this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
434 points (98.7% liked)

News

32713 readers
2632 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 14 points 2 days ago

What will come first; the AI bubble popping or a US civil war?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's almost as if there's an entire class of people who do this purposely, and walk away billions of dollars richer.

Gotta siphon up all the wealth and resources from the proles once every decade or so.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's almost as if the entire system is designed for this and cannot sustain itself otherwise... surely that's not the case?

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Guys but a very smart person on LinkedIn said they discovered the formula E = MC² + AI

How could it be a bubble if the universe depends on it?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago

I think that was satire. I hope. It's honestly impossible to tell anymore.

[–] RVGamer06@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You must've dropped this: /s

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If I need to explicitly state that I do not believe the universe depends on "E = MC² + AI" I might as well stop using this website, there's no way any reasonable person would read this as anything but sarcasm.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you not noticed just how many unreasonable people there are around you?

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you calling me an unreasonable magnet? 🤨

[–] Guilvareux@feddit.uk 2 points 23 hours ago

Unreasonably magnetic 😉

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t think it was necessary, seemed pretty clear to me

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 76 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Everyone look out, the banks have made their money so it's time to dump on the poors again.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the banks only make money after the crash, when people can't pay their loans.

then they have to find baggers for the property they seize, only if they cant flip those in time do they come out ahead

[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Investment banks and the primary equity market. They’ve already traded their long positions for shorts

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Time for the yellow trickle down.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago

Don't forget that the main players in this theater of hell are all paying each other with the same money in a circular bullshit toilet bowl further inflating the bubble.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 13 points 2 days ago

rivals

I don't remember spending $1.5T destroying 200,000 acres of farmland to build data centers for pets.com and GeoCities.

[–] ODGreen@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-case-against-generative-ai/

A good read for anyone who wants to read in detail on how fucked it is.

[–] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"Here’s Why This Is Bad

I dunno man, let’s start simple: $50 billion a quarter of data center funding is going into an industry that has less revenue than Genshin Impact. That feels pretty bad."

-My favorite quote from this blog post

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (21 children)

When there are 4 or 5 companies worth over a trillion dollars each, and those companies combine for 60% of the volume and value of the S&P and NASDAQ, and they are all in on ai, well....

Buy ammo, I guess.

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It’s not quite right to say those companies are “all in on AI” when their core businesses are still based on physical products and established services. These were already highly successful companies long before the AI boom. If their valuations are inflated because of the hype, a correction wouldn’t send them to zero - it would just bring their prices back in line with their actual underlying value.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fair though "actual underlying value" is a bit of a fiction in general. There really no objective numerical value that is Inherent to anything.

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 1 points 18 hours ago

No, but there is a price that people are willing to pay for something which is what economy is based on.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Fair.

But, nvidia (the largest by weight/volume/value on each of the indexes) would be almost nothing without the ai hype, and the loss of Chinese contracts will see it plunge regardless of a bubble.

Google, ms, and apple have added nothing of worth to their products while pumping billions to their ai surveillance bots.

All told, the value of the indexes will plummet like Wile E. Coyote when cartoon reality kicks in.

The bottom, however, will hit much harder than he ever felt.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] ODGreen@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn't it bigger than the subprime mortgage bubble by this point?

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Substantially bigger, but that's not the whole story. Subprime mortgages were interconnected to everything banks did. The AI bubble isn't quite so connected in the same way.

Compare this to the Chinese property sector bubble. Around 2020/2021, there were a lot of stories about how China had created a huge bubble and was going to take down everyone when it popped. Instead, it just sorta fizzled out, at least from an outsiders perspective. China has usually kept away foreign investment in their real estate market (along with pretty much all their big companies). There just wasn't that much fallout to be had outside of China. Tons of doom headlines popped up in Western media, but it was a nothingburger unless you were somehow embedded in the Chinese real estate market.

Let me be clear: the AI bubble popping will hurt. At this point, there's no way out of it, and it needs to pop sooner rather than later. However, comparisons to the 2008 financial crisis don't tell the whole story.

[–] ElegantBiscuit@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah the financial crisis bankrupted the banks themselves. The structural foundation of the financial and banking industries were interconnected to bad mortgages that were distributed into financial instruments everywhere and speculated on like crazy by everyone, because they were mortgages and considered safe like bonds. Part of the reason why companies like GM went bankrupt was because their financial arm was significantly invested in mortgages, banks failed because their entire financial model was centered on mortgage returns, and people defaulted on houses en masse because they were allowed to get mortgages they were never able to afford.

But no one investing in stocks, particularly tech stocks, is doing so without explicitly gambling that money. A lot of venture capital might collapse, retail investors are going to get shit on, the general economy will slow as it does during a recession, but mostly this will play out like the dotcom bubble and be a large asset correction in the stock market. A few years of correction, consolidation of the industry, and everyone will pile onto the next bubble in a decade.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago (1 children)

“It’s a ‘good bubble’” - Bezos

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

All bubbles are good bubbles if you have the liquidity to survive the burst.

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago

Or better: buy the dip.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

this wrong, it's 4X bigger than sub prime crash.

[–] TheWeirdestCunt@lemmy.today 43 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Wasn't there some report that this is 17 times bigger than that?

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

this is definitely gonna be a big one, always is when there's blatant fraud making front page news regularly. and the wolves are running the show for the forseeable future so it'll probably keep on going...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

I want to everyone to think about this, because I am very old. I have lived through many bubble bursts, I have lived through the recession. I think the most adept comparison to AI is when companies got this idea to do outsourcing. They outsourced EVERYTHING. Call centers, data development, manufacturing. It didn't work after a few years of the hype it came back to the US. We found equilibrium. Yes there is still some outsourcing but it's more globalization. AI will have the same thing. It will probably hang on a few more years then things will shuffle back to humanity. The difference then is there were still minimum wage increases on a federal level and it does concern me that there hasn't been since my youth. It was a regular normal thing in my youth.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

What I'm really curious is how far the bubble bursting will spread beyond the US, as America seems to be the nation which, by far, went more all-in on this, plus, ironically, Trump's aggressive and chaotic trade policy has pushed other nations to try and isolate themselves from dependency on the US.

Also the weakenning of the Reserve Currency status of the USD (which was already happening and has been accelerated by Trump's actions) also reduces that as a pathway for transmission of any Economic Collapse in the US - the USD value crashing is less bad for other nations the smaller their reserves in USD and USD-denominated assets are.

This will almost certainly be an Earth-Shattering Kaboom in the US, but might just be Really Bad for the rest of the World, plus it will probably be worse the closer a nation is to the US as a partner, so there might be interesting results in terms of for example Canada not being quite as badly hit now than they would be a year before whilst for the UK it will be the other way around.

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Everything is so interlocked it will fuck things up everywhere. The sub-prime crisis was sparked by American companies packaging up American mortgages to sell as assets, but it still was a global crisis.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This should not come as a surprise to anybody. Not because of AI specifically, but because this is how tech hype always works. The more hype the bigger the crash.

[–] higgsboson@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Has no one here ever heard of the business cycle? This is literally econ 101.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Can't wait until we bail out most of silicon valley because they're too big to fail.

The dotcom peak was over a massive number of companies that folded, here it's pretty much just a few companies.

Now they may be talking about a lot of rich assholes that would be directly affected by the bubble bursting if they're actual evangelists of hallucinating LLMs but I guess I don't see that massive impacts that this AI BS has over the dotcom crash had where jobs were massively lost over a span of a few months.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And just like how online e-commerce went away when the speculative companies went broke, surely when this market corrects AI will vanish and everything will go back to exactly how it was before.

[–] Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What? Who gives a shit if AI vanishes or not. The greedy turds manipulating markets and raking in the money now won’t be the ones facing the consequences; that will fall on the rest of us peasants.

[–] tal@olio.cafe 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you're confident that a given company is overvalued by existing investors, you can sell it short, make money off that assessment.

That being said, if you're wrong, you can lose money doing the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›