this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
449 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25874 readers
3142 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 58 minutes ago

Isn't shutting down the federal government better?

States rights, amirite?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 131 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, so its actually, factually, Johnson who shut down the government.

Good to know as trivia I guess, not like right wingers are on speaking terms with reality.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 32 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

I'm curious why the GOP seems to be actively pursuing a shutdown right now, that they have full trilateral control over the Federal Government. Trump already isn't bothering to staff or govern the administrations they don't like, it seems like this would only hamper their goals with ICE & DHS, right?

Is there even an actual goal here? Or are they betting on Schumer et al caving at the last possible nanosecond?

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 1 points 53 minutes ago

Along with what others have said, a user in another thread pointed out that with a new financial year, they can repeat their performance with their July bill, basically doing whatever they want, so they probably consider it a win all around.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

They're betting on Democrats getting the blame. They might be right, though I hope not.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 hours ago

This still serves their larger goal of portraying government (supposedly representing the will of the people) as a whole as inefficient and unreliable. This furthers simplistic "strongman" attitudes as well as a continued push towards privatisation.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Grover Norquist, who founded Americans for Tax Reform in 1985 at the urging of President Reagan, declared in 2001: “I don’t want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.”

https://theconversation.com/the-shutdown-drowning-government-in-the-bathtub-111333

They are ideologically opposed to the government doing basically anything other than police and military duties, and having the bare minimum legal system required to facilitate criminal convictions for the poor, and the contract emforcement of private business.

Basically, they want the level of government that exists in Night City from Cyberpunk 2077, but probably without mass transit or even public roads.

This is what Rush Limbaugh's ditto hesds have been told they want for about 40 years, and now they are just doing it.

You can prosecute people for thought crimes snd not being the right sexuality or religion or skin color with this, so, that's all good with them.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 hours ago

It's a reasonable question. I don't know how many ICE agents are ok without getting the paycheck.

[–] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

Should they bet on consequences?

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 77 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas):

There are more mentions of Donald Trump in the Epstein Files than there are House Republicans here in Washington D.C. today.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 248 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 80 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Yup, this very much. Mike Johnson can go fuck himself.

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 25 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Based on the actions he's taken to cover up for pedophiles, he's more likely to go fuck a child.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

He definitely gives off child fucker vibes. He joined the right friend group.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 33 points 9 hours ago

MikeyJ gonna get on Grindr tonight to soothe his fee-fees and his pee-pee

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 21 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

He gets creepier every day. They’re gonna find bodies under his house.

[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

bodies of young men, dudes about to have his Grindr profile and IP leaked by a tiktoker apparantly lol.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

there's no way some freaky shit isn't happening with someone who has a porn pact with his son.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 78 points 9 hours ago

I loved that yesterday Vance claimed that he wanted to work with Dems on not cutting health care, and they should fund the government, then work with the GOP on healthcare.

This guy is such a liar. The GOP absolutely refused to work with the Dems during the creation of the “Big Beautiful Bill,” despite very loud calls to not cut healthcare to fund billionaire tax cuts.

[–] easybre_bb@lemmy.zip 40 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Anything but the Epstein files… There must be some really juicy stuff in there.

[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Yes. Evidence of Dump "allegedly" juicing all over some under aged girls with his BFF Epstien

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 98 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

Did you want them to rush the podium and eat Mike Johnson alive like a pack of hyenas, then reclaim congress?

Actually I could get behind that.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 7 points 7 hours ago

Then they'd get the GOPrions

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 19 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Except for being on grindr. I'm sure they feel deep shame about being on grindr.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 hours ago

Doesn’t he share his masturbatory habits with his son, in a sort of watchfulness pact or something? It’s so very weird.

[–] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 39 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Given the recent government, a shutdown might be an improvement.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 26 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Try turning it off and on again

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Then unplug it and plug it back in

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 40 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

But the democrats are the obstructionists?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AmericanEconomicThinkTank@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Like much of the administration, incompetence and yesmenship is what you get when you hamfistedly shove a junior statesmen into leadership.

Shit like this is why I spend time volunteering with potential candidates nationwide.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›