this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
63 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

4354 readers
213 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Internet providers may no longer have to itemize discretionary fees under the FCC proposal

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 43 minutes ago* (last edited 42 minutes ago)

What exactly is the point of making them list the fees anyway? So you can shake your head at the ridiculous fees, ask them to waive them, and they say “No”?

Does it actually benefit anyone to have them all listed? Did it make them stop charging these fees?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I was playing this game long before Trump came around, didn't lose once, got boring.

When you see a headline that doesn't include any mention of Democrats or GOP, ask yourself, "Do this law/proposal/regulation hurt people?" By hurt, I mean that it hurts more people than it helps. Don't think I need to explain the rest.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 42 minutes ago

How does this hurt people?

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 7 points 3 hours ago

This was passed during the previous administration, so of course they’re trying to get rid of it.

“It’s not good for consumers it’s bad for business!”

[–] Goretantath@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Instead of removing the rule, force the companies to issue less fees. Its just that simple..

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 39 minutes ago

They’re not mutually exclusive. Listing the fees is pointless if there’s nothing anyone can do about them.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Consolidated Fee: $34

Fee Consolidation Fee: $23

Fee Consolidation Fee Convenience Fee: $52

[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 hours ago

Fuck off, we need to know everything they are nickel and diming us for!

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 hours ago

Incoming Fee Itemization Fee