this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
158 points (98.8% liked)

politics

26257 readers
3569 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The idea that an entire republic is dependent upon the unaddressable interpretations and integrity of 12 priests in robes, priests whom are not democratically elected or accountable to the people, is an absurdity.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lifelong… If my boss told me I could never be fired no matter how shitty of a job I did, you better believe I would be the worst!

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They can be fired - SC justices can be recalled via impeachment by Congress, who ultimately derives their power from the people via elections. Congress is abdicating responsibility and power, and the electorate is too ignorant to know or care. The whole chain of responsibility is simply being ignored because the people voted for this repeatedly.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

True, there’s only ever been one impeachment though. No removal.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Skill issue

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Congress, no.

Republicans, yes.

Regardless of the flaws in the system even a perfect system would break when half of the people running it are acting with malice.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh completely, I'm not a "both sides" guy. I think my point is quite aligned with yours, which is that the system is actually fairly reflective of the will of the people, it just turns out people are willing to go fascist for $5. The checks and balances aren't broken, they're just not being used because a plurality of elected officials represent people who actively want this.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Conservatives have wanted to gut the Fed with a bowie knife since fucking Andrew Jackson, so this isn't a blunder to them.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Stop, the conservative justices can only get so erect!

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Court is adjourned. I'll be in my chambers ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good, it should be under democratic control, like it was in the New Deal era. The problem isn’t the loss of Wall Street’s power over the Fed, it’s that Trump is in power.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 1 month ago

Why expect consistency from the courts starting now or in the future?