this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
531 points (99.8% liked)

News

32704 readers
2713 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 0 points 16 minutes ago

i was going to say, but MIT is a pipeline for Israeli weapons research industry, scientist, engineer that dont feel conscience when supporting israeli efforts.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 22 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This is particularly impressive considering 48% of MIT's funding is from the federal government. This is the largest percentage of any university.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

MIT is in a unique position to negotiate here though as that funding is a bargain for the US. And honestly MIT's reputation and capacity to attract the global top talent in stem will remain long after a funding battle unless they trash it.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah being ranked as one of the best schools in the world will hopefully help them gain leverage. On the world stage there are only a few U.S. schools that say "the U.S. is still good at things" and letting MIT fall from those positions will make the U.S. look like their re-imagining of education is the complete failure we all know it is going to be. Would someone else take their place, yes. Will they be from the U.S., no. I was hoping UCF would reach that point somewhere along the line, but I'm biased and I think they got a boot on their neck for the last number of years that stopped them from research growth and diverted it to stupid Desantis shit.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 41 minutes ago (1 children)

It's not even that, MIT has this reputation because they produce results. They're well known to be the upstream source of massive amounts of technological innovation with all the financial benefits that comes with

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 39 seconds ago

I agree, that is what makes them rank high. It's what makes Harvard rank high while turning out 50% shit students in my opinion

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 35 points 6 hours ago

pretty sure MIT did the math

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 54 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Universities have legacies to maintain. Some have already irreparably fucked that up.

Looking at you, Columbia.

Straight to the trash, any resume from Columbia. Sorry not sorry. Your institution is beyond tainted. Just tell me you got a GED instead.

[–] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean arguably Columbia is perfectly mantaining its legacy.

[–] cdf12345@lemmy.zip 2 points 31 minutes ago

King's College

[–] bo5on@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I'm sorry how is that fair to current students or alumni who predate current events?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Fair isn't how things normally play out. If hiring was fair, the name of your University wouldn't have half the impact it does on law firms and such. Any good company will know they are still a good student if they graduated, but stains come from before/during/after no matter what.

Were the Harry Potter books a great series for kids at the time, I say definitely. Do the stains from the authors views after they come out stain the actors/actresses who don't denounce them.. unfortunately yes. You see it in so many threads shitting on anyone willing to work on their upcoming series.

Is it reasonable... Many people think yes, so they will lose audience. Many people think no, so they will keep that audience. If Rowling died, would that stain on the product still hold in 10 years.... It will stay for some forever.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 31 points 6 hours ago

It isn't.

That's the nature of of ruining a legacy.

[–] tal@olio.cafe 68 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

"With respect, we cannot support the proposed approach to addressing the issues facing higher education,” the Massachusetts Institute of Technology president wrote in a letter.

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WithDueRespect

With Due Respect

"Why is it that whenever someone says 'with all due respect', they really mean 'kiss my ass'?"

— Ashley Williams, Mass Effect 1

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

All due respect, if getting spit on's how respect is now defined
-Run the Jewels

with a video that's only gotten more grim with time

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-M15L4BTqI

Highly appropriate though, if we’re being honest

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 90 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Well done MIT. Hopefully this will encourage others to stand their ground too, even if they're not so well equipped with other sources of funding as MIT.

[–] dan@upvote.au 19 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Good; hopefully other universities follow.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 17 points 10 hours ago

Welp props to MIT. I would love to see foreign countries refuse to recognise any sort of certifications from any place that does.