this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
545 points (99.8% liked)

196

4604 readers
1205 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 151 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Inglorious Basterds tattooed a Nazi, so they can never hide.

We should do that.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 77 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

What if they eventually change tho. Then they just have to explain their shitty past to everyone. A Nazi without a brand can just become a normal person. Once you brand them, you give them a reason to never change. Why would they if they've been told that's all they'll ever be?

Punishments like this assume people can't change or that bad people never become good.

We're not better than them because we can match their cruelty, we're better because we recognize the humanity of everyone, even "monsters."

Edit: a word

[–] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 14 hours ago

if they've truly changed, they'll accept the brand as a sobering reminder of their past.

kinda like how Germany keeps Auschwitz as a museum.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

A serial murder killed a hundred people. But maybe he'll change. Surely he learned that killing is bad... just let him go free.

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A complex political system is not the same as the acts of a single person. The Nazi killing machine had lots of people involved that just did small things far removed from the actual killing. Eichmann organizing the trains is a big example. There are countless clerks, secretaries, technicians, bookkeepers, machinists, drivers, kitchen staff, technicians, and so on that kept the system running.

There are countless human scum nazi who were fine with their neighbors being murdered as long as they stayed comfortable, even as they worked for the killers.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean it seems unlikely but what if they could be rehabilitated? Instead of keeping them as a prisoner indefinitely we might be able to have them contribute something to society?

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Perhaps. But are you willing the explain that to the next 100 victims?

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why would you let them return the society if they weren't rehabilitated?

[–] Soulg@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because for too many people it's easier to just give up and do horrible things to people they decide are horrible than to try to make any better meaningful changes.

I'm Jewish and I have no problem with violence against Nazis or fascists but I draw the line at shit like "kill them all" or whatever. That's for the top brass, taking away some random person's chance to learn from their mistakes and grow isn't worth it.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 15 hours ago

I think it's an oversimplification to say that many people just give up and start being arseholes. I think most of it is education and their treatment and experience in their formative years including in utero. They either don't or can't think through the full consequences of their choices or they've been conditioned to think the shitty action is fine.

People can be educated or reeducated at any age which can help them understand why their actions might suck.

Fixing a person broken by fetal alcohol syndrome or years of mental or physical abuse is a lot harder if it's even possible at all.

Does branding them or murdering them benefit society? How are we any better than those people we branded or murdered, should we then not be branded or murdered ourselves for doing objectively evil things? Where does it end?

Certainly people who do bad things should be imprisoned, but the goal should be rehabilitation rather than retribution.

Peacetime is a lot different than war where it's kill or be killed, but war crimes are a thing for a reason. The Nazis did some truly horrific things, but the Americans murdered 2 million odd Vietnamese in the Vietnam war, many of them civilians, many of them suffering horrible deaths being burned alive or being doused with agent orange, should we also start carving symbols into the faces of Americans because they supported horrible things, or even just not giving individuals a chance for rehabilitation?

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

For too many people, admitting being wrong and a hate-filled savage clothes-wearing monkey, so easy to manipulate and they fell right in like a mindless idiot... is a fate as bad as death.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.zip 43 points 2 days ago (4 children)

A lot of people are not mature enough to hear this. The ideal outcome of meeting someone you dont like is that person changes over time to be better, hurting them just drives them further away from you.

You dont "fix" an abused dog that barks at everything by hitting it.

[–] Comrade_Spood@quokk.au 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then how do you fix it? What is your mature wisdom that magically solves the problem of fascism without harming anyone?

I aint saying we brand Nazis, but I also don't think we should be treating them like an abused dog. They arent afraid from trauma and abuse. They want to dominate and abuse others. An abused dog does not seek violence, it lashes out because it feels threatened and cornered. Nazis are looking for violence.

It is ok to punch Nazis. If they don't want to be harmed, literally all anyone is asking of them is to stop being Nazis. It does not seem like a big ask to me

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago

Well good thing Nazis arnt dogs and don't deserve the benefit of the doubt an animal with sub human intelligence gets.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This very much. I understand the sentiment though. I think we need to start changing the narrative. Let's ask Trump supporters what they think the government exists for? What should a government do? Why even have one in the first place if it's not there for it's citizens? I don't think they look past their nose for a thought and take what propaganda they are given at face value. We need to open the dialog and ask them what they think a government does, then ask them how they expect to see those things become a reality.

If they are just full of hate, nothing can be done, but if they've been led down the wrong road, how do we correct them? By showing them the way. Ask them what a government should be doing and ask them if the current one is doing so? Not just with words, but with actions too. All one can do is try. The game is rigged against you, but at least we can show them the board they are playing on?!

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

I bet they'll love it if you tell them that you'll "drain the swamp" of government corruption and fight against child rapists.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 days ago

There's too many of them and they're ruining the country. We have to do what we must and if they might have come around in 20 years too bad they're a Nazi now and we got work to do. We can be nicer to the stragglers after naziism has been firmly put down

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I once believed like you, but I've slowly come to realize a lot of people refuse to change. It's not that they're incapable, but they just don't want to.

So they pretend to change instead because it's easy. Then a couple of decades down the line they start to drop the act and go back to being terrible.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

People who just had godawful opinions should be spared. People who spread the propaganda, all while pretending to be "moderate, christian-democratic conservatives" should be not.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If someone becomes a Nazi then there already was a shitton wrong with them for them to even turn that path.

I believe in redemption; but I believe also that once you go that far right, it is hard to redeem at all.

If they want to redeem themselves, they should try:

a) opposing all forms of authoritarianism

b) neither spouting nor consuming hatred against anyone who's not a billionnaire

c) and they should oppose all billionnaires, especially the ones that don't do either of the above.

Basic decency requires very little effort. I'm going out on a limb and say that the only good fascist is a dead one.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

being a nazi is an immutable decision and is not taken lightly. THIS IS WHY IT IS SO SERIOUS.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The guy from American history x was a reformed neo nazi, and he was ashamed of his tats, but I don't think he got rid of em. I haven't watched it in a while though.

[–] guy@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I bet plenty of Nazis becomes Nazis because they lack love and a community, not because they just hate others. Well, plenty become Nazis for that reason as well

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

if the community you choose to become part of involves genocide - it’s still a choice one makes to become part of it. are you trying to say someone who actively helps a genocide can be reformed in such a manner that the stain of their choices can be forgotten by those who were victims?

[–] guy@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No
I'm saying that I believe there's Nazis that didn't become Nazis because they just wanted the Jews gone but because they felt like they had nowhere to go. At least if you listen to some ex-nazis that found their way out from the funnel of hatred and loneliness.
This obviously doesn't forgive any crimes committed or the hatred spewed, but Nazis are still humans and thus not a homogen mass driven to hate by the same reasons

edit: this is of course true for all hate driven groups. If you can't find companions who loves, there's always company in hate

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I prefer the cutting the swastica on their forehead

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Hey this guy says he's not a Nazi. All of Germany and I haven't met one Nazi yet."

-Frank Perconte, Band of Brothers

city officials: we were never nazi sympathizers
director: ok i'll use newsreel footage
city officials: from today on you didn't let me finish we were never nazi sympathizers from right now.

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Interesting fact about Austria in the context of WW2, Austrian fascists (Austrofascists) and Austrian Nazis were political enemies. The Austrofascists were opposed to the Anschluss and the Nazis were in favour of it.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Also, the actual Baron Von Trapp was an Austrofascist. Disney white washed the fuck out of that story.

Makes sense, Nazis were pan-Germanists (revisionist idiots) and proper Austrian fascists would want the empire back.

[–] CubitOom 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is such a much better movie watching it today than when I watched it as a kid.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Right?! I had forgotten like half of the movie was not as musical but a very serious historical drama, lol