this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
765 points (96.7% liked)

Humor

8810 readers
127 users here now

"Laugh-a-Palooza: Unleash Your Inner Chuckle!"

Rules


Read Full Rules Here!


Rule 1: Keep it light-hearted. This community is dedicated to humor and laughter, so let’s keep the tone light and positive.


Rule 2: Respectful Engagement. Keep it civil!


Rule 3: No spamming! AI slop will be considered spam at the discretion of moderators


Rule 4: No explicit or NSFW content.


Rule 5: Stay on topic. Keep your posts relevant to humor-related topics.


Rule 6: Moderators Discretion. The moderators retain the right to remove any content, ban users/bots if deemed necessary.


Please report any violation of rules!


Warning: Strict compliance with all the rules is imperative. Failure to read and adhere to them will not be tolerated. Violations may result in immediate removal of your content and a permanent ban from the community.


We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Why do phones have to be as slimmed down as a coke addicted supermodel from the 90s anyway?

I'd much prefer they shrink the fucking things enough that they fit in your pocket.

[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 124 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This perfectly illustrates my gripes with whatever is driving the trend of these super thin phones.

First, is anyone even asking for phones to be thinner? Then there's the camera bump sticking out like a wart. And beyond that, it gets put into a bulky case anyway which negates the super thin thing entirely.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 week ago (10 children)

one has to wonder what the ideal thickness is, are we supposed to think it's just never thin enough? will we have phones that literally cut into the skin of your hand as you hold it and they still brag about how the new model is 4 atoms thinner?

it's not like they're getting easier to hold, modern phones are so huge that you need a popsocket for it to be reliably and comfortably held.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The iPhone 4/SE1 was the perfect design.

No real camera bump, single hand hold, light, durable with a metal back.

If we just added a modern OLED screen, and a modern chip and battery, that design would be perfect.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

The 13 mini was close but the stupid camera bump ruined it, bring back the sleek slab

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] dotslashme 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I actually like thin phones. I find them easier to hold, but I would gladly sacrifice the camera hump for a completely flat back.

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Before looking for thin phones, look for phones that don’t have a glass back so that not having a case is an actual option.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They still have glass fronts man. Five-ish feet drop onto the screen against concrete with no case? Doesn't matter what the back is.

Glass backs mean that almost any fall will damage it, but non-glass backs only eliminate cases if you can somehow ensure it never lands face down or on a corner.

[–] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Glass backs have very low friction. Set the thing down in bed and its natural floor seeking instincts kick in.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s not an option anyway. Metal scratches and dents too easily for that to be viable.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] warm@kbin.earth 62 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your phone is only as thin as it's thickest point.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Kill the bump! Give me better cooling and battery life with replaceable battery.

[–] 01189998819991197253 26 points 1 week ago
[–] Anivia@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

and battery life with replaceable battery.

You mean a $99 magsafe powerbank that only fits on this specific phone doesn't satisfy you as a replaceable battery?

/s

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 49 points 1 week ago (8 children)

No, but hell no

Give me a chunky phone with a week long battery

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Apple: here is your phone with a weak, long battery.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I had an Oukitel that I ran for almost 4 weeks. Had to charge it for a trip off grid. Talk about chunky!

Might buy another model, but had to drop Verizon to get it working and T-Mobile took a week to figure out how to activate it. PITA, but it was solid once working. Great BT speaker, couldn't kill the battery, everything worked great. Carrying the thing was a pain, even with a pack. Not sure I want all that mass again.

If you want a phone you can beat a man to death with, Oukitel it is!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] minimum@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Better yet, week long replaceable battery

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] tatann@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I can understand people wanting “smaller" screens cause they don't have huge hands/pockets

But slimmer phones when the cheapest ones (< 200€) already are like 8mm, I don't really get it, at this point it's just a structural weakness, like the geth would say

The only advantage would be to have a bulky phone case while still maintaining a 6 or 8 mm width, but still it wouldn't prevent your phone from bending

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do phones really need to be so skinny? Part of the reason I always get a case is not only for protection, but also to deliberately make it a little thicker.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (4 children)

No, they're just desperate for some kind of differentiator at this point because phones haven't meaningfully changed in five years. Hell, maybe ten.

Yeah, the only real improvements in phones over the last decade are the adoption of USB-C and the addition of extra camera lenses, and I never really use the extra lenses on my phone.

I replaced my 2016 Galaxy S7 last year with a Motorola G32 mainly because the Galaxy wasn't holding a charge or getting software updates anymore. The G32 is actually lower in spec in a few ways (lower-resolution screen, no wireless charging) but it's still more than adequate for my needs, has a headphone jack and MicroSD slot and supports LineageOS (although I haven't installed that yet.)

Even the S7 upgrade wasn't strictly necessary but I saw a good deal and didn't like the way my LG G2's volume buttons were on the back.

We're well past the point where smartphones should've been fully comodified and where we should be able to get generic versions based on common standards (i.e. a common platform open to OS developers without the need for a specialized build for each phone.)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 18 points 1 week ago

This has become one of the useless marketing figures everyone chases because they made it seem important in the first place.

I absolutely prefer having something a bit thicker, as it fits the palm better.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Next version isn't even going to have a camera. You'll just generate the image

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the phone will just generate shit all the time - texts, voices, images, music - all to post on AI-gen only social media. And it doesn't even need human interaction to do that but you are legally obligated to buy 12 of these per year or you will be deported to Moldova.

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As somebody who extensively travelled to Moldova for the wine, food, and the parties I say, not too bad. I'll be in the first train

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

It's really funny to me that we're having these conversations all over again. I had the Moto Z back in 2016 and it was almost half a mm thinner than the 2025 iPhone Air. (As always, here's Apple still playing catchup, a decade later this time.)

I honestly didn't mind it - the Moto Z had a Moto Mods battery that snapped on the back (in a MUCH more elegant manner than Apple's magsafe battery implementation in my opinion) and so I always knew that was an option if the battery life became a concern over time. And I loved that the extended battery made the back of the phone perfectly flush with the camera bump too, so if you elected to add battery life, it was literally what we've all asked for the whole time: Just make it thicker and add battery. But if you didn't need extended battery life, then you had a razer thin phone (and a camera bump), probably the thinnest I had until the Fold7 at 4.2mm.

I wish that Motorola's solution had stuck, because they solved this problem already, meanwhile everybody is here reinventing the wheel over and over again in 2025. 🤦

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I think what people want is longer-life, user replaceable batteries. They didn't need to be thinner. Apple says, "Look! It's thinner! Thinner is better!", so the fanbois say "Look mine is better because it's thinner, Apple said so!"

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Apple got rid of the headphone jack but not the camera bump..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aggelalex@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tbh, the camera bumps are nice if you use phone cases. They allow the phone+ phone case thickness to be much thinner than otherwise. Provided they aren't enormous unexplainable bumps like the pixel phones'

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Pretty well packed with sensors isn't it?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] metoosalem@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Yes Butt !

I like big butts and I cannot lie

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (8 children)

honestly I don’t mind it - the grooves allow you to actually hold the fucking thing one handed without being a basketball player

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The next iteration will be a cheese wedge, 1mm thin on one side and 1cm thick on the other.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I'd rather have that. it'll actually stay stable when you put it down, plus the screen would be slightly tilted upwards so you can see it better when it's just there on the table.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] vinnymac@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s because most customers use cases. They know this, and so Apple can say they made it thinner, when the reality is that it’s always not that thin. Especially when you can throw a case and a mag safe battery on the back and make it even thicker than the pro model.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Stfu. Only psychos carry around a naked phone.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Well, you cannot cheat physics. You get two of resolution, depth, and thin-ness. If they want resolution and depth, they need the optics to do this.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Give me a fuckin' Pipboy. I'll be so ripped after a month of watching porn on it while wearing it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't mind a camera bar (or "visor"). It's better than the stupid bump they used to use, because it's stable, and it also provides a slight angle that makes the phone a little more visible when it's laying on a desk.

What I don't like is a super thin phone that has no meaningful battery and is easy to bend. "Bend" means that dropping it results in more than just shock force.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tunetardis@piefed.ca 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have no problem with functional protuberances. In fact, I wouldn't mind seeing more, such as a universal mounting connector of some sort? I don't know if I am atypical in this regard, but I like mounting my phone on things. Handlebars, car dashes, tripods, mic stands, etc. There are solutions for this, but they invariably involve something wrapping around and blocking some of the front side of the phone, which has become increasingly problematic over the years with screens pushing towards the edges. My bike holder sometimes blocks the front-facing camera needed to unlock the iPhone, for example. But if there were something on the back side that a mounting bracket could securely latch onto, none of this would be a problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brem@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

This is why you spend much money for name brand phone protector!

Not to make phone tough..

...but so..

.. it can sit level on flat surface!

load more comments
view more: next ›