this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
117 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

7496 readers
615 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

β€œWe have unleashed a monster,” Mette Frederiksen tells Danish lawmakers.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because nobody in this comment section are going to know this, as they are just looking to dog on danish politicians (which they deserve and is based), please remember that Denmark has a universal digital ID system. If you are a citizen, you have a digital ID. It is not hard for, say, Facebook, to authenticate you once with this ID. It does not leak information continuously, and a self-respecting platform, unlike Facebook, can simply keep a boolean in their database for "is age verified" after asking the ID system what your age is.

The only real issue here is that users have no granular control over what information is taken out of the ID system, so Facebook could just take your full name, address and age.

It's also not going to be applied universally, because for one danish politicians don't know that the internet exists outside of TikTok and facebook, but also because that's not possible to implement.

If you are a danish citizen, and you're smart, you go to borger.dk and apply for Name & Address Protection. Then even MitID can't leak a lot of that information. It's free and easy.

[–] beetus@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Thanks for the info I didnt know Denmark had a digital id system. Kind of makes this an easier pill to swallow, imo.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Here comes the deanonimisation of the internet by fascist surveillance capitalism oligarchs. Soon you will be a criminal if you even think about the fact that privacy was once a basic human right.

[–] Ruigaard@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Alright but let's forget the how for a sec. I think this is not a bad idea to limit social media for kids.

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's not that the idea is bad. It's that politicians and especially at the moment Danish politicians, don't have a f**king clue what they are proposing. This coupled with the Danish proposed chat control, won't be enforceable

[–] Kn1ghtDigital@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

"I need privacy not because my actions are questionable, but because your judgement and intentions are." - StΓ©phane Bortzmeyer

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Should be the parents decision to ALLOW the government to ban social media for a child.

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can't wait to see how they plan on doing this if chat control goes through. Everyone will have migrated from the mainstream apps to a more sinister and darker part of the world wide Web.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Knowing Denmark probably by mass surveillance. β€žProtectingβ€œ children by sending their data directly to foreign intelligence would be up their alley.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Does this include places like discord? Because lonely autistics who are bullied IRL like I was are gonna have a bad time.

[–] 1XEVW3Y07@reddthat.com 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Same for trans kids, or gay kids, or anyone that doesn't fit the norm.

I understand that social media can have detrimental effects on everyone, especially the youth. But let's stop pretending like social media is akin to heroin, with no potential benefits. Social media is a great place for some people, teens and preteens included, to find a sense of community and belonging.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Honestly, I think we need to just get rid of created feed algorithms. I think that is what makes social media so destructive compared to traditional chats

[–] kbal@fedia.io 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Makes me wonder, what do they think is the appropriate legal punishment for a 14-year-old caught logging in to Instagram?

[–] Muffi@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Simple. You punish the legal guardians of that child.

[–] Ibuthyr@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago

This would be surprisingly efficient because 90% of parents that I've met have no idea how harmful this shit is. It's insane really.

[–] troed@fedia.io 4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Almost correct. What should be banned is algorithmic social media. Non-algorithmic is just fine also for kids.

[–] lumen@feddit.nl 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is it though? Even non-algorithmic social media has downsides.

[–] troed@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No. The algorithms, created to maximize ad-profits, are the ones promoting "engagement" which due to human nature always means anything that polarizes will be shown higher up in feeds than calm rational discourse.

[–] lumen@feddit.nl 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, very true. But non-algorithmic social media timelines are also bad for mental health.

[–] troed@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why do you think so? What data supports that statement?

(I'm old enough to have grown up with non-algorithmic social media)

[–] lumen@feddit.nl 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There are multiple known possible negative effects of social media, not all off them caused by algorithmic feeds. Development of a negative self-image is the first thing to come to mind.

[–] troed@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That, too, is caused by the algorithms. Else you would not be constantly fed with unattainable body images etc.

I think too many are unable to picture what algorithmic-free social media even looks like. Mastodon is a start, then you have Pixelfed (Instagram) and Loops (Tik-Tok) you can try as well. It's really that different.

[–] lumen@feddit.nl 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But don’t you think that even without algorithms, people on social media would have the urge to falsely portray their lives as perfect (or at least exclusively post about the positive aspects thereof) - leading to jealousy, FOMO and negative self-image for some of the viewers?

[–] troed@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why would people view/follow them? "Influencers" only exist because of the algorithms. I've seen several try on Mastodon, followed by loud complaining and leaving when they realize that posting a lot of hot takes doesn't generate followers.

[–] lumen@feddit.nl 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sounds good, I’ll be taking a look at Pixelfed et al. But what do people post? Photos of food, friends and holidays, like on Instagram back in the day?

[–] troed@fedia.io 2 points 3 days ago

Its pretty hard to have a social network without an algorithm.

get all these posts and arrange them in chronological order is an algorithm.

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Would be a good start.

What should be banned is collection, storage, aggregation and trading of personal data. Social media needs to be unprofitable. The surveilance economy is not good for free societies.

The companies would still engage in it. But then you at least have something to hit them over the head with.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That would mean regulating the companies, you know, the guys with all the money.

[–] troed@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago

The EU has no problems doing that.