this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
106 points (99.1% liked)

news

164 readers
581 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Bondi also repeatedly defended her refusal to publicly release case filesinvolving former Trump ally and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — and refused to answer whether the FBI discovered photographs of Trump with “half-naked women,” allegations that Bondi called “salacious” and designed to “slander” the president.

You ridiculous twat.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

“The fact that people think those photographs exist hurts the president. It would be much better if people didn’t think they exist”

“Do they exist?”

“I’m not going to answer that! I’m under oath!”

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If its slander, she is the AG and could bring a civil case, but since she hasn't, I'm gonna assume its not.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

The last thing Dumpy wants is this case going anywhere near a court, regardless of civil or criminal.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

"refused to answer" is so much more incriminating than "no". She played herself

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They're sending the military to harras cities they see as their political enemies because this is an authoritarian coup.

Expecting them to give a shit about logically defending their bullshit excuses is a grave and naive misunderstanding of the situation.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I don't think calling it out means anything about what you expected