this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
1049 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

75959 readers
2777 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“This is getting ridiculous and I'm about to just toss the whole thing and move back to Google,” one Redditor said of the “full-volume” ads for Alexa+ on their Echo Show.

Oh sweet summer child, Google is NOT going to be any better at this. That will just be changing one corporate evil for another.

(page 4) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 1 day ago

Additionally, Echo Shows may play audio ads when users listen to Amazon Music on Alexa.

Idiots. It's called - get a media player and a bluetooth speaker of which the media player can connect to. Both of which don't contain ads.

How inconvenienced are we that simply having a basic alarm clock - which has no ads, a dumb tv - that gives you no ads and among other stupidly simple but workable technology is just not enough?

They're just glorified tablets slapped onto the Echo speakers. Fucking morons.

[–] firepenny@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Same. I owned several devices at the time.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 5 points 1 day ago

I've got to wonder what they thought they were buying. It's not like the warning signs were sparse these past, oh, ten years or so.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 3 points 1 day ago

can these things be reflashed?

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Wouldn't this be a better fit for leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world ?

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] derry@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] D@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Looking At Martin Freeman

[–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Nah this is just their snack.

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I haven't had this problem, yet

[–] Anomnomnomaly@lemmy.org -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Morons buying moronic 'smart' devices, unable to understand that they're the product, not the consumer and they have sold away the rights to their eyes and ears with their purchases.

My house contains no smart devices that can harvest data from me (my mum does use a samsung smart TV from 2016) and all devices have everything disabled and other things installed to block data collection and tracking... I can't stop 100% of it, but what little trickle they do get is basically worthless.

My eyes and ears are not for sale, nor is my privacy.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Don't understand your downvotes, but probably owners of such bugs :-)

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 day ago

If there is a trickle, you do not know what you're doing.

This whole comment has a, "I am very badass" vibe to it.

You're probably sending more data to the cloud than most because of the hubris.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›