this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
503 points (93.1% liked)

CosplayGirls

1328 readers
1 users here now

A community featuring SFW Cosplay Girls.

Rules

Please headover to CosplayBabes for nsfw cosplay girls.

Lara Croft by CyberKittyXO

Harley Quinn by KayPikeFashion

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From 4chan

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yyprum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

I have to wonder what is the implication or intention with the photo and the cosplay (thanks to the comment indicating where it comes from). I mean, no one chooses this display thinking they won't get attention, maybe she likes the attention, and good for her if she does. But the fact that she took the photo by the side of this sign... Is she implying that it helps that it's written? Enough for her to feel empowered to dress however she wants? Did she feel like she needed to take the photo by the consent sign to make a point that not enough people follow the guidelines?

I ask this because I would want to know if this is a sign (pun intended) that as a society we are going in the right direction, allowing her to dress in this outfit, or the contrary? It would be nice if the former would be the case.

That is beyond any kind of discussion about the appropriateness of it, in my opinion it is great if anyone is feeling safe enough to do this. Nudity needs to be normalized, nudity is not sexuality, but I digress and that's just my personal point of view.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

I'm upset that signs like this need to be posted. I've only been to one comicon and took shitloads of unconsented pictures, because I was suffering from hella anxiety and would never have worked up the nerve, and because if I asked everyone I'd have been asking all day. Roadhog+junkyard? Photo. Amazing Link costume? Photo. Green Ranger hanging out of a delorean? Hell yes Photo.

Nothing creepy though. I went out of my way to not point my camera at anyone dressed even remotely sexy, because I dont need the hassle. I also dont need the creepshots. I have the Internet. We have access to more porn than can possibly be consumed in a hundred lifetimes. Im not about to go stealing apples when I live in an orchard.

[–] Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Congrats on completely missing the point

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I see the word hands now. It was the "photo with or of" that drew my attention.

Sorry bud.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] j4k3@piefed.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the message is a bit vague in context. It is not really about taking candid pics of people in situ. It is saying don't invade a person's space to stand right next to them for a selfie, or demand that they stop what they are doing to pose for your picture. That kind of picture is not your inferred right with some imaginary implied consent. This is the outlier intrusive behavior that must be addressed as odd. There are a lot of these types of entitled people in the world, but they are still a minority.

There are also narcissists that sadistically dress for attention and then believe they have a right to gatekeep who is allowed to look at them. Both groups are people with mental health disorders.

This sign is about lessening the negative emotional impacts others have on people that have gone to extreme and amazing efforts to participate in cosplay. It is about being respectful and appreciative of those people. It is about calling out the worst mental health disorders present at the event.

Photographing people candidly is not the point, but even in that circumstance. Taking unsolicited candid pictures of specific people is as uncouth as a person that talks about their legal rights in a social setting to entitle their behavior. Asking people to take their picture is just good manners.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think the message is a bit vague in context. It is not really about taking candid pics of people in situ. It is saying don't invade a person's space to stand right next to them for a selfie, or demand that they stop what they are doing to pose for your picture.

It might be my autism, but this was completely lost on me and interpreted as "don't take any pictures with people in them without permission"

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

No. Not autism, just badly phrased as part of a confusing gray area of "When are you allowed to use your phone in public?" online discourse.

There's plenty of people who sincerely believe you don't have any kind of rights to photography of anyone at any place for any reason, without explicit consent. There's others who believe heckling and cat calling is perfectly normal acceptable behavior. And then there's a thousand lines in between.

Standing half naked in a garish "please pay attention to me" costume near a sign that says "Stop taking my picture without asking me first" is confusing to the point of feeling like rage bait.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Ibuthyr@feddit.org 7 points 3 weeks ago

The sign specifically says to keep your hands to yourself. If you can't do that, then you're a fucking sexual predator. Anyone putting the blame on the woman needs their moral compass checked thoroughly.

That said, I most certainly would look, perhaps stare even. That's just the way my instincts work. I also see how people would try to chat her up. But this is definitely not an invitation to start touching her without consent.

[–] petersr@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›