this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
1068 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

75625 readers
1914 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (5 children)

This is why I didn't bother switching to GOS, Lineage, Calyx etc despite being sick of Apple's anti-foss monopoly — marketed as Privacy™️ and Security™️ — for years.

The late stage capitalism of western oligarchies indicated that Google's rug pull of AOSP was an imminent inevitability. After already having to change my services and workflows multiple times over the last 2 decades — despite careful analysis and forethought — due to services ever changing value propositions, acquisitions, and all other forms of enshittification, I'm at the point where I won't bother wasting energy on 99% of digital products unless they're open source and I can run them indefinitely on my own Linux server.

The more dependent you grow on digital products, the more interdependent they become, and the more time and effort is required to replace or substitute them.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

This is why I didn't bother switching to GOS, Lineage, Calyx etc despite being sick of Apple's anti-foss monopoly — marketed as Privacy™️ and Security™️ — for years.

I'm at the point where I won't bother wasting energy on 99% of digital products unless they're open source and I can run them indefinitely on my own Linux server.

but.. this doesn't make any sense. the roms you brought up can be still used indefinitely, they will still be able to install any apps. maybe except when they have installed the official google suite, but that's always a user choice in the popular android rom world, none of these preinstall it, and microg users are not affected

[–] yistdaj@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

What stops those open source projects having that same rugpull? AOSP was open source and for a long time could be installed on one's phone indefinitely.

You could argue ownership, but if Audacity can be bought then so can nearly anything.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] EonNShadow@pawb.social 11 points 1 day ago (11 children)

My job doesn't allow me to use a jailbroken/rooted device

So if/when this goes through I'll be switching to iOS.

Given the choice between two closed platforms, I'll pick the one that ostensibly says they're privacy focused instead of the one actively enshittifying their product.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your job can say what phone you have? I don't get it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] AmericanEconomicThinkTank@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Best part: the better names in the alt os and device scenes don't sell in us markets.

Unless you do the legwork of flashing your own device, most of us are out of luck.

I just love a good market stranglehold.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Would this be possible to bypass by bulding an app from source and convincing android that you are a developer who is testing his program?

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

theoretically installing through ADB will still work. but that's very impractical, and f-droid cannot do that.

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Theoretically, google could keep that workaround in the code, yes.

Tap for spoilerPractically it will be gone in 3...2...1....

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›