Considering everyone in the room knows the Commander in Chief wouldn't be able to pass the basic reading tests for recruits, I'd say this just doesn't hit home as well as they all hope it does.
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
148 points (98.7% liked)
politics
25874 readers
3154 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Considering how dead silent the room apparently was, I'd say you are right.
In the speech he said
"As history teaches us, the only people who actually deserve peace are those who are willing to wage war to defend it. That's why pacifism is so naive and dangerous. It ignores human nature and ignores human history. Either you protect your people and your sovereignty or you become subservient to something or someone. "
That sounds like an invitation for true patriots to "fix" the current administration.
They literally renamed the Department of Defense to the Department of War. How more explicit do we need them to be?
The most dangerous person is the world, is one convinced of their own righteousness.
They love to talk tough about 2A, and the three boxes of freedom, and peace thru power, right up until someone takes them up on it.
Four boxes of freedom. Soap box is frequently forgotten about. Soap box, jury box, ballot box, ammo box.
load more comments
(10 replies)
Those who will never see war in person sure like to push for more war.
Why don’t the Presidents fight the war? Why do they always send the poor?
This is a recurring theme in human history.
My favourite bit of all of this.
The Defense Secretary pointed to his own regimen as an example. “It all starts with physical fitness and appearance,” he said. “If the Secretary of War can do regular, hard PT [physical training], so can every member of our joint force.”
“Today at my direction, every member of the joint force, at every rank, is required … [to] meet height and weight requirements twice a year every year,” Hegseth added.
Someone remind me what fat orange bag of festering mayonnaise if at the top of these joint forces. I forget his name. I don't really see him doing jumping jacks.
Why would a height requirement need to be checked twice a year?
Well apparently Trump is shrinking because he’s supposed to be 6’3”
Doesn't make sense. Shorter soldiers have smaller hitboxes.
Source: N64 Goldeneye Oddjob
It sounds like dipshit thinks BMI is a good standard for fitness measurement
Not just Hegseth. The US military has always used BMI as part of fitness standards.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
No, this is a great idea. We should all get on Social Media and challenge the Snowflake-in-chief's ability to do the jumping jacks he is asking his troops to do. Taunt him with old videos of Jack LaLanne, since he seems stuck in the 80's culturally. With any luck, the problem will solve itself.
He literally said he can't even walk without being careful so he doesn't fall down, and he's acused exercise of shortening the lifespan because you have a finite number of heartbeats or something. In other words, the troops are expendable because shortening their lifespans through exercise is perfectly acceptable. Some animals are more equal and all that.
There are fat service members in BCP that probably PT harder than any of these fucks in charge.
I'm guessing Hegseth actually does workout regularly. It's part of his Master Race schtick. He likes to look good while showing off his white supremacy tattoos.
"A Nazi worked out today; did you?”
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
So we're back to bombing for peace.
Like fucking for virginity.
Fuck these clowns. Vote. Every. Single. Election.
School boards and mayors and locals, too.
School boards... too.
As seen in another thread today, some podunk shithole town in Oklahoma just learned that the hard way, LOL!
"I love peace. I don't care how many men, women, and children I need to kill to get it."
You’re assuming 2026 is happening.
Why are you so eager to give up?
I am medical. If people start shooting each other (more than they are already) I know my role already.
In terms of everything currently happening, every time someone says “vote” that feels like giving up in the right now while no election is happening. “Vote” says: just wait. Go sit down and wait. Take a nap, even, just wait. None of this matters, we’ll just “vote” later. There’s no action to be had, go read a book or something.
I’m not the one professing a “give up” strategy here.
load more comments
(6 replies)
And Congress authorized a war....when, exactly?
I guess you missed the memo. War is peace.
load more comments
(3 replies)
God, I hope it’s the war on Christmas! I’ve been waiting so long for that!
load more comments
(2 replies)
Alright, then, sir, we hereby disquallify the commander in chief based on your orders untill such time that he has proven to us to meet a minimum of phyisical standards.
"Preparing for war and preparing to win. Unrelenting and uncompromising in that pursuit. Not because we want war. No one here wants war. But it's because we love peace."
Somebody completely missed the point of Peacemaker.
Prepare for war with Americans, America.
So the military is going to do what they've been doing for decades. PT tests happen every six months already.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Also we're not paying any of your soldiers starting tomorrow, good luck with morale while you prep unpaid men to commit war crimes again
view more: next ›