this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
64 points (100.0% liked)

London

1294 readers
5 users here now

"who’d a thunk it"

For discussion about London including the surrounding Greater London area. Discuss all things from news, travel, culture, and general life around the capital and largest city of England!

Rules and other welcoming info can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Can we not go 5 freaking minutes without hearing about Donald Trump?

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago

If only he were removed from somewhere

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

No, it's a UK story. This is about the next Reform candidate in a by-election.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"But while some blockages in our biggest sewers can weigh as much as 25 elephants..."

The arbitrary size comparisons are my favorite part of these stories.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Got to make them relatable to the Muricans as well.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago

“But while some blockages in our biggest sewers can weigh as much as 1 American”

Done

[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

It should definitely be illegal for wet wipes to be advertised as flushable. Maybe it already is in the UK, but in the US it still is not.

EDIT: Maybe there should even be a legally mandated warning label about not flushing them.

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 12 points 1 month ago

Some of them have the ambiguous:

That's obviously:

  • Do not throw this in the toilet.
  • Please throw it directly into the sea.
  • This product can be used to attack Koopa Troopers.
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago

they should be banned

[–] Nuerion@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i mean to be fair they do flush they just fuck up a lot of shit after the fact

[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago

I would argue that for something to be "flushable" it has to be something the sewer system can actually handle.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did tRump fall into a manhole?

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

careful pal, that's terrorism now. congrats, youre on a list.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wonder if you could burn this to make a significant amount of electricity?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't want to think about the pollution that would produce.

[–] MouldyCat@feddit.uk 1 points 4 weeks ago

The most green option is probably to just sell it on the open market. Some takeaway shops would give you a good price for it.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

LOL, my first thought! That represents a shitload of energy, but I highly doubt London has a way to handle that properly.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

Can it be burnt as fuel?