this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
114 points (78.8% liked)

Games

42573 readers
1218 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's true. Reviewers rave about a game, I pick it up and play it, and they're raving about a new one before I've finished that last one. I've got a list of 20+ games that came out this year that I still haven't gotten around to. I might get through 5 of them before the new year. And you know, if wouldn't hurt my ability to play more games if more of them were shorter.

EDIT: I provided this anecdote as a reason contributing to the problems that the industry is experiencing. The article is about the trouble the industry is experiencing as a result of too many competing games being released in a given year. It is not about how I feel about trying to play through many of the ones I found interesting. Apparently Schreier had the same problem on BlueSky with people answering what they think the headline says rather than what the article is about.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] impudentmortal@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Dear video game developers,

There are too many video games nowadays. Please eliminate three.

I am not a crackpot.

[–] verdi@feddit.org 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Statistically, if more than half of a random sample of steam games are rated to be good, the standards for evaluation are shit.

And the people that were supposed to let us know if a game is good or not, the "professionals", have a median score around ~75% according to open critic data, otherwise they wouldn't have a job because sponsors would gfo.

We're on our own shifting through a pile of de facto shovelware to find anything of worth nowadays.

It's a problem not exclusive to games, mind you. Music, scientific publishing and other content for profit industries have the exact same issue: Vetting quality requires work so for profit institutions offload the vetting to the user.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

Oh well, ill just stick to forums to find out about quality games.

Tap for spoilerSurprise, dickbag! Its all guerilla marketing!

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (5 children)

The things getting reviewed already have a selection bias that makes them more likely to review well. It's not a problem that reviewers focus their time on the games that their audience is most interested in, as opposed to reviewing every asset flip published to Steam.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

I haven't finished half of my backlog because I'm mainly playing Fallout 76 and No Man's Sky. I don't have time to play every game I want just like I do not have time to watch every show on TV.

[–] kuribo@aussie.zone 7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Reviewers rave about a game, I pick it up and play it, and they're raving about a new one before I've finished that last one.

ADHD is treatable.

[–] Harrk@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Unless you’re from the UK where their idea of treatment is getting you to give up seeking it.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Or if you're in the US where all healthcare is absolute dogshit.

[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

This part of ADHD actually isn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why does anyone read Bloomberg? That shit is the equivalent of the suit wearing shitty little twerp on a college campus c. 2017 being a conservative edge lord. Change my mind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rozodru@piefed.social 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's not a problem for me just because of the cost. I want to play Expedition 33 but I'm not sure I want to pay $70 to do so.

I'm happy just playing my old ROM collections or booting up Cyberpunk or whatever. but now I just can't justify dropping $70+ on a game anymore.

sigh, I'll probably just end up going back to EVE Online.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not every game costs $70. Expedition 33 in particular only costs $50 when it's not on sale, unless you're in a different region where $50 USD converts to $70 in your country.

[–] rozodru@piefed.social 4 points 5 days ago

yup, am a Canuck :/

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 4 points 5 days ago

And you know, if wouldn't hurt my ability to play more games if more of them were shorter.

From the article:

In 2024, a staggering 18,626 games were released on Steam, according to SteamDB, a website that tracks data on the popular PC platform. That’s an increase of around 93% from 2020, when 9,656 games were released.

By my count, if you don't sleep or eat and only play videogames you need every game to be about 30 minutes long on average.

I mean, it wouldn't hurt, but I'm gonna say it's not enough.

In all seriousness, I'm more concerned by the competition from social media and on demand video. I'm typing this, which isn't that interesting of an activity. Idling online is a huge time sink, and it's getting bigger.

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

I'm still playing Doom, the original!

[–] rozodru@piefed.social 3 points 5 days ago

please, don't. I'm on another 3 month break from EVE and I don't want to go back just yet but....please...don't I'm tired boss.

this has been my life since 2003. EVE, take a break, EVE, another break, EVE, so on and so forth.

[–] palarith@aussie.zone 3 points 4 days ago

It’s the same with tv. I am very picky with my time. So i play very few games or watch very few shows.

[–] gummorgue@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

This is also a lot of covid era games/funding come to fruition imo

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

How is having more options a problem?

I'm playing games that came out 10 hears ago, and I have a backlog of many years and I couldn't be happier with it.

It's better than no having anything to play.

At a industry level we all know that gamedev is not a great career. Specially if you are indie the most common profit is 0. But it's ok. You can do it just for the love of it as I do. I spent time making games just because I love it. No everything have to turn a profit.

[–] kratoz29@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago

This becomes even worse when you also want to play old gems that missed because you weren't even born, or because you had kid taste in your early gaming days, but there are worse things to complain at.

My first two video games that I had were Gran Turismo and Dragon Ball Z Ultimate Battle 22, so at my 6 years old or so I already had negative time of hundreds of nice jRPG gems LMAO.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Elden Ring has been praised by everyone.

It's one thing if a reviewer says it's good. His livelyhood relies on the video game industry thriveing. If you stop buying this game, the studio won't make the next game. If the studio won't make the next game, the reviewer can't review the next game. If the reviewer can't review the next game, then where does their paycheck come from?

So I'm not saying they knowingly artificially raise scores and sell games. I'm just saying maybe a 7 gets reviewed as an 8 just so the reviewer won't feel awkward when meeting with industry folk at the next industry get together.

But when gamers collectively band together, and say itxs 10/10, and game of the year, I feel rest assured that Elden Ring is as good as people say.

I have not bought Elden Ring. I have not played Elden Ring. In all honesty, I probably won't. Why?

BECAUSE YOU DON'T NEED TO PLAY EVERY SINGLE GAME JUST BECAUSE IT'S AMAZING!!! YOU CAN JUST NOOOOOT PLAY IT!

Don't blame too many games. Don't blame reviewers. Don't blame anything. This is only a problem if you let it control your life. Variety is good for everybody. Some games you can just let others enjoy. I'm glad Elden Ring is so great. I don't feel bad I missed it. I'm happy for you if you loved it.

Isn't that so much healthier of an attitude to have?

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

The article is about how so many games are coming out that many of the companies making them are going under even when they make games that are evaluated as being good or great. I provided an anecdote about myself that probably contributes to it. I didn't really share it to be about my attitude toward being able to play these games. I'll be just fine.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›