Cloud Security

828 readers

2 users here now

Preventing storms.

Rules

Be excellent to each other!
Use the article title as the submission title. Do not editorialize the title or add your own commentary to the article title.
No vendor spam. Zero tolerance for content marketing.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

0xCBE

CLOUD Act and pCloud (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 5 days ago by TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works to c/cloudsecurity

0 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I can see this community is very much crickets but maybe someone would have some insight...

If pCloud has a facility in Austin, TX USA - then its EU storage ain't shit for privacy because of the US CLOUD Act, right?

Why would anyone pay more when the vulnerability is built into the company? Or am I reading that wrong?

CLOUD Act says even if the EU protects the user data privacy because it's stored in the EU, if the company storing it is US based and/or if the company storing it has facilities also in the US, that leaves them open to subpoena.

Thoughts?

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

there doesn't seem to be anything here