this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
53 points (98.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

64579 readers
260 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

America's Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has granted a patent to Tableau (Salesforce's visual analytics platform) — for a patent covering "Data Processing For Visualizing Hierarchical Data^___^

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Steve@communick.news 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's kind of a given that people are going to try to get patents for stupid things they obviously shouldn't. It's the whole job of the patent office to decline such requests. If people only ever applied for good and reasonable patents, then approval could be automatic. It's not, only because they need to filter out the bad ones.

The real problem here is that the patent was granted. It seems dumb to apply for it. But how dumb is it, if applications like this actually get approved?

[–] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 17 points 3 days ago

Unfortunately, the current state of the patent office is extremely understaffed and mostly nontechnical. So, there's not enough qualified examiners to examine patents, not just in software, but medical devices, voting machines, and lots of other industries. So essentially if a patent is submitted by a major company, it just gets rubber stamped. And it's up to the courts to sort it out. Unfortunately that sorting out is biased and understaffed, too, so usually the initial case will go to the patent holder by default and it's not until an appeal or two on those biases and technical misinterpretations that it can be invalidated. So it's rare for a smaller company to be able to spend that much money to invalidate an obvious idea like this. Of course this is by design to give large corporations an unfair advantage. If they want some tech, they just sue for a stupid patent, wait until the company either folds and then they can steal it legally, or goes bankrupt fighting it and they can acquire them hostilely.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago

Uh, unless you want to make tableau basically an effective monopoly on the... idea of graphs...

Then no, no, this is a very bad idea.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

(Posting this here because these MFers think they can own the world. Don't buy their shit. Pirate it.)

[–] Magnum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

What are you doing with tableu? What do you need to pirate lol