this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
111 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7452 readers
171 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Turns out magic credits dont do shit. The only thing we can do at this point is degrowth. Which makes all the capitalist piggies gasp.

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 days ago

The poor shareholders and CEOs. My heart goes out to them :(

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well yeah any potential solution is going to mean reduced potential profit, which you could describe as degrowth, but that would be the worst possible way to describe it.

The reason why we haven't gotten anywhere with carbon reduction is because wealthy people block any efforts.

Telling them that degrowth is the solution is unlikely to motivate them.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Thats okay, its not supposed to motivate them. Their power needs to be removed. They clearly cannot govern the world responsibly.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How do you propose to do that given the current slide into fascism?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The first step would be to educate people with anarchist literature. It would be a process dismantling hierarchies without destroying our society of connectivity but I believe its possible. I believe people are, and are becoming more, altruistic on average otherwise civilization would not have been an emergent property of our collectivism.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I feel like you must have slipped through a rift in the time / space continuum and are visiting us from another reality.

The first step would be to educate people with anarchist literature.

In 2025, we're completely unable to expect "people" at large to engage in any kind of reasoning.

You can't just propose to "educate people with anarchist literature" like that's some kind of solution.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/william-gillis-bad-people

If you feel you can't educate others, assist those who can. You'll never stop bad people from existing, but you can remove the ladders they seize to lord over us.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago
[–] SOULFLY98@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

Carbon offsets are like net carbs. It's just bullshit to make people feel like they are doing something.