160
Texas governor calls for removal of rainbow crosswalks, calling them a safety issue
(www.nbcnews.com)
The Texas governor is a safety issue
this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
160 points (98.2% liked)
News
32704 readers
2647 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"Texans expect their taxpayer dollars to be used wisely," which apparently means removing already existing crosswalks and making new ones, for no other reason than the manbaby is afraid of rainbows.
dont forget about the state freezing over each year, people dying, and the govt not doing shit to negate this problem for next year.
So far Austin has sworn to comply and SAN ANTONIO has refused! Cant believe we lost Austin first!!
...as a resident of both cities, austin is f*cking provincial as heck with delusions of grandeur while san antonio is legitimately cosmopolitan...
So which is it, a safety issue, or a "political ideology" issue?
And since when has a group of people existing been a "political ideology"?
The existence of anyone not straight, white, wealthy and christian has always been political in the USA
It's an issue for the safety of his fragile worldview and values.
America’s war on color continues.
Waiting for them to ban rainbows from kindergartens.
So there's this daycare down the street from me. It has had a rainbow colored access ramp for as long as I can remember.
It's now painted black.
It could be completely unrelated, but I highly doubt it.
Just like the famous Rolling Stones song. "I see a kindergarten access ramp and I want it painted black..."
If it had grip sand integrated into the paint it would make sense that it needed repainted, and getting one color of deck paint is cheaper, and black paint absorbs more sunlight so they need to salt less.
Still sucks, but it’s the same reason we can’t have cool cars anymore.
It did not have sand in the paint. It had the adhesive strips on top of the paint.
Well then fuck those fascists
...all the props in the world to peter cullen, but the fascist party have become f*cking rainbow brite villains...
Good riddance, those rainbow crosswalks jumped me stole my wallet, and dressed me up as a woman 6 times last week.
Maybe you should have worn something less provocative. Rainbow crosswalks will be rainbow crosswalks, after all.
Terrified of a rainbow.
Look. I don't disagree on the safety thing. We chose white reflective lines for high contrast and visibility for what it is. We don't paint our stop signs brown or green, and we don't wear blue high-vis vests.
The crosswalk is a bad thing to colour up. I like what the Iceland solution was:
Anyway, here I've gone and agreed with a Republican and suggested safety markings should be consistent, so get with the downvoting.
You definitely can wear blue high vis vests. I have them in orange, yellow, blue ,green, pink, red and white.
I'm going to downvote you but only because you didn't even glance at the article.
The pictured approach is clearly one in which the safety markings remain visible and contrast sufficiently with the bright rainbow colors.
Something someone did in Iceland isn't relevant. Maybe in their culture it's considered polite to mow down pedestrians, there's no way to know.
I kind of suspect that it's not safety driving his concern
this isn't exactly something that would warrant state-level concern
but I do think that it's a bad precedent to be modifying street markings for political reasons.
-
I doubt that this particular incident is likely all that risky, but if it becomes normalized to modify street markings, someone sooner or later is going to do something that they think is clever and really does muck up drivers.
-
This stuff goes both ways. If you have the left modifying street markings and it's let stand, it's not as if streets are some sort of left-exclusive forum. You can be pretty sure that if this sort of thing is let stand, then the right is going to do so too. I'm pretty confident that if someone started painting anti-LGBTQ markings on streets, plenty of people here would be pretty unhappy. I don't really want political discourse to wind up being who is willing to throw more graffiti down.
It should be possible to find plenty of places in Austin that are okay with putting up signs or murals
things that aren't street markings
that are pro-LGBT messages. That avoids the whole issue that they're arguing over.
kagis
After an LGBTQ+-inclusive church in Austin, Texas, was vandalized on Thursday, the community came together to transform the act of hate into something beautiful.
The vandals tore down the Pride flag at Life in the City UMC and graffitied “Pride was the 1st sin” on the front of the building. Afterward, volunteers joined the church for a “creative restoration project” to transform the graffiti into a mural featuring two Progress Pride flags flanking the church doorway.
I really think that this is a better approach if one wants to put out a message.
EDIT: Also, on purely-pragmatic grounds, I suspect that the road surface is probably about the most wear-heavy place to paint something. Like, paint something on a wall, and it doesn't have vehicle tires tearing it up and requiring frequent repainting to look decent.
EDIT2: You can even see a mural on a building about ten feet behind the rainbow crosswalk in the article's picture. Which one looks in better condition to you, the crosswalk or the mural?
I think something people might be missing here with painting the crosswalk is that paint can make the crosswalk much more visible. Streets murals, and crosswalk paint can cause drivers to slow down. Going further paint can be used to create an optical narrowing effect which causes drivers to subconsciously be more cautious and thus slow down. Slower speeds makes streets safer which directly saves lives. It's not just political, it's proven - Look up daylighting and optical narrowing.