this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
246 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

4142 readers
215 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Clock is ticking...

[–] xep@discuss.online 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The trouble with these FOSS phones is support from banking, payments, and government apps, which are also the main things that can't be run from a laptop. They usually also require NFC support, and that implies having the right kind of security certificates that these organisations recognise as well.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yep, there are also development tools missing (at least at the level Android and iOS have them) and the motivation for developers to support yet another platform with no users (at least initially). A good example is Microsoft which thrown awful lot of money and resources at Windows Phone only to give up eventually. OTOH it'd be interesting if i.e. EU decided to support a new phone/OS, that'd certainly help with those delicate apps at least.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

A good example is Microsoft which [threw an] awful lot of money and resources at Windows Phone only to give up eventually.

I just want to point out that they started or bought themselves into a Windows phone idea no less than three times before giving up, ruining Nokia in the process.

Oh. And some of the Nokia handsets were gorgeous.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago

They trick is to do what MS did in the early years, provide an API layer for compatibility.

No reason they couldn't throw on an Android API layer specifically for targeting things like banking apps, etc,(maybe not games).

Phones have significant power these days.

[–] xep@discuss.online 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Chinese government has thrown its weight behind Huawei's HarmonyOS. I wonder what the EU will do?

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago

With current (and in general) EU leadership I wouldn't be optimistic as they don't understand any of it.

[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

You can do your banking on any web browser, including mobile web. You do not need a god damn app for everything. NFC antennas are supported on credit/debit cards that have no screens or CPUs, certs are handled by the non-client device, so it sure as fuck will work on any hypothetical FOSS phone. This is a dumb as fuck take.

[–] xep@discuss.online 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm glad you have all this figured out!

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago

There's zero technical reason to need an app to perform HTML presentation.

That's all an app does anyway - use current web tech to present a page.

Try Hermit or Native Alpha, both present websites as apps, and work very well.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago

To that end, I use apps like Hermit and Native Alpha, which make an app-like experience for any website.

[–] krigo666@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They should team up with other projects like Ubuntu Touch, SailfishOS, GrapheneOS, PostMarketOS, etc, at least for the base OS and device drivers. This would mean a lot more hardware available, and some pressure on manufacturers to be compatible. One project I'm really interested on is the Liberux Nexx.

I know this is a bit too hopeful, but if we don't get at least some of the general public on our side and put pressure on manufacturers then it really won't happen.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 7 points 2 days ago

I don't see this happen, sadly. I mean yes, few enthusiasts will jump aboard, but that will be it. I'd go with AOSP modified in a way that can run google services and their apps in isolated mode, which at least GrapheneOS is doing (if I'm not mistaken).

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

GrapheneOS really needs something like that, since Google stopped shipping drivers and locks down Pixels now. Maybe some collaboration could help here