this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
627 points (92.1% liked)

Political Memes

9641 readers
2155 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 1 points 48 minutes ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago)

What if, for every day the government is shut down, all elected members of congress, the senate, and maybe even the executive get 2 months taken off their term.

That way, they either get it figured out somewhat fast or we have a special election and elect people who can. Tired of these incompetent people getting away with being bad at their jobs. No other industry allows that - even food service workers can get felonies for mishandling food. That affects like, a few people at most. They are affecting MILLIONS

[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago

If those fools (the current batch of demos) ever regain power i do not EVER want to hear the word partisan again. I want NOTHING to ever go the republikkkans' way ever again. They've proven who they are. Fucking Nazis.

(/progressive)

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 14 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

You guys need a multiparty system.

And you need to weaken your federal government.

And you need to stop worshipping a bunch of 18th century slave owners.

Basically, the American political system is ridiculous.

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

We need ranked choice voting and compulsory voting. The people who could add their votes and make a difference don't vote because "one vote doesn't make a difference". We make voting compulsory and you're gonna see a lot of people that can't afford the fine for not voting turn out

[–] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Before mandatory voting, first the day of elections needs to be a mandatory day off, with large fines to anything but the most absolute essential emergency services running.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Run the elections over two or three days, and require absolutely everyone to be given at least two of them off, no exceptions.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

We need a war and a new constitution. Hate to say it, but the countries that the Allies bombed to shit in WW2 and had multinational efforts to rebuild and restructure legally have fared better modifying their guiding documents than the US. We’re hamstrung by poorly defined ideals and the interpretations of some rights while others are written in stone by ideologues.

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Under the Biden administration the Democrats had exactly 50 votes of 100 in the Senate if you factored in some very conservative Democrats who held everything up. If you don't want compromise you do need to vote in enough Dems to avoid Joe Manchin being able to hold everything up.

Y'all need to stop voting in paralyzed governments and then complaining they compromise and don't do anything.

Edit: This was not a fillibuster issue as they were always struggling to get 51 votes. And no, primarying Manchin was not the solution as the replacement would have just lost to a Republican who would have voted for Mitch McConnell as senate majority leader. Holding the Senate in a useful manner requires some margin.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 7 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah... that's how democracy works. You vote for a party to do what you want and it's going to take a lot longer than you'd like. You don't vote for a party that'll do what you want and things get worse for you.

It's sad how Americans on both the left and the right are against democracy now. The American people have failed democracy and are incapable of admitting it.

[–] TheKingBee@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

How long do people need to wait though? It's been bummer comprise candidate after bummer compromise candidate for 50+ years while peoples lives are getting worse.

Rent is up, medical care is up, food is up, transportation is up, housing is up, yet wages are stagnant.

50% of all economic activity is driven by the top 10%, the working class is being entirely cut out of the economy as a consideration.

Sure the democrats are better than republicans, but that doesn't help people afford rent or go to the doctor, so wtf are people really voting for? The chance that in 20 years after a lot of compromise things might be slightly better maybe?

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is that the people who can't afford rent and don't vote? They HAVE given up on democracy, but most of us haven't. So it looks like the whole country has but we havent.

[–] TheKingBee@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

If democracy continuously fails to improve their lives why wouldn't the give up on it?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 29 points 21 hours ago

Get a progressive to win a primary and Democrats are working with Republicans to defeat them.

[–] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

The illusion of choice...

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

THE TRUTH is there so much voter suppression and rigging voting machines going on many places dont get much representation. aside from gerrymandering. this discourages voters, and thats what gop wants.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 69 points 1 day ago (29 children)

When was the last time the Democrats held 50+ percent in both houses to pass legislation without needing to cooperate? Believe it was Obama for 2 months in 2009. So all complaining about this for the last decade has been moot.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I assume you mean 60+ to break filibuster.

And weren't a lot of them solid conservatives too (not like Manchin, further right)? Hence why pro-choice laws were never solidified.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

60% for Obama, which is what was needed to overcome the filibuster, an utterly broken part of Senate procedure.

We had 50+VP for the first two Biden years, but that gave us no room to negotiate with our own party - or 'our own' party, considering that two of the most troublesome fuckwits later became independents when they decided they'd done all the damage they could inside the party. Add to Biden himself being not much more than a milquetoast moderate twat, and you have a recipe for very little getting done.

Not nothing. But not nearly what needed to be done, realistically speaking.

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why is that 60+ not a requirement for Republicans to pass the legislation and ratify nominations that they want? The Republicans haven't met that threshold since the 67th Congress back in 1921.

The 119th, 115th, 108th and 109th congresses which were all Republican trifectas didn't meet that criteria and the "tea party" and "establishment" flavors certainly aren't any more of a unified front than the democratic party.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The current legislation they are trying to pass in the Senate is an example. Part of the reason we are in a shutdown, from a legal standpoint, is because Republicans do not have the votes to bypass the filibuster.

As for why nominations don’t require the 60%+ threshold? Because it was something previously agreed between both parties. There are very few things that you can actually Filibuster. You may have heard of budget resolutions as an alternative to getting things passed, it’s for if they want specific economic legislation passed that can’t be filibustered.

Either party could in-theory get rid of the Filibuster, but that is a can of worms neither party wants to go for as a short-term win. The Filibuster is what prevents the worst legislation from even seeing the light of day.

The only reason I could see Dems getting rid of the Filibuster would be if they wanted to uncap the House, but that in itself would require a Dem trifecta and over 50 members in the Senate willing to approve uncapping the House.

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Because Republicans don't infight anywhere near as much a Democrats.

I'm pretty convinced that trump has gotten as far as he has because the Democrats parts is like 50/50 corporate shills on Trump's payroll and ideologues.

Of course we never get anything done. Half the party is hellbent on selling out their constituents and the other on performative "moral victories."

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Because Republicans don't infight anywhere near as much a Democrats.

Oh, they do. But it is significantly less theatrical.

Half the party is hellbent on selling out their constituents and the other on performative "moral victories."

Beautifully said, and that's what I wanted to draw attention to.

[–] insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe 19 points 1 day ago

Even if we ever get that again, people will be sorely disappointed because legislation will be too busy fixing damages from the previous administration to make much actual progress. Which will be forgotten by the next election (same as it ever was).

In 2048 Reagan's ghost will still haunt the country, plus Trump's ghost too.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The dems are entirely lame while in office.

That's still LEAGUES better than the genocidal fascists of the GOP.

Maybe if you want progressive reforms, stop bitching and vote for progressives in the primaries. Not that it'll matter now since millions let the fascists win so we won't have any elections any more.

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 6 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Keep blaming a 1% of internet leftists for not voting a genocide supporter out of principle instead of the establishment for running Ms. "We will build the deadliest armed forces in the world during an ongoing genocide that I support".

Bernie was the compromise, and the dem establishment essentially antidemocratically couped him out. Now the dems deal with the consequences: they'd rather see Trump in office than a progressive (look at the collabbing between dems and reps in derailing Mamdani).

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

Keep blaming a 1% of internet leftists for not voting a genocide supporter out of principle instead of the establishment for running Ms. "We will build the deadliest armed forces in the world during an ongoing genocide that I support".

TRUMP IS ACTIVELY COMMITTING MORE GENOCIDE AND ON US SOIL.

BOYCOTTNG VOTING BLUE OBJECTIVELY ENABLED MORE FUCKING GENOCIDE

Get it through your thick fucking skull that you people chose the PRO-GENOCIDE option.

No one should ever take you people seriously ever again. We have MORE GENOCIDE NOW because KAMALA LOST AND TRUMP WON.

Wanna know how we'd have ended up with less genocide?

LEFTIST COULD'VE VOTED FOR KAMALA AND MADE HER WIN.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Keep blaming a 1% of internet leftists

I know we’re just throwing numbers around here but wasn’t the margin like 1%?

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 2 points 15 hours ago

The difference of dem voters between last and previous elections is surely higher than that.

[–] danielton1@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The dems dropped the ball in the 2024 election, by pretending Biden was sharp as a tack and gaslighting us about his mental health until they couldn't hide it anymore during that disastrous debate, and since they lied about him so long, they replaced him with someone who flopped HARD in 2020 and lost the election in 2024.

I voted for Bernie Sanders in the primaries and watched as the DNC did everything they could to destroy him and install a good little establishment guy like Biden.

When Trump's a psychopath and the opposition keeps gaslighting us about the mental health of the president so long that they have no choice but to hand pick a replacement because it's too late for a primary, a lot of people are just going to say "fuck it" and not vote.

They're still being delusional and refusing to face facts. Hopefully they can learn from this.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I get where the DNC fucked up.

Everyone except the DNC acknowledges where they fucked up.

Its the millions of leftist voters who are in a desperate need of self reflection for how they fucked up by boycotting the election.

Millions of marginalized peoples' loves were at stake with the 2024 election, both domestically and abroad. People who leftists are supposed to care about, advocate for, and pico the best VIABLE option for, which was Kamala.

Boycotting Kamala wasn't "sticking it to the Dems". It was deatroying the future and lives of the millions of marginalized people the boycotting left abandoned to fascism.

Its extremely easy for those in pirivelge, be it financial, racial, sex, gender, etc, to look at Kamala by herself and proclaim she was a shitty candidate. She was, objectively.

But 2024 wasn't about Kamala, it was about millions of people who now have ICE and the military dissapearing them, and canceling elections nation wide in 2026 and on.

We cannot keep pretending everything that's happening was an unknown. We were warning people about P2025 for over a year, but self righteous egomaniacal leftists either didn't listen, didn't believe it, or simply don't actually give a fuck about the marginalized people now being sent to concentration camps.

[–] danielton1@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

The DNC needed to do a lot better to challenge Trump and they failed miserably. They propped up a guy who could barely form a coherent sentence. If they really, seriously believed Donald Trump was the existential threat to this country that he totally is, they should have been up front about Biden's mental health in time to hold a real primary.

Kamala Harris didn't lose because she is a woman of color. She lost because (A) she's a terrible candidate who can't answer questions consistently, as also seen when she ran in 2020, and (B) people felt like they were lied to by the Dems so long that they lost faith in the entire political process and didn't show up to vote. To act like Trump lied and the DNC told the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth is just plain wrong. The truth is, in a democracy, nobody is owed any votes, ever, and you can't just blame the citizens.

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

It’s nice to see my seething rage brought to bear in your comments.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

Show up to the fucking primaries and help progressives put fucking progressives in Dem seats. Otherwise these neoliberal ghouls will keep warming the fucking seats, though that's assuming the current fascist regime is too busy tripping over its own distended asshole to successfully implement the one-party state it so desperately desires.

Bernie got 25% of the vote in the 2020 primaries. We fucking need people out here.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›