this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
46 points (100.0% liked)

news

164 readers
461 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Trex202@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

He got what he deserves

That said, why was the vehicle banned? Was it the car or the previous owner?

Edit:

"A Tesla representative eventually got back to Boycott and let him know that “the car is currently unsupported for supercharging and warranties are voided due to [it being a] salvaged vehicle.”

....

The Elon Musk-owned company said connecting a damaged vehicle to the Superchargers is a safety issue, which is why his car was removed from the network.

...

Tesla does offer an inspection option for customers trying to get their Tesla back on the Supercharger network, but for a fee of a couple thousand dollars."

Oh fuck

[–] TammyTobacco@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago

He deserves it for buying a Tesla at this point.

[–] Kenny2999@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Maybe Daniel should have last named Tesla

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

One more reason not to get a used Tesla.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)