this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
80 points (95.5% liked)

Canada

10619 readers
488 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IndridCold@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I say we do this. The ONLY reason Canada put tariffs on Chinese EVs is because of the US - back when the US was our friend. Those days are well over.

From what I understand, Chinese EVs out perform the US ones (charge quicker with longer range) and are way cheaper.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I have a security concern with Chinese EVs.

They're far too computerized, and connected, at this point.

The last thing I want is the ability for the Chinese government to disable a quarter of the Canadian vehicle fleet if they decided they wanted to. Or potentially even worse than disabling them in some cases.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

American cars are the same, and China hasn't joked about making us their 24th province.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Canada should not buy those american F35's for exactly the same reason(s).

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

I don't disagree with that.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

This is possible with most modern vehicles today. They nearly all have cellular modems built in and very few have the driving related systems separated from the 'infotainment' crapware. 2014ish jeeps could be bricked by OTA updates to the fucking radio, there's a good Defcon talk about it

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kyle@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

With Canada so obsessed with keeping vehicle manufacturing jobs to the detriment of every Canadian not wanting to buy American cars. Why does Canada drop the Chinese tarrifs but demand certain assembly and manufacturing of Chinese vehicles happen in Canada?

Sounds like a win win, but they are too stuck on the idea they should only manufacture cars from incumbent companies that are stuck in the past. Canada has significant geological resources like lithium and rare earth metals is an even better reason to be excited about EV production in Canada.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If Chinese manufactures can exceed Canadian standards, provide spare parts for a minimum of 10 years from the date of manufacture, provide a minimum of 10 years of software support/updates, AND allow all software to be audited for both safe function and security. Then sure. Bring on the cheap EVs.

(But not even our current domestically produced vehicles meet those requirements)

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)

It's a serious security hole cause the software can be updated through network, the version gets audit and all the follow up update can be good, but the moment it needs to go rogue you just need 1 malicious update to have serious and wide spread harm/attack on a button.

IMO for any vehicles to allow over the network update is beyond stupid. (yes, that includes Tesla.)

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Hey kinda like the F-35

It's fine though when the Americans do it do is.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

Ten years ago I'm not sure I'd have said this, but now: fuck it. We should just get into bed with China. They seem totally uninterested in wars at all unless you're Taiwan, which we're not. Trade matters. They seem stable. Sure there are some human rights issues but given all the human rights issues fucking everywhere right now, like. I dunno. I'm for it.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don't even think China is interested in any wars over Taiwan. I'm fairly certain it will be a peaceful rejoining once the US crumbles, akin to East and West Germany during the fall of the Soviet Union.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds like an easy decision; we sell our rapeseed and get non-American cars.

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

On October 8th, after Carney's meeting with Trump, Lutnick said that the US is going to insist on dominating the North American auto market and have assembly all happen in the US with Canada being forced into a subordinate role.

We need alternatives.

I doubt we will make this deal with China, because the US will not tolerate that, but it would be much better for Canadians.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rdca@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Canada needs to diversify the trade to rely less on the USA. The current gov has a huge problem on their hands but also opportunities to do something new!

When it comes to the EV tariffs I see opportunities for Canada, we have factories, some of the raw materials, Human Resources, experienceand logistics in place for the automotive industry! The Ev industry needs more than the cars there is a new ecosystem that can be worked with Chinese companies by doing knowledge transfer, manufacture autos + parts by bringing the suppliers as well. EVs need batteries and the charging network, we can bring these items to the trade talks.

China al has the largest high-speed rail network and why not expand the deals to help Canada build our high-speed rail Network?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Devanismyname@lazysoci.al 10 points 3 weeks ago

Do it. Canola is an important industry to Canada and we don't make evs here anyway.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Australians have access to Chinese EVs, why can't we?

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There is/should be a lot of room for compromise.

A mix of "reasonable" tariffs and quotas to start, to make Chinese EVs competitive without destroying domestic manufacturing is a good path. Canada needs investment. Whether foreign auto makers do it, following through on previous commitments, shutting out China can be a reward for them.

Without choosing to provide value cars to Canadians, Canada could offer agriculture for Chinese (solar) energy trade. Pemitting them to boost capacity even more.

Instead of begging the US to buy (and own through investment) our resources, Chinese development would help significantly as well.

Corrupt ideology programmed into Canadians is bad for Canada. We need new friends instead of abusers, and the only reform of an abuser possible comes when they beg for forgiveness when you flirt with new friends.

[–] BCBoy911@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

We don't even need to be "friends" with China, we just need to recognize the situation we're in and work with them pragmatically. Rejecting China in the current economy is like rejecting gravity.

[–] DonkMagnum@lemy.lol 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Wanna see a trick? I can make bots appear, watch this:

Maybe if China agrees to stop being a threat to Taiwan, stops interfering in our politics, and stops spying on us, and builds some auto plants here to employ some Canadians, we can talk about their fucking EVs. Until then, we already have one international bully as a trade partner, we don't need more.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Canada lied about stop selling arms to israel who are we to gives lessons?

The reasons we have tariffs on China has nothing to do with bs you spew we did it to protect the usa car industry

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] redwhacker@social.trom.tf 9 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

@DonkMagnum @IndridCold Not a fan of China, but it's sort of rich to demand non-interference when inferring some interference ourselves.

Maybe if China agrees to stop being a threat to Taiwan, stops interfering in our politics

Also this is rich:

builds some auto plants here to employ some Canadians,

So does that mean we will be basing our canola growers in China?

[–] twopi@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago

You forgot one thing, when OP has a bad take it is called "the correct opinion and the obvious stance expressed with freedom" when some else does (or has a good take that OP doesn't like) it's called bots interfering in our politics.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Serious question; how much does China subsidize EV sales to glut markets and buy market share? I'm guessing it's non-zero.

I'd love to see canola embargoes open because I have a bunch of bins full, but is this fair to other vendors, domestic and other foreign makers?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 5 points 3 weeks ago

Seems to me that the happy medium here might be a lower tariff. 100% was never justified, but 10% or 25% might be. Just enough to allow European and Japanese manufacturers (I don't give a damn about the US at this point) to price their vehicles somewhat competitively even though they don't have the advantage of ignoring labour rights.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

It's not like Chinese EV's are bad, but they have started a war to overtake EV industry.
Their government is founding EV companies, to advance and take the lead, putting at risk companies like Ford, BMW and so on.

I sawthis video, and I saw how they have managed to change battery instead of charging the car, and I was impressed of what they can actually do.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

I don’t think Ford and BMW will be in that much danger, and given how long they’ve had to address this inevitability isn’t that just them not investing in their future and by capitalist standards their deserved failure if it were to happen?

Hell, large manufacturers often fought EV companies so they wouldn’t have to compete. It was cheaper to hurt the competition than it was to innovate so they did that instead. Maybe if they didn’t spend so much time and money attacking renewable resources they’d have more governments in place who actually supported giving them support for developing this technology.

“Woe is me, I on-purpose created an environment where all my most loyal customers have an irrational and deep-seated hatred for the thing I now want to do!” Like, cry me a river.

Besides, we don’t need more cars. We need more infrastructure that makes them unnecessary and we need to bring back the mid-density, walkable small town. We need to bring back the rail and bus systems we already had but tore up and/or knee-capped.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] A_A@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Between USA that has gone completely mad and this other superpower, China, that supports Russia, which wages war against its allies, this put Canada in a difficult situation. Canola and electric vehicles might just be entry level bargaining points ... who knows, certainly not me.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't drive, but that'd be cool if canola oil became even cheaper. :3

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The oil would become more expensive, because it can now be exported cheaper.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'd buy a Chinese EV. I need an inexpensive vehicle to go from A to B in a city. There doesn't seem to be an inexpensive option anymore in North America.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

"inexpensive vehicle" usually means a pre-owned vehicle and there are plenty of affordable pre-owned EVs and hybrids on the market. If you're the kind who buys new cars, then Chevy Bolt and Nissan Leaf are the least expensive. If you compare with new ICE cars, don't forget to account for gasoline cost.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Mext municipal election you should make sure to vote for the person who’s championing stronger public transit options. I still have my car from loving in Ottawa but I barely touch it these days(usually for going to Ottawa, because I can easily get to Gare Centrale with the metro here but once I get to Ottawa it starts getting rough fast if I try to leave the LRT(and before the LRT it was a complete impossibility). Not to mention that it costs more because of the mess we made of privatising CN and shooting VIA rail in both its feet.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›