30% more plus these dumb chucklefucks are willing to pay 67%apr over 9 years I think we can afford the odd child death

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›